Bug: restarting staff destroys DynamicLineSpanner.staff-padding after line break

2019-03-06 Thread Trevor Bača
Hi, Restarting the staff during the lifespan of a multisystem DynamicLineSpanner destroys the value of DynamicLineSpanner properties (like staff-padding) that were set when the DynamicLineSpanner was created. In the MWE below, the hairpin should exhibit staff-padding equal to 10 staff spaces

Re: LilyPond 64-bit version for a Mac

2019-03-06 Thread Hans Åberg
> On 6 Mar 2019, at 04:20, Austin Blaser wrote: > > Regarding the iOS App Store: Oh yeah I forgot about the licensing: definitely > a potential deal breaker. Isn't it enough to distribute the sources along with the app, as with Stockfish https://stockfishchess.org/download/

Re: Discussion about Lilypond(for GSoC 2019 project)

2019-03-06 Thread Karlin High
On 3/6/2019 12:02 PM, AKSHITA TYAGI wrote: What I think is that it should work on more languages. Like India, Chinese etc these are the countries that are really found of music and use of Lilypond would increase if it is available in more languages. More translations sounds like a welcome

Discussion about Lilypond(for GSoC 2019 project)

2019-03-06 Thread AKSHITA TYAGI
Hi, I have been studying about Lilypond and it seems to be a very good program. But it work for only a limited number of languages. What I think is that it should work on more languages. Like India, Chinese etc these are the countries that are really found of music and use of Lilypond would

Re: weird error with \repeat tremolo

2019-03-06 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
Hi Aaron On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 4:11 PM Aaron Hill wrote: > > The bug would seem to be that LilyPond is not allowed to increase the > length of a stem to accommodate StemTremolo grobs with notes that are > beamed. Or perhaps, it is allowed but is failing to do so. Either way, > the code that

Re: weird error with \repeat tremolo

2019-03-06 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2019-03-06 6:24 am, David Kastrup wrote: Aaron Hill writes: On 2019-03-06 4:15 am, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: Hi Aaron, here's another example that causes the error: \version "2.19.82" \relative c'' { \time 4/16 gis'32[ e c a \repeat tremolo 8 { fis64] } } Again, it seems related to

Re: weird error with \repeat tremolo

2019-03-06 Thread David Kastrup
Aaron Hill writes: > On 2019-03-06 4:15 am, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: >> Hi Aaron, >> >> here's another example that causes the error: >> >> \version "2.19.82" >> >> \relative c'' { >> \time 4/16 >> gis'32[ e c a \repeat tremolo 8 { fis64] } >> } >> >> Again, it seems related to collisions

Re: weird error with \repeat tremolo

2019-03-06 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2019-03-06 4:15 am, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: Hi Aaron, here's another example that causes the error: \version "2.19.82" \relative c'' { \time 4/16 gis'32[ e c a \repeat tremolo 8 { fis64] } } Again, it seems related to collisions between beams and tremolo glyphs. But here, the

Re: weird error with \repeat tremolo

2019-03-06 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
Hi Aaron, here's another example that causes the error: \version "2.19.82" \relative c'' { \time 4/16 gis'32[ e c a \repeat tremolo 8 { fis64] } } Again, it seems related to collisions between beams and tremolo glyphs. But here, the 32nd-notes should force the bottom beam low enough that

Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?

2019-03-06 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
Hi Aaron On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 11:51 AM Aaron Hill wrote: > > > > \mark produces RehearsalMark grobs. These are usually at the \Score > > level, so you can either \override where you use \mark, or you can do > > it within \layout: > > > > > > \version "2.19.82" > > \layout { \context {

Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?

2019-03-06 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2019-03-06 2:48 am, Aaron Hill wrote: On 2019-03-06 2:37 am, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: Hi List, also on this issue (I still have Roman numerals, which works fine for me): is there a way to format the size/weight of the "\mark \default" character? Mine aren't much larger than regular text

Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?

2019-03-06 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2019-03-06 2:37 am, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: Hi List, also on this issue (I still have Roman numerals, which works fine for me): is there a way to format the size/weight of the "\mark \default" character? Mine aren't much larger than regular text markups, and I'd like to have some control

Re: Roman Numeral rehearsal marks?

2019-03-06 Thread N. Andrew Walsh
Hi List, also on this issue (I still have Roman numerals, which works fine for me): is there a way to format the size/weight of the "\mark \default" character? Mine aren't much larger than regular text markups, and I'd like to have some control over the presentation. Cheers, A On Wed, Oct 24,