Hi Lukas,
Yes, memq is totally safe here and theoretically faster. But the performance
difference is not really noticeable in usual situations. And in my opinion the
whole eq? eqv? and equal? thing is just too confusing for beginners of scheme,
so I opt so sacrifice this small theoretical gain
> Le 6 févr. 2022 à 22:52, Lukas-Fabian Moser
> I'm just still confused as to the terminology of event "classes" vs. event
> "types" etc. But that's something for next week...
Allow me to take advance on next week by an hour, then (in Paris time, that
is). The terms "music class" and
Ties over a line break are parenthesized by default in tablature - I was
wondering if one could also have parenthesized tablature notes for ties
over a bar line.
Thanks for any help.
Stefan
Hi Valentin,
Am 06.02.22 um 20:57 schrieb Valentin Petzel:
one could try something like this.
Yes, thanks, that's what did after David's explanations as well.
In my situation (where I'm using a custom event type not covered by any
standard engravers), I can then dispose of the dedicated
Hello Lukas,
one could try something like this.
Valentin
Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2022, 16:31:31 CET schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
> Folks,
>
> probably I'm being stupid:
>
> \version "2.22"
>
> #(define (test_engraver ctx)
> (make-engraver
> (listeners
> ((tie-event engraver
Hi David,
There is no such thing as an event inside chords. Events are broadcast
specific to a timestep and have no association with individual notes.
Thanks for the explanation! That makes it clear.
Lukas
> Le 6 févr. 2022 à 18:39, Trinton a écrit :
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Since adding dashed slurs to my score using the \slurDashed command, I've
> been unable to concatenate the segments of my score, getting this error:
> [48]ERROR: Wrong type (expecting exact integer): # Trill_spanner_engraver >
>
Hi folks,
Since adding dashed slurs to my score using the \slurDashed command, I've
been unable to concatenate the segments of my score, getting this error:
[48]ERROR: Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #
I've not been able to find any hints about this message in the docs. What's
especially
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
> Folks,
>
> probably I'm being stupid:
>
> \version "2.22"
>
> #(define (test_engraver ctx)
> (make-engraver
> (listeners
> ((tie-event engraver event)
> (format #t "Tie encountered at ~a.\n" (ly:context-current-moment
> ctx))
>
> \layout {
>
Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
What do I have to do to make my custom engraver also see post-events
(here, a tie, but in my context it's a custom event type) used inside
chords?
I had a problem like that with tweaks, because the Tweak_engraver was
called too late. See issue 3296.
I had to
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 2:29 AM Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
>
> When I search on "da capo", "dal segno" I get a huge amount of explanatory
> material in the Lilypond glossary, but I can't find examples of their use,
> or a description of their symbols. I'm sure it's there somewhere ... but
> so far
Folks,
probably I'm being stupid:
\version "2.22"
#(define (test_engraver ctx)
(make-engraver
(listeners
((tie-event engraver event)
(format #t "Tie encountered at ~a.\n" (ly:context-current-moment
ctx))
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\consists #test_engraver
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 1:16 PM Kon Rybnikov wrote:
> Hi
>
> My goal is to run guile with a remote port to use it with Geiser. See
> "Connecting to an external Scheme" [0].
>
> However, I've failed at the very first step of just getting a Guile REPL
> with my lilypond file. I was following the
On 2022-02-06 5:08 am, achar wrote:
P.S.: I already received answers but, they evaporated before I could
read them
You can review the archives [1] if you lose track of a message.
Although, since your original thread is barely two days old, you should
strongly reconsider your service
Eureka...
