Kenneth,
Exactly where do you want to insert the "rit."?
After the "cresc."?
If so, does this work?
\version "2.20.0"
\relative c'' {
c1_\markup {\italic "cresc. rit."} | d | b | c
}
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user
Thank you! It worked! I added "\bold".
Ken
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 8:00 PM Hwaen Ch'uqi wrote:
>
> Greetings Ken,
>
> Not exactly sure what you mean by "simple." I just insert a markup
> where I wish the rit. to begin, as in
>
> _\markup \italic "rit."
>
> HTH,
>
> Hwaen Ch'uqi
>
>
> On 7/5/20,
Greetings Ken,
Not exactly sure what you mean by "simple." I just insert a markup
where I wish the rit. to begin, as in
_\markup \italic "rit."
HTH,
Hwaen Ch'uqi
On 7/5/20, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Looks like I must be missing something obvious in the lilypond docs
> (2.20.2)...
>
Hi;
Looks like I must be missing something obvious in the lilypond docs
(2.20.2)...
How to insert a "rit."?
I saw the following in the "Hiding the extender line for text dynamics" snippet.
\relative c'' {
\override DynamicTextSpanner.style = #'none
\crescTextCresc
c1\< | d | b | c\!
On Jul 5, 2020, at 6:23 PM, Davide Liessi wrote:
> Il giorno ven 3 lug 2020 alle ore 23:48 David F. ha scritto:
>> Frescobaldi is having problems with file paths that have question marks and
>> accented characters.
>
> It should be solved in current master and v3.1.x branches.
> The fix
Il giorno ven 3 lug 2020 alle ore 23:48 David F. ha scritto:
> Frescobaldi is having problems with file paths that have question marks and
> accented characters.
It should be solved in current master and v3.1.x branches.
The fix will appear in future Frescobaldi 3.1.3.
Best wishes.
Davide
Hello,
In general I don't suggest you use the dynamics centered between the staves
for new scores. In my knowledge it is an obsolete engraving practice that
has side effects.
this is * not the truth * but it's * my * knowledge. Of course
I can explain why this practice can be counterproductive,
Greetings claire,
And welcome to LilyPond!
This may not be the kind of answer that you are looking for, but I
thought to throw in my "two cents." In principle, I like the idea of
variables, and I do use them on occasion. But apart from certain
pitchless content, such as dynamics or or unusual
Hi everybody,
I'm a new user (~1 month old) wondering about best practice for score
structure. Let's say I've got a piano score, with two voices per hand, and
the occasional third voice here and there, and all my dynamics between the
two staves of the piano. Then I'll probably write it with :
-
