Re: On Frescobaldi

2019-04-21 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi David, Was meant to be offlist to Urs, but never mind. Frescobaldi always used to update just fine, with no manual intervention. The behaviour has changed, and it si only when you have two separate files involved. It's only been happening since say, Ubuntu 18.04 or so (but don't ask me to

Re: On Frescobaldi

2019-04-21 Thread David Wright
On Mon 22 Apr 2019 at 12:31:54 (+1000), Andrew Bernard wrote: > Dear Urs, > > On a different tack altogether, with the oll work, you have a usage file > and a module.ily, so two files. In my Frescobaldi 3 on a brand new Ubuntu > 19 installation (the latest release as of last week) it still shows

On Frescobaldi

2019-04-21 Thread Andrew Bernard
Dear Urs, On a different tack altogether, with the oll work, you have a usage file and a module.ily, so two files. In my Frescobaldi 3 on a brand new Ubuntu 19 installation (the latest release as of last week) it still shows the problem I mentioned a while ago where the output PDF is not updated

Re: scheme-question about accumulating lists of lists

2019-04-21 Thread David Pirotte
Hi Thomas, > ... > Thanks again! You're welcome. I used 'funny' (weird) procedure and variable names, but if the procedure is to be exposed to your users, and with the objective of making it simple to use, read and maintain, as you described later in your answer, you could write it as - using

Edition Engraver master vs refactor override branch: changing bound-details

2019-04-21 Thread Stefano Troncaro
Hi all, long time since I posted here, hope you all have been well! While using the Edition Engraver today I noticed that the following override works in the old refactor override branch, while on the current master it prints a textless spanner and a warning: \version "2.19.80" \include

Re: scheme-question about accumulating lists of lists

2019-04-21 Thread Thomas Morley
Am So., 21. Apr. 2019 um 02:34 Uhr schrieb David Pirotte : > > Hi Thomas, > > > ... > > Thanks pointing me to this possibility, in my use-case I then could do: > > (define (p) (cons '(1 2 3) '(4 5 6))) > > (define l1 '(a b c)) > > (define l2 '(x y z)) > > (cons* l1 l2 (car (p)) (cdr (p)) '()) > >

Re: Multi non static substition

2019-04-21 Thread David Kastrup
"E Appeldoorn" writes: > I have defined this function in an include.ly file > > MyMarkup = { > \markup > \override #'(adjust-x-pos . 1.0) >\override #'(adjust-length . 1.5) > } Unlikely. > How can I extend that

Re: Multi non static substition

2019-04-21 Thread David Kastrup
Andrew Bernard writes: > Hi Ursus, > > Apologies, you most likely want to define a new markup function. Markup command. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user