On Sat 20 Jul 2019 at 17:09:44 (-0500), Karlin High wrote:
> On 7/20/2019 3:48 PM, Bill via lilypond-user wrote:
> > I have been reading this list for a month now and whenever I click
> > on an attachment link I get a message not found.
> >
> > Here is an example
> >
> >
On 7/20/2019 3:48 PM, Bill via lilypond-user wrote:
I have been reading this list for a month now and whenever I click on an
attachment link I get a message not found.
Here is an example
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/attachments/20190718/237e8abe/attachment.png
Here is
Hi David K.,
in the last few days you should have received some private messages
from me and others sent to . Did you get them?
In case you didn't get them, or if you got them and you answered: I
didn't receive a reply; maybe there is a mailing issue. I would
gladly resend the messages to an
I have been reading this list for a month now and whenever I click on an
attachment link I get a message not found.
Here is an example
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/attachments/20190718/237e8abe/attachment.png
message is
Not Found
The requested URL
There seems to be a problem in the merging whole measure rests
code. With 2.18.2, I'd been using the 336-based snippet from
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wbsoft/lilymusic/master/include/merge-rests.ily
for some years, though I changed 0) on the 110th line to 1)
in order to get the
Thanks. Unfortunately, my mail client uses > to delineate threading in
conversations, so even if I copy/paste code that compiles, my client mangles it.
And somehow, I knew this was the solution, because it was in the manual for
like 2.10, but I haven't used this construction in so long, I'd
Thomas Morley writes:
> Am Sa., 20. Juli 2019 um 08:29 Uhr schrieb james via lilypond-user
> :
>>
>> Hello, I don't understand why this results in the output it does.
>
> Anyway, I can't explain the (buggy) 2.18.2-behaviour.
> Though, more recent versions compile correctly (after removing the
Am Sa., 20. Juli 2019 um 08:29 Uhr schrieb james via lilypond-user
:
>
> Hello, I don't understand why this results in the output it does.
> I wanted to have the second voice instantiated in the beginning because it is
> used later and I would like to have the lyrics align vertically.
>
Hello, I don't understand why this results in the output it does.
I wanted to have the second voice instantiated in the beginning because it is
used later and I would like to have the lyrics align vertically.
Alternatively, I thought to use \addlyrics after each little section of lyrics,
but the
