Le 02/01/2022 à 01:06, David Kastrup a écrit :
Jean Abou Samra writes:
Hi all,
There is an ongoing proposal to add syntax highlighting
in LilyPond's documentation. Since it is a notable change
to the documentation reading experience, user feedback would
be appreciated. You can browse a
Hi Jean,
I think it sounds like a really good idea.
Would it be possible to have a menu for changing the highlighting settings to
create some customizability? I'm not familiar with web development at all so I
don't know if this would be difficult to implement.
Good luck!
Calvin Ransom
Calvin
Sorry, that was not meant that way. This was intended to demonstrate the
usefulness of having such an id for the line, no matter if it is a separate
property or a value of details.
(Having one id property for all grobs does seem reasonable.)
About the other thing: It gets more complicated for
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Hi all,
>
> There is an ongoing proposal to add syntax highlighting
> in LilyPond's documentation. Since it is a notable change
> to the documentation reading experience, user feedback would
> be appreciated. You can browse a syntax-highlighted version
> of the notation
Hi all,
There is an ongoing proposal to add syntax highlighting
in LilyPond's documentation. Since it is a notable change
to the documentation reading experience, user feedback would
be appreciated. You can browse a syntax-highlighted version
of the notation manual here:
May I just fan the fire by saying that on kde this works out of the box?
That being said, the only really usable pnc implementation is Frescobaldi, as
that one will keep track while you’re editing the file and thus always point to
the right thing.
And I don’t see much of a problem with
Hello Lib,
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1099
I’ve got a first version up, which easily can do stuff as in the appended file.
The shift on the first one requires a manual override so far.
Cheers,
Valentin
Am Samstag, 1. Jänner 2022, 21:17:52 CET schrieb Lib Lists:
> Hi
Hi Valentin,
wow, thanks, if you have the time that would be great!
To clarify what I mean, here attached is an example made with
Inkscape. I suspect that a dashed line would work better than a
coloured one, but anything that would differentiate the two grid lines
would work.
Cheers,
Lib
On
On 30/12/2021 17:22, David Zelinsky wrote:
In evince on my Ubuntu system, clicking on the note elicits an error,
because evince does not know what to do with a "textedit:..." link.
Section 4.1 of the Usage Manual (under 4. External Programs) explains
how to make it work.
Nor does my Windows
Hello Lib, I think I can implement something for that, give me a day or two.
Cheers,
Valentin
Am Samstag, 1. Jänner 2022, 15:56:18 CET schrieb Lib Lists:
> Hello everybody, and happy new year!
>
> In the example below I would like to add another set of grid lines to
> show the triplet
Hi Jean,
> happy new year!
Happy 2022 to you and yours!
> I've added this example to
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/3415
> I've also posted a workaround
Thanks for doing both of those — your workaround certain beats the five-tweak
edition-engraver injection it replaces. :)
Hello everybody, and happy new year!
In the example below I would like to add another set of grid lines to
show the triplet subdivisions in the lower staff. Moreover, I'd like
to colour the two grid lines differently. I couldn't find any example
and I'm not sure whether this is actually possible.
Well, would not call it reduntant and unnecessary and certainly not stupid. It
served purpose to detect that the German version of the documentation needs an
update at this point, and with the further clarification serves the
German-speaking part of the community which would likely get
Hello Kieren, and happy new year!
Le 31/12/2021 à 04:06, Kieren MacMillan a écrit :
Hi all,
Never mind… I figured it out.
Now on to the bug (?) I actually wanted to ask about. =)
\version "2.23.4"
{
\time 1/4
\override Beam.breakable = ##t
\override Beam.positions = #'(4 . 3)
Hello Hans,
My bad, this must have been changed recently. Knute Snortum asked the same
thing in October, at which point the docs still had the old way. And when I
checked the stupid automatic language selector (why the heck do we have this?)
of course delegated me to the german documentation
Valentin,
your remark confuses me.
In what way is your suggested syntaxt different from what's in the docs?
\relative {
c''4-1 d-2 f\finger \markup \tied-lyric "4~3" c\finger "2 - 3"
}
I only see a few spaces which afaik only icrease readability, but apparently I
overlook something.
Hello Ken, hello David,
the way given in the documentation is not particularly good, as this won't
produce a Fingering grob but a TextScript grob, which cannot be positioned the
same way.
Much better would be to use
e-\finger "5-3"
or
e-\finger\markup\tied-lyric "5~3"
or something.
Cheers,
17 matches
Mail list logo
