On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, Paolo Prete wrote:
Here's the fixed version:
waiting for feedbacks!
(Again and again: I write these snippets really in a hurry, in these days. A more
"structured" collaboration is getting necessary for me, at this point)
Put it in a little Github project?
--
MT
Hi David,
I probably have messed something up in the editor coding style. Currently
I'm using at least three different editors ad the same time.
I know it's weird and bad, but don't have time to switch to a proper env.
In Christmas days things are even more difficult...
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at
Here's the fixed version:
waiting for feedbacks!
(Again and again: I write these snippets really in a hurry, in these days.
A more "structured" collaboration is getting necessary for me, at this
point)
Any Javascript volunteer?
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 1:24 AM Paolo Prete wrote:
> I'm just
On Mon 16 Dec 2019 at 23:55:52 (+0100), Paolo Prete wrote:
> P.S) I don't know why the browser's viewer messes up the indentation of
> these attachments.
> If so, I ask if are there volunteers to fix that and re-post the snippet (I
> see correct indentation if I paste the code to any online js
I'm just noting that there's a bug with more than one Beam. I'm fixing it.
Have a bit of patience please ;-)
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:55 PM Paolo Prete wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> here is another snippet that uses the system that I previously
> implemented. This time for the tuning of the
On 12/16, Paolo Prete wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> here is another snippet that uses the system that I previously
> implemented. This time for the tuning of the beams. This is too a
> very tedious operation to do with just the code and for this I believe
> that this tool is also useful. As
Hello everybody,
here is another snippet that uses the system that I previously implemented.
This time for the tuning of the beams.
This is too a very tedious operation to do with just the code and for this
I believe that this tool is also useful.
As you can see, the code is not only shorter than
Hi - I've been working to adapt Colored Noteheads/Outlines (
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=890) to highlight tonic notes, and also
be able to color a given voice. I've adjusted the variables to let me
specify tonic-color and part-color when I call the function, and I've
narrowed the note
Ralph Palmer writes:
> Greetings -
>
> I feel kind of stupid. I don't understand why the following four examples
> all produce the same output. Are the \upbow and \trill *not*
> TextScripts?
Neither are. They are both of type Script , not TextScript . That
doesn't change the principal problem
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Yes… but each of your four codes is telling Lilypond the same thing. ;)
Ahh - because "\once \override" applies not to the following text, but to the
musical moment, right?
Exactly. And the order of items within that moment doesn’t change their
priority order.
Hi Ralph,
>> Yes… but each of your four codes is telling Lilypond the same thing. ;)
> Ahh - because "\once \override" applies not to the following text, but to the
> musical moment, right?
Exactly. And the order of items within that moment doesn’t change their
priority order.
> Perfect!
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:22 AM Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> > I don't understand why the following four examples all produce the same
> output. Are the \upbow and \trill *not* TextScripts?
>
> Yes… but each of your four codes is telling Lilypond the same thing.
Hi Ralph,
> I don't understand why the following four examples all produce the same
> output. Are the \upbow and \trill *not* TextScripts?
Yes… but each of your four codes is telling Lilypond the same thing. ;)
> I'm trying to get the trill below the upbow.
How about
f'4( -\tweak
Hi Dominic,
> I can reduce the spacing between the system to a very small amount via
> (padding . 0.0) in
> system-system-spacing. But then the distance between chords and the
> corresponding lyrics
> is relatively big (like setting the above padding to 2.0). Which spacing
> setting can be
>
Greetings -
I feel kind of stupid. I don't understand why the following four examples
all produce the same output. Are the \upbow and \trill *not* TextScripts?
I'm trying to get the trill below the upbow.
I'm using LilyPond 2.19.83 with Frescobaldi 3.0.0 under Linux/Ubuntu 18.04
Hi all,
It is a quite good solution for now, and as you said, inter-lyric gaps are
still there.
For my current situation I could live with it, but it's far from perfect.
I can reduce the spacing between the system to a very small amount via (padding
. 0.0) in
system-system-spacing. But then
"Peter Gentry" writes:
> This issue has been resolved with help from David.
Unless one of the more helpful Davids on this list pitched in in
private, I would not say that I had nearly enough information available
to contribute anything that could in good conscience be called "help".
This is
This issue has been resolved with help from David. Should anyone be
interested all the files can be found at sunscales.co.uk under the composer
Farrenc.
I did get a bit confused with \cueDuring and \transposedCueDuring..
Regards Peter
>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5621/
>>
>> I would have preferred to have it printed over an "imaginary bar
>> line", see issue 1150.
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1150/
>
> I don't object. Honestly, I don't care where it is positioned as
> long
19 matches
Mail list logo
