Since Urs has stepped down for personal reasons, I am willing to
continue the maintenance and development of OLL, as well as promotion
and improvement of documentation and information.
My understanding (perhaps incorrect) is that the Github repo is now
orphaned. I propose to create and manage a
Hello Aaron,
Thanks for pointing out the many ways LilyPond can accomplish something.
Going to play around with those options!
Many thanks,
mattfong
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 6:11 PM Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2020-10-07 11:03 am, Matthew Fong wrote:
> > I suppose I could also use markup on the
OK I see, the solution is to place a space char in the empty string.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 12:30 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2020-10-08 3:03 am, K.L. wrote:
> > Yes, if a global \markup, it can be reserved, but not for the \markup
> > in *\header
> > title*.
>
> My testing shows no change in
On 2020-10-08 3:03 am, K.L. wrote:
Yes, if a global \markup, it can be reserved, but not for the \markup
in *\header
title*.
My testing shows no change in behavior regardless of where the \markup
occurs: at the top-level, in \header, or attached to a note.
Here is a more complete test:
On musicological grounds: certainly C2. In this period, cut-C and C2 were, in
practice, equivalent despite the latter implying "modus cum tempore." Please
don't ask me about _that_, because I'm at the limit of my understanding!
References for this would include:
Apel: The Notation of
Hi Wols,
Ambitus is perfect for me - it's for a wind instrument and for MIDi
sampling info for me.I appreciate finding out about this.
Andrew
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 20:27, Wols Lists wrote:
> This requirement is actually quite common for teaching material. It's
> been a long time ago, but I
Yes, if a global \markup, it can be reserved, but not for the \markup
in *\header
title*.
I checked this in a svg backend result.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:32 PM Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2020-10-07 8:20 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> > If you use { " " } you will get a blank line, in 2.21.6. I
On 08/10/20 01:47, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> Thanks Aaron - that's perfect!
>
> Never had need of that before. A great function.
This requirement is actually quite common for teaching material. It's
been a long time ago, but I remember seeing plenty of pieces for wind
where right at the start
Wow. Fantastic. Thank you! A treasure.
Andrew
On 8/10/2020 5:58 pm, Brett Duncan wrote:
It could well be a 2, looking at this:
https://artscimedia.case.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/135/2020/04/20164113/NotationManual.pdf.
—/contratenor/
Until I find a matching font, this will do.
Thanks again!
On 8/10/20 3:24 pm, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2020-10-07 11:07 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I dont think it's a 2. Looks more like some kind of symbol. I am not a
scholar of that period.
Not a scholar either, but a quick web
It could well be a 2, looking at this:
https://artscimedia.case.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/135/2020/04/20164113/NotationManual.pdf.
On 8/10/20 5:24 pm, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2020-10-07 11:07 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I dont think it's a 2. Looks more like some kind of symbol. I am not a
How is it that I didn't know about that resource?
Thanks a lot!
Side note: That image I posted earlier should of course say
/countertenor/, not /cantus/. Ooops.
On 8/10/20 3:24 pm, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2020-10-07 11:07 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I dont think it's a 2. Looks more like some
On 2020-10-07 11:07 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
I dont think it's a 2. Looks more like some kind of symbol. I am not a
scholar of that period.
Not a scholar either, but a quick web search turned up this [1].
[1]:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/A_Dictionary_of_Music_and_Musicians/Proportion
I dont think it's a 2. Looks more like some kind of symbol. I am not a
scholar of that period.
Andrew
14 matches
Mail list logo
