Provide an example picture.
Andrew
On Mon., 23 Sep. 2019, 12:36 pm Eby Mani via lilypond-user, <
lilypond-user@gnu.org> wrote:
> Is there a snippet for "2.18.2" to add old school style of parenthesised
> ties or slurs as found on old 19th century editions ?.
>
> Thanks,
> eby
>
>
Is there a snippet for "2.18.2" to add old school style of parenthesised ties
or slurs as found on old 19th century editions ?.
Thanks,
eby
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi all,
> \tweak stencil #point-stencil
> \tuplet 3/2 4 {
> af''8 g8. f16 f8 ef8. df16
> \tweak color #red
> \tuplet 3/2 {
> df16[ ef df
> } c8 r16 bf]
> }
> }
Similar, with similarly successful results:
\version "2.19.83"
\include "english.ly"
\relative {
\tweak
Hi David,
> I find that tweaks of the TupletNumber stencil are somewhat quirky.
> There may be a bug involved.
I would have thought \single would work there, but it doesn’t seem to.
Is there a possible/likely fix for that?
Thanks,
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan,
Knute Snortum writes:
> I have what may be a simple problem, but I can't see how to do it. I have
> a series of eighth-note triplets with one of those eighth-notes further
> divided into sixteenth-note triplets. I want to omit the TupletNumber on
> the eighth-note triplets but not on the
I have what may be a simple problem, but I can't see how to do it. I have
a series of eighth-note triplets with one of those eighth-notes further
divided into sixteenth-note triplets. I want to omit the TupletNumber on
the eighth-note triplets but not on the sixteenth-note triplets. Like this:
Hi AndrewBy making it only a *little* more fiddly and tedious I can get pretty close.I feel your pain...Damian\version "2.19.83"\header { tagline = "" }{ \time 1/8 \clef bass \override Score.TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = ##t << { \once \omit TupletNumber \once \omit
The rhythm itself is easy to play in isolation but it looks from this snippet
as if it would be very difficult to judge the speed so as to coordinate with
the other players.
Damian
On 22 September 2019 at 15:41, Michael Gerdau wrote:
10 quintuplet 32nds are grouped 3, 5:4, 3
> 10 quintuplet 32nds are grouped 3, 5:4, 3
Aha...I see.
This triggers the next curiosity question:
Are conductors or human musicians supposed to count that out or is that purely
for machine reproduction?
Again I’m only curious.
Kind regards,
Michael
Hi Michael
10 quintuplet 32nds are grouped 3, 5:4, 3
Damian
On 22 September 2019 at 11:56, Michael Gerdau wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I‘m not convinced I understand the intended meaning of the picture you posted.
The meaning I do think is intended in turn would be a trivial tautology, just
like
Am So., 22. Sept. 2019 um 01:22 Uhr schrieb Andrew Bernard
:
>
> I have come to an impasse in a score I am setting. Is it even remotely
> possible to have a tuplet nested _across_ two tuplets with lilypond? See
> attached image.
>
> [Don't blame me for the musical aspect of this - it's not my
Hi Andrew,
I‘m not convinced I understand the intended meaning of the picture you posted.
The meaning I do think is intended in turn would be a trivial tautology, just
like when you have a stream of tuplet 3/2 8th you could group any 3 notes along
the stream without additional information.
Hello Damian,
Thanks for your effort. But look here:
\version "2.19.83"
{
\override Score.TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = ##t
<<
{
\time 1/8
% \once \omit TupletNumber
\tuplet 5/4 {
s32 s s
\tuplet 5/4
{
\stemDown
g'32[ 32
13 matches
Mail list logo
