MIDI problems on Mojave.

Confer: https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/79409/error-initializing-coremidi-starting-logic-pro-x-on-mojave I discovered this problem because I use LogicX also.  I'll check it out on Catalina. J. On 12/28/19 13:29, Davide Liessi wrote: > Il giorno sab 28 dic 2019 alle ore 21:54 John

Re: QtWebEngine vs. Ubuntu 16.04

On 12/29, Simon Albrecht wrote: > In case you have an immediate idea why the machine might fail to boot > into a live USB stick, please let me know—I’m going to try enabling USB > legacy support in BIOS right now… Was the USB not detected in the boot menu at all, or was it detected but failed at

Re: QtWebEngine vs. Ubuntu 16.04

On 28.12.19 20:00, ma...@masonhock.com wrote: On 12/28, Simon Albrecht wrote: I want to spend as little time as possible on maintaining/upgrading the OS. So I’m reluctant to ditch 16.04 just yet. Should I bite the bullet and take the time to install 18.04? 18.04 has been out long enough that

Re: [Frescobaldi] Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

> On Dec 28, 2019, at 5:15 PM, Stanton Sanderson >> >> What is the behaviour you are observing? > > Away from my machine. Will report ASAP. Davide, As you stated, the edited file is temporary and must be saved first to replace an existing pdf. Sorry for the noise. Stan

Re: LilyJSSVG

On 12/29, Paolo Prete wrote: > this is a first TEST pre-beta-beta (etc. etc.) version of a graphic editor > entirely in Javascript and generated by Lilypond itself. Made mainly for > fun in my spare time. > This GUI editor extends the functionality that I had experimented with the > snippet

LilyJSSVG

Hello to all, this is a first TEST pre-beta-beta (etc. etc.) version of a graphic editor entirely in Javascript and generated by Lilypond itself. Made mainly for fun in my spare time. This GUI editor extends the functionality that I had experimented with the snippet published a few days ago for

Re: [Frescobaldi] Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

Stan > On Dec 28, 2019, at 3:45 PM, Davide Liessi wrote: > > What is the behaviour you are observing? Away from my machine. Will report ASAP.

Re: Lyrics on rest question

On 2019-12-28 2:39 pm, Jacques Menu wrote: How can the « "Syll.3" » lyric be placed under the eigth rest at the beginning of measure 3 to obtain the same result with Lily as with the others? A couple options I can think of: 1) Hidden pitch in the \lyricsto voice context; place the rest in a

Re: Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

Seems to be. I just verified it a couple of times on Mojave.  No sound output without doing it first.  No MIDI events show in the flashing green light on Qsynth unless doing it first. J. On 12/28/19 13:29, Davide Liessi wrote: > Il giorno sab 28 dic 2019 alle ore 21:54 John Helly > ha scritto:

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

> On Dec 28, 2019, at 3:22 PM, Davide Liessi wrote: > > Il giorno sab 28 dic 2019 alle ore 20:01 Tim McNamara > ha scritto: >> I downloaded the .dmg and installed on Catalina 10.15.1. The app crashes on >> launch each time. I have a log file for this which is attached as a PDF, as >> a

Lyrics on rest question

Hello folks, When converting the attached MusicXML file, extracted from the Echigo Jishi example, with musicxml2ly, I obtain a LilyPond file (simplified here) containing: %%% \version "2.19.83" % automatically converted by musicxml2ly from SyllableOnRest_musicxml2ly.xml

Re: Question about GPL license

On 12/28, Paolo Prete wrote: > In these days, I worked at my Javascript script which allows to place > Lilypond's grobs with the mouse. I think I'm ready to share a test > version on Github. From what I see, the only license that I can use > for it is GPLv3. In order to make your code compatible

Question about GPL license

Hello all, In these days, I worked at my Javascript script which allows to place Lilypond's grobs with the mouse. I think I'm ready to share a test version on Github. >From what I see, the only license that I can use for it is GPLv3. Can you confirm that? I just saw this article about the bad

