> Okay, so here's a thing: I don't know this term (let vibrate), and
> if I did, I'm not sure how it would apply in this context (it's a
> tie, right?).
Have you actually looked into the Notation Reference, section 'Ties'?
A few paragraphs after the start of the section you can find
>
> Did you mean to use \laissezVibrer?
>
Apparently that is exactly what I meant! Who knew?
Okay, so here's a thing: I don't know this term (let vibrate), and if I
did, I'm not sure how it would apply in this context (it's a tie,
right?). There is an example in the Snippets under
Robert,
Instead of \repeagtTie use \laissezVibrer.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Mark Probert
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 4:14 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: repeatTie question
Hi.
When I
On 2021-04-29 4:14 pm, Mark Probert wrote:
Hi.
When I compile the following, the tie within the first time bar ends on
the wrong side of the D. Using a tilde (~) instead of \repeatTie
results in an error. Can someone please point me in the right
direction?
TIA
.. mark.
--[start]--
\version
Hi.
When I compile the following, the tie within the first time bar ends on
the wrong side of the D. Using a tilde (~) instead of \repeatTie
results in an error. Can someone please point me in the right direction?
TIA
.. mark.
--[start]--
\version "2.22"
tune = \relative c'' {
\clef
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> Following David Kastrup's suggestion, I wrote some hopefully simple
> examples for \pushToTag and \appendToTag.
>
> I paid the maximum attention to make this code simple and clear but I'm
> sure it contains millions of errors etc. etc.
> It's just a starting point. I
Following David Kastrup's suggestion, I wrote some hopefully simple
examples for \pushToTag and \appendToTag.
I paid the maximum attention to make this code simple and clear but I'm
sure it contains millions of errors etc. etc.
It's just a starting point. I hope it can be useful.
Nota bene: I
Mark Probert writes:
> You wrote:
>>
>> You have an extra pair of braces around your \markup. Consider:
>>
>> -- Aaron Hill
>
> Doh! Many thanks. Absolutely see it now
It's an inviting fallacy to consider braces { } as just grouping, just
like Scheme beginners tend to be tripped up by the
You wrote:
>
> You have an extra pair of braces around your \markup. Consider:
>
> -- Aaron Hill
Doh! Many thanks. Absolutely see it now
.. m.
On 2021-04-28 10:43 pm, Mark Probert wrote:
Hi, all.
I'm getting myself confused. I have an include file -- foo.ily -- and I
want to define different instrument names for later use, like
altoSax = { \markup { \fontsize #-2 {
Alto Saxophone \concat { E { \raise #0.5 \teeny \flat }
10 matches
Mail list logo
