HI Valentin;
Thank you for the clarification.
Ken
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 4:37 PM Valentin Petzel wrote:
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> If you want to have a repeat with no alternative just do not use \alternative.
> Doing \repeat something 0 does not do anything. The repeat-count property
> must be at
Thanks, David - for the heads up about Emacs Lilypond mode! I don't use
Emacs for everything, but I do use it for a lot of things; and certainly
for anything involving text (like Lilypond) it's my standard go-to. But
what is it about the Lilypond mode which is so abominable? I just use it
Hi Ken,
If you want to have a repeat with no alternative just do not use \alternative.
Doing \repeat something 0 does not do anything. The repeat-count property
must be at least 1, if you give 0 it defaults to 1.
Of course doing \repeat volta 1 would also be rather stupid, as this would
Hi Jean;
It is obvious that I still have a lot to learn about Lilypond.
I'm very grateful for the work you all do in making Lilypond so
awesome, but also the support on this mailing list is superb!
Thanks so much for your patience with this newbie!
Ken
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:00 PM Jean
Le 12/01/2022 à 23:49, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit :
HI Carl;
There are many pieces of music in the Baroque, Classic and Romantic
periods where the same block of music is repeated without an
alternative.
This particular example is a simplified version/arrangement of a Chopin
Waltz.
The
HI Carl;
There are many pieces of music in the Baroque, Classic and Romantic
periods where the same block of music is repeated without an
alternative.
This particular example is a simplified version/arrangement of a Chopin Waltz.
The problem goes away when I disabled the forced line
On 1/12/22, 3:24 PM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Kenneth Wolcott"
wrote:
Yes, disabling line breaks removes the warning. BTW, repeat volta 0
is in use; is that relevant?
Why would one use \repeat volta 0? It seems to make no sense to repeat a chunk
of music 0 times.
Yes, disabling line breaks removes the warning. BTW, repeat volta 0
is in use; is that relevant?
Thanks again,
Ken
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 2:20 PM Kenneth Wolcott
wrote:
>
> Hi;
>
> Is there a bug in the Lilypond parser regarding bar checks?
>
> It would be nice if Lilypond would let me
Hi;
Is there a bug in the Lilypond parser regarding bar checks?
It would be nice if Lilypond would let me know more specifically
where this warning occurred, shouldn't it know?
I don't see the error in my engraving that would cause this and I'm
having trouble using the 8/16/24/32 to
Paul Scott writes:
> On 1/12/22 11:59, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Paul Scott writes:
>>
>>> On 1/12/22 11:00, David Kastrup wrote:
Paul Scott writes:
> On 1/12/22 08:33, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> (snip)
> Even with the infrequent alignment problem I am quite happy with
>
On 1/12/22 11:59, David Kastrup wrote:
Paul Scott writes:
On 1/12/22 11:00, David Kastrup wrote:
Paul Scott writes:
On 1/12/22 08:33, David Kastrup wrote:
(snip)
Even with the infrequent alignment problem I am quite happy with
lilypond-mode.
Well, I use it. Just wouldn't call my
Paul Scott writes:
> On 1/12/22 11:00, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Paul Scott writes:
>>
>>> On 1/12/22 08:33, David Kastrup wrote:
> (snip)
>>> Even with the infrequent alignment problem I am quite happy with
>>> lilypond-mode.
>> Well, I use it. Just wouldn't call my satisfaction level "quite
On 1/12/22 11:00, David Kastrup wrote:
Paul Scott writes:
On 1/12/22 08:33, David Kastrup wrote:
(snip)
Even with the infrequent alignment problem I am quite happy with
lilypond-mode.
Well, I use it. Just wouldn't call my satisfaction level "quite happy".
Another frequent nuisance is
Paul Scott writes:
> On 1/12/22 08:33, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Paul Scott writes:
>>
On 1/12/22 07:02, David Kastrup wrote:
> Alasdair McAndrew writes:
>
> Emacs' LilyPond-mode is an abomination in desperate need of maintenance
> or possibly rewriting from scratch. There
On 1/12/22 08:33, David Kastrup wrote:
Paul Scott writes:
On 1/12/22 07:02, David Kastrup wrote:
Alasdair McAndrew writes:
Emacs' LilyPond-mode is an abomination in desperate need of maintenance
or possibly rewriting from scratch. There is no reason to use it unless
you are one of those
Forgot to send this to the list.
Paul
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Transposing pitches in the lilypond file itself?
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:20:26 -0700
From: Paul Scott
To: David Kastrup
Can you give examples of what you don't like about Emacs? I've
Alasdair McAndrew writes:
> Thanks, Guy.
>
>
> I use the Linux Emacs editor (which has a lilypond mode), and there
> might be something there, but I was just after a little advice - I
> have used Frescobaldi, but for me Emacs is faster and more efficient.
Emacs' LilyPond-mode is an abomination
Thanks, Leo – I didn’t known about that command so I'll have to experiment with it. Sent from Mail for Windows From: Leo Correia de VerdierSent: Wednesday, 12 January 2022 7:49 PMTo: Mark KnoopCc: Alasdair McAndrew; lilypond-user@gnu.orgSubject: Re: Transposing pitches in the lilypond file itself?
Mark – I've just had a look at python-ly and it appears to be exactly what I was after. Thank you very much! Sent from Mail for Windows From: Mark KnoopSent: Wednesday, 12 January 2022 7:32 PMTo: Alasdair McAndrewCc: lilypond-user@gnu.orgSubject: Re: Transposing pitches in the lilypond file
Depending on how you’ll use it \displayLilyMusic may also be useful.
(Från telefonen)
> 12 jan. 2022 kl. 09:35 skrev Mark Knoop :
>
> You might be interested in python-ly
> (https://python-ly.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) which is actually written by
> the Frescobaldi developers and used
You might be interested in python-ly
(https://python-ly.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) which is actually written by the
Frescobaldi developers and used within it.
This provides a command-line tool that can do transposition (and more) and
shouldn't be too hard to use from within Emacs.
At 05:06
21 matches
Mail list logo