Re: [Frescobaldi] Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

Il giorno sab 28 dic 2019 alle ore 22:30 Stanton Sanderson ha scritto: > Another behavior noted (change from previous versions): the new pdf generated > when editing an existing file does not replace the old pdf. I cannot reproduce this. If I change an existing document, save it and compile it,

Re: [Frescobaldi] Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

On 12/28/19 13:11, Stanton Sanderson wrote: > An anomaly noted: document conversion from 2.19.2 to 2.19.83 fails with the > following error message reported: >> ImportError: Bad magic number in >> /Applications/Frescobaldi.app/Contents/Resources/site.pyc Il giorno sab 28 dic 2019 alle ore

Re: [Frescobaldi] Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

> On Dec 28, 2019, at 3:23 PM, John Helly wrote: > > I confirm same behavior. > J. > > On 12/28/19 13:11, Stanton Sanderson wrote: >> (Mac OS Mojave (current), Frescobaldi 3.1 from dmg) Another behavior noted (change from previous versions): the new pdf generated when editing an existing

Re: Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

Il giorno sab 28 dic 2019 alle ore 21:54 John Helly ha scritto: > 1. Audio MIDI Setup.app Are you sure this step is necessary? As far as I understand it should not be. > I have a bunch of macs and could help with testing; if that's useful. Thanks for the offer: it might indeed be very useful,

Re: [Frescobaldi] Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

I confirm same behavior. J. On 12/28/19 13:11, Stanton Sanderson wrote: > (Mac OS Mojave (current), Frescobaldi 3.1 from dmg) > > An anomaly noted: document conversion from 2.19.2 to 2.19.83 fails with the > following error message reported: > >> ImportError: Bad magic number in >>

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Il giorno sab 28 dic 2019 alle ore 20:01 Tim McNamara ha scritto: > I downloaded the .dmg and installed on Catalina 10.15.1. The app crashes on > launch each time. I have a log file for this which is attached as a PDF, as > a non-programmer it’s gobbledygook to me. Can you try running it

Re: [Frescobaldi] Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

(Mac OS Mojave (current), Frescobaldi 3.1 from dmg) An anomaly noted: document conversion from 2.19.2 to 2.19.83 fails with the following error message reported: > ImportError: Bad magic number in > /Applications/Frescobaldi.app/Contents/Resources/site.pyc > > > The document has not been

Frescobaldi 3.1 Successes (happy to report)

Aloha. 1. Tried unsuccessfully to build from scratch on 10.14.6 (Mojave) and ran into a series of python dependency problems that I haven't fully solved. 2. Downloaded the 3.1 dmg and successfullly run it on 10.14.6 (Mojave) and 10.15.2 (Catalina).  Nice job. 3. Tested on 10.14.6

Re: QtWebEngine vs. Ubuntu 16.04

On 12/28, Simon Albrecht wrote: > I want to spend as little time as possible on maintaining/upgrading > the OS. So I’m reluctant to ditch 16.04 just yet. Should I bite the > bullet and take the time to install 18.04? 18.04 has been out long enough that major bugs should have been worked out by

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Sorry, forgot to copy the list. On 12/28, ma...@masonhock.com wrote: > On 12/28, Urs Liska wrote: > > Ubuntu 16.04 is a LTS release with (IIRC) five years of support. So it > > is not unreasonable for someone to use it. However, we (Frescobaldi) > > seem to have been hit by this five-year term

Re: Overriding Script symbol with markup

Hi Daniel, > What property of Script do I need to override in order to replace the symbol > with markup? Here’s an example I have in my include code: \version "2.19.83" pocoAccent = -\tweak stencil #ly:text-interface::print -\tweak self-alignment-X #-0.5 -\tweak text \markup \override

Overriding Script symbol with markup

What property of Script do I need to override in order to replace the symbol with markup? Example: { \override Script.? = \markup { foo } c'1\trill } would print "foo" instead of the trill symbol. DR

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Am 28.12.19 um 14:08 schrieb Ralph Palmer: Hi, Urs - On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 3:47 AM Urs Liska > wrote: Ubuntu 16.04 is a LTS release with (IIRC) five years of support. So it is not unreasonable for someone to use it. However, we (Frescobaldi)

