Re: LilyPond 2.23.11

Le 25/07/2022 à 00:36, Jean Abou Samra a écrit : Le 25/07/2022 à 00:32, Knute Snortum a écrit : Okay, it's even stranger than I thought. It's this URL: https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/web/unix ...but the only way I can get to it is:

Re: LilyPond 2.23.11

Le 25/07/2022 à 00:32, Knute Snortum a écrit : Okay, it's even stranger than I thought. It's this URL: https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/web/unix ...but the only way I can get to it is: https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation -> web -> download -> unix. It must be a Google

Re: LilyPond 2.23.11

-- Knute Snortum On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 2:08 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > > > Le 24/07/2022 à 22:33, Knute Snortum a écrit : > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 1:25 PM Knute Snortum wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 10:44 AM Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user > >> discussion wrote: > >>> We are

Re: LilyPond 2.23.11

Le 24/07/2022 à 22:33, Knute Snortum a écrit : On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 1:25 PM Knute Snortum wrote: On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 10:44 AM Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user discussion wrote: We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.11. This is termed a development release, but these

Re: LilyPond 2.23.11

On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 1:25 PM Knute Snortum wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 10:44 AM Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user > discussion wrote: > > > > We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.11. This is > > termed a development release, but these are usually reliable. However, > >

Re: LilyPond 2.23.11

On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 10:44 AM Jonas Hahnfeld via LilyPond user discussion wrote: > > We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.11. This is > termed a development release, but these are usually reliable. However, > if you require stability, we recommend using version 2.22.2, the >

LilyPond 2.23.11

We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.11. This is termed a development release, but these are usually reliable. However, if you require stability, we recommend using version 2.22.2, the current stable release. Please refer to the Installing section in the Learning Manual for

Re: A new Scheme tutorial (Jean Abou Samra)

Le 24/07/2022 à 17:19, Ernie Braganza a écrit : I am joining this conversation late, so how do I access the scheme tutorial? Here: https://scheme-tutorial.readthedocs.io/ Best, Jean

Re: A new Scheme tutorial (Jean Abou Samra)

I am joining this conversation late, so how do I access the scheme tutorial? On Sun, Jul 24, 2022, 7:30 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > > Ouch! I see what you mean. And this is meant to be simplified? But the > > problem really is that if a user tries to use an identifier with an > > illegal

\repeat segno

I am gradually trying to domesticate lily 2.23.10, and I discover \repeat segno. I base myself on the following pages: https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/notation/long-repeats.fr.html#segno-repeat-appearance https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/internals/jump_005fengraver but

Re: Ties between voices

Andrew, did you get a chance to try Lukas-Fabian's extension yet? Was it working for you or were there something wrong? -William On 7/23/22 18:03, Andrew Bernard wrote: Gosh. There's no 'smell'. In piano music that has polyphony it is very common, and indeed necessary  to tie across voices.

Help needed with arranger.ly

I need some help to get this nice program really running. I read the manual several times,studied NOTES.ly etcetera and now able to get the first parts of music on the correct place. :-) (I am using a score with 6 instruments and I am trying to arrange this or other combination

Re: A new Scheme tutorial (Jean Abou Samra)

Ouch! I see what you mean. And this is meant to be simplified? But the problem really is that if a user tries to use an identifier with an illegal syntax, how do they know? This is rather like those really annoying websites which ask you to choose a password, and then tell you that it's

Re: A new Scheme tutorial (Jean Abou Samra)

- Saturday, July 23, 2022, 8:56:57 PM, Jean Abou Samra wrote: > Thanks a lot Peter and others (privately) for your suggestions. > Sorry for the very late reply, I've been distracted by other > things. Your comments are most appreciated. > Le 13/07/2022 à 18:15, Peter