Yhanks for your answers.
accords =
\chordmode
{
s4.
ees1:maj7 | bes2:m7 ees:7 | aes1:maj7 | aes:dim7 |
g2:m7 c:7 | f:m7 bes:7 | g:m7 c:7 | f:m7 bes:7 |
}
melodie =
{
\clef G
\time 4/4
\key ees\major
\relative c'
{
\partial 4. bes'8 ees f |
\bar"||"
%%
Hello. Here is a piece of code to explain my problem. I would like the
roman numerals of the mib7 chord as well as that of do7 to be located
under the chord names. But the text is associated with a note or a rest
so I can't do it. Does anyone have a solution? Thank you. P.S.: I
already
Hi
My goal is to run guile with a remote port to use it with Geiser. See
"Connecting to an external Scheme" [0].
However, I've failed at the very first step of just getting a Guile REPL
with my lilypond file. I was following the instructions in "Using Guile
interactively with LilyPond" [1]. I've
> Le 6 févr. 2022 à 11:54, Valentin Petzel a écrit :
>
> Thus I think this would be a sensible default. Is there any good reason
> against using this by default?
I wondered about that as well when I split the barNumberVisibility test and
submitted the pending MR to no longer require \bar
Hello Jean,
in my opinion even if Gould did not specify this it is the most obvious
solution to this, that is, the one solution everyone would come up with
immediately.
Thus I think this would be a sensible default. Is there any good reason against
using this by default?
Best,
Valentin
On 2022-02-06 1:37 am, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Are you aware of the options to print a parenthesized bar number at
the start of the line if it's the continuation of a measure? See
input/regression/bar-number-visibility-* (sadly missing documentation
at the moment). I don't have an opinion on
When I search on "da capo", "dal segno" I get a huge amount of explanatory
material in the Lilypond glossary, but I can't find examples of their use,
or a description of their symbols. I'm sure it's there somewhere ... but
so far I can't find where.
How do I insert a "DC al fine" or "Dal
\afterGrace g4(-+ {a16 g16)} }
Richard
On Sun, 2022-02-06 at 09:13 +, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
> Thank you very much! (But in Australia, where I am, it is early
> evening). I did try that, but the difficulty is that I already have
> a symbol attached to the note (which I should have
Sorry for the hour!
It's a matter of parenthesis order and spaces:
\relative c' {
\afterGrace g4-+( { a16 g16) }
}
This works for me
Il dom 6 feb 2022, 10:13 Alasdair McAndrew ha scritto:
> Thank you very much! (But in Australia, where I am, it is early
> evening). I did try that, but the
On Sun, 2022-02-06 at 10:00 +, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
> Thank you! I would never have thought of putting the ending slur
> inside
> the grace note braces - but it works perfectly.
well I got there because it said the error was in column 30, i.e. the
closing ) and I suspected that those
Thank you! I would never have thought of putting the ending slur inside
the grace note braces - but it works perfectly.
Again, thanks.
Alasdair
On Sunday 06 February 2022 20:53:12 (+11:00), Richard Shann wrote:
>
>
> \afterGrace g4(-+ {a16 g16)} }
>
> Richard
>
> On Sun, 2022-02-06 at
> Le 6 févr. 2022 à 10:16, Aaron Hill a écrit :
>
> I have for quite some time just relied on the default behavior where bar
> numbers are printed only for the first measure in each line (save the very
> first measure). This works reasonably well as my musicians are able to
> locate
I have for quite some time just relied on the default behavior where bar
numbers are printed only for the first measure in each line (save the
very first measure). This works reasonably well as my musicians are
able to locate measures by number fairly quickly. However, there is an
issue when
Thank you very much! (But in Australia, where I am, it is early evening).
I did try that, but the difficulty is that I already have a symbol
attached to the note (which I should have included in my example):
\afterGrace g4-+( {a16 g16} )
I've tried moving the beginning of the slur to
Good morning,
try:
\afterGrace g4( { a16 g16) }
The slur event must be attached directly after the note.
Rip_mus
Il dom 6 feb 2022, 08:59 Alasdair McAndrew ha scritto:
> This works:
> g4( \grace {a16 g16})
>
> making a slur which includes the grace notes. But in order to get the
> right
29 matches
Mail list logo
