Re: how to hide dynamics? Only solution is to have a dedicated midi music variable?

If you care a lot about how it sounds then you'll want to import the MIDI into a DAW and make your adjustments there. If you are content with just the MIDI sounds then what I have done in the past is to make a copy of the LilyPond file and make all the adjustments I want to the dynamics on that

Re: color individual characters

Photo examples:Without coloring ---> https://disk.yandex.ru/i/_eI-_vnOA-8gUQAfter coloring ---> https://disk.yandex.ru/i/23EqbLRldy-Yxw 06.06.2022, 04:19, "David Nalesnik" :  On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 8:16 PM David Nalesnik wrote:Hi Dmitry, On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 4:03 PM

Re: color individual characters

Hi David. I managed to color individual UNICODE characters. However, they change their location. Here's a look.Is it possible to cancel their movement when coloring?Links to fonts:1. Ponomar Unicode ———>https://sci.ponomar.net/fonts.html2. Mezenets Unicode ———> 

Re: arbitrary repeat counter

On 06/06/2022 14:10, David Kastrup wrote: Ah. So now if you do a relative repeat, the contents of the braces are converted to absolute before the unfold? That's neat. It never used to be like that, Han Wen wrote that "reset octave" thingy for me yonks ago (2.4?) because I ran in to that very

Re: \spacingTweaks disappears from manuals

Le 06/06/2022 à 19:07, Knute Snortum a écrit : On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 9:37 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote: The commit message might not have been clear enough. \spacingTweaks was not just unused; I don't remove functions not used in LilyPond itself for the sake of removing them (I add tests for

Re: \spacingTweaks disappears from manuals

On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 9:37 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote: > The commit message might not have been clear enough. \spacingTweaks > was not just unused; I don't remove functions not used in LilyPond > itself for the sake of removing them (I add tests for them instead). > \spacingTweaks was just

Re: \spacingTweaks disappears from manuals

Le 06/06/2022 à 18:24, Knute Snortum a écrit : I noticed that \spacingTweaks disappeared from the manuals in v2.23. Looking through the commits, I find this by Jean: https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/commit/fcf9604b0322310a26818a3a3b3f820ffb329a60 It basically says that \spacingTweaks was

\spacingTweaks disappears from manuals

I noticed that \spacingTweaks disappeared from the manuals in v2.23. Looking through the commits, I find this by Jean: https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/commit/fcf9604b0322310a26818a3a3b3f820ffb329a60 It basically says that \spacingTweaks was unsed and undocumented, so he removed it. This

Re: Score header and top-level markup

Hi Jean, thanks once more for the speedy and helpful reply! On 06/06/2022 14:43, Jean Abou Samra wrote: How can I change that? That sounds like an XY question. Sorry about that. I meant to imply: How do I swap the placement of the headers? What is the use case? Having a large,

Re: Why isn't VoiceTwo flipping the stems down?

On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 1:22 PM Thomas Morley wrote: > Am So., 5. Juni 2022 um 17:32 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup : > > > Alternatively it may make sense to work through the "Learning Manual" of > > LilyPond once (or at least its first chapters) to get a first grasp of > > how things are supposed to

Re: arbitrary repeat counter

Wols Lists writes: >> What do you mean? Something like >> \relative { >>   \repeat unfold 2 { c' g' } >> } >> gives the attached output. As you can see, notes are made >> relative in order without taking the repeat into account, >> so both repeats play at the same octave. This is not >>

Re: Score header and top-level markup

Le 06/06/2022 à 14:32, Simon Albrecht a écrit : Hi everyone, %%% \version "2.23.9" \bookpart {   \markup \fontsize #10 "general title"   \header {     title = "specific title"   }   \score {     { 1 }   } } why does "general title" appear below "specific title"

Score header and top-level markup

Hi everyone, %%% \version "2.23.9" \bookpart {   \markup \fontsize #10 "general title"   \header {     title = "specific title"   }   \score {     { 1 }   } } why does "general title" appear below "specific title" and not above? How can I change that? Best,

Re: Owners of GitHub openlilylib organisation

Le 06/06/2022 à 13:00, Andrew Bernard a écrit : Not exactly just fork . The use of an organisation in github is important I believe. I suppose it is silly but I wanted the name openlilylib for the org, and also to preserve all the users etc, but now it will have to be oll. How about

Re: arbitrary repeat counter

On 06/06/2022 11:46, Jean Abou Samra wrote: Le 06/06/2022 à 12:17, Wols Lists a écrit : On 01/06/2022 18:03, Simon Bailey wrote: Here's a weird one. Using this definition in the c,-octave, I get a really weird output. Each note in the music drops down an octave. In the c-octave, it works

Re: Owners of GitHub openlilylib organisation

Not exactly just fork . The use of an organisation in github is important I believe. I suppose it is silly but I wanted the name openlilylib for the org, and also to preserve all the users etc, but now it will have to be oll. Andrew Jean Abou Samra wrote on 6/06/2022 8:47 PM: Well, I guess

Re: Owners of GitHub openlilylib organisation

Le 06/06/2022 à 07:35, Andrew Bernard a écrit : Yes, I already wrote to him. No reply and no bounce. So I can see who the owners are from github, but asking if they are still on here. Well, I guess the way to go for you is to fork OLL at this point.

Re: arbitrary repeat counter

Le 06/06/2022 à 12:17, Wols Lists a écrit : On 01/06/2022 18:03, Simon Bailey wrote: Here's a weird one. Using this definition in the c,-octave, I get a really weird output. Each note in the music drops down an octave. In the c-octave, it works normally. Using the untagged version of

Re: arbitrary repeat counter

On 01/06/2022 18:03, Simon Bailey wrote: Here's a weird one. Using this definition in the c,-octave, I get a really weird output. Each note in the music drops down an octave. In the c-octave, it works normally. Using the untagged version of \repeatCounting doesn't show this issue in either

Re: Three slurs from a single voice to three voices?

Hi Kevin, On 02/06/2022 22:56, Kevin Cole wrote: The hand-written score I'm looking at shows an F# with three slurs coming off of it going to each of the three notes in the following measure. I tried the following but it only shows one slur. What did I miss? without context it’s hard to tell