Re: mixed piano bracket style

Hello Michael, Nothing about the Dynamics context, I just messed up the code for the part if there is no break (why did I not test this?). The appended file fixes this. Also if you want this as a general style it is probably better to put it into a layout or a with block. Cheers, Valentin Am

Re: tagGroup question

Simon Albrecht writes: > Thanks, David and Jean, for your replies. I have no intention to > reopen a can of worms here, and I didn’t remember that discussion > (IIRC, that was at a time when I more regularly kept up with all > LilyPond issues). > > Using \keepWithTag a \keepWithTag b \music is

Re: tagGroup question

Thanks, David and Jean, for your replies. I have no intention to reopen a can of worms here, and I didn’t remember that discussion (IIRC, that was at a time when I more regularly kept up with all LilyPond issues). Using \keepWithTag a \keepWithTag b \music is very reasonable, especially

Re: mixed piano bracket style

Thanks, Valentin. That looks great. However, when I use it in a Dynamics context, I get an error message. Is there something else I would need to do to transplant this to a Dynamics context? I appreciate the work you did to make this. Best, Michael \version "2.23.5" right = \relative c'' { }

Re: Preventing stuff from clashing with ledger lines

Hi Jean, > Perhaps, but this becomes hardly feasible when you > consider > > \version "2.22.1" > > << >{ e' } >\\ >{ \stemDown g,\tweak Y-offset -1.5-. } > >> > > The script position should normally be below the > note, not above it. That happens automatically > if you use

Re: Preventing stuff from clashing with ledger lines

Hi Jean, > Perhaps, but this becomes hardly feasible when you > consider > > \version "2.22.1" > > << >{ e' } >\\ >{ \stemDown g,\tweak Y-offset -1.5-. } > >> > > The script position should normally be below the > note, not above it. That happens automatically > if you use

Re: tagGroup question

David Kastrup writes: > Simon Albrecht writes: > >> Dear list, >> >> I have encountered some unexpected behaviour with tags and >> tagGroups. In the following example, I thought the two staffs should >> look the same, even without the \removeWithTag command, but they >> don’t: >> >>

Re: tagGroup question

Simon Albrecht writes: > Dear list, > > I have encountered some unexpected behaviour with tags and > tagGroups. In the following example, I thought the two staffs should > look the same, even without the \removeWithTag command, but they > don’t: > > > \version "2.23.5" >

Re: trillSpan question:

> On 28 Jan 2022, at 01:03, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > > I have trouble understanding how to implement the \startTrillSpan > and \stopTrillSpan. … > Another related question: what is the difference in the actual > performance of the two types? The trill symbol only applies to the note it is

Re: tagGroup question

Le 28/01/2022 à 13:45, Simon Albrecht a écrit : Dear list, I have encountered some unexpected behaviour with tags and tagGroups. In the following example, I thought the two staffs should look the same, even without the \removeWithTag command, but they don’t:

tagGroup question

Dear list, I have encountered some unexpected behaviour with tags and tagGroups. In the following example, I thought the two staffs should look the same, even without the \removeWithTag command, but they don’t: \version "2.23.5" % tested with 2.23.5 (guile2-build)

Re: Preventing stuff from clashing with ledger lines

Le 28/01/2022 à 08:27, Jefferson Skinny a écrit : Hi, I noticed that grace notes do not follow the same as normal notes. Normally, notes which are placed beyond ledger lines will have longer stems to avoid clashing with them. Certainly, it is possible to tweak the stems individually, but is