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

I have my own question. In the INSTALL document it states that Poppler 0.82.0 or greater is required. On my Ubuntu 19.10 system I have only version 0.80.0 and I'm having trouble building it from source. Also, my Poppler seem to be tied to python3-poppler-qt which is at 0.24.2-3build5. So will

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

On 2019-12-28 1:11 a.m., Andrew Bernard wrote: Thank you Wilbert and the team. With an existing Ubuntu 19.04 Frescobaldi 3.0.0 installation, all I had to do was install from the tarball and add the following: apt install python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine Running Fedora 31 and an existing 3.0.0

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 5:08 AM Ralph Palmer wrote: > As I've said before, I'm a novice at command line Linux, but I'm attaching a > screenshot of my command line search (locate) for QtWebEngine and QtWebKit. > I'm running Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS. > > Hope this helps, > > Ralph Try this. First

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released! How to install with windows?

Hi, Wilbert: Thank you for the new version of Frecobalsi v3.1. I am a window 10 user, I have a hard time installing the new frecobaldi v3.1. I download the frecobaldi 3.1.tar.gz and extract it to a folder. Then I click on setup .py NOTHING happen. I need help to install. Thank again, Ming

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released! How to install with windows?

What to do to install Frescobaldi 3.1 on windows? Kind regards Bernhard Am 27.12.2019 um 11:20 schrieb Wilbert Berendsen: > Dear Friends, > > Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released! There are many new features. > > Most notably: > > - A new Fonts dialog to select fonts for text, and with more recent

Re: [Frescobaldi] Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Wilbert & Davide, Sincere thanks for the wonderful update and rapid port to Mac. I am in awe! Happy New Year to you and your families. Stan Illinois, USA

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Hi, Urs - On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 3:47 AM Urs Liska wrote: > Ubuntu 16.04 is a LTS release with (IIRC) five years of support. So it > is not unreasonable for someone to use it. However, we (Frescobaldi) > seem to have been hit by this five-year term since we're dealing with a > change in the Qt

Re: QtWebEngine vs. Ubuntu 16.04

I'd expect it's not possible to update just QtWebEngine but the complete Qt framework. I imagine that would involve two installations (Qt and PyQt) and then make Frescobaldi use it. Probably one wouldn't want *every* app to use that "alien" package, though. Urs Am 28. Dezember 2019 11:44:36

Re: QtWebEngine vs. Ubuntu 16.04

Hi everybody, On 28.12.19 09:46, Urs Liska wrote: Before upgrading to a newer OS it might be an option to use a current Qt/PyQt downloaded or compiled from somewhere. @Simon you could do us a huge favor by exploring that possibility and providing information about it for the Wiki. This is

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Il giorno sab 28 dic 2019 alle ore 10:19 Jacques Menu ha scritto: > I’ve switched to it on Mac OS 10.14.6 (Mojave, which still allows 32bit apps > to be run), and it runs fine. Good to know! Anyway, the application bundle contains only 64 bit code. Best wishes. Davide

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Hello Wilbert and Davide, Thanks a lot for the great job issuing this Frescobaldi 3.1 release! I’ve switched to it on Mac OS 10.14.6 (Mojave, which still allows 32bit apps to be run), and it runs fine. Will let you know should any issue arise. A happy new year 2020 to all lilyponders! JM >

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Il giorno ven 27 dic 2019 alle ore 11:21 Wilbert Berendsen ha scritto: > Please give packagers some time to prepare Windows/MacOSX installers, > they will be announced when ready. The Mac installer (DMG containing application bundle) is now available at

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Am 28.12.19 um 01:01 schrieb ma...@masonhock.com: On 12/28, Simon Albrecht wrote: I happen to have a little problem with that as well; here on my Ubuntu 16.04 machine neither apt nor synaptic can find any variation of qtwebengine5. There are several variations of webkit or so, but that’s

Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 3.1 has been released!

Thank you Wilbert and the team. With an existing Ubuntu 19.04 Frescobaldi 3.0.0 installation, all I had to do was install from the tarball and add the following: apt install python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine since the majority of the dependencies I already have in place. I hope this tiny sliver of