Le 17/11/2022 à 08:06, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
* In the first pass, typeset everything without stuff marked for a
follow-up pass.
Namely, typeset all notes?
Yes.
But how do you take into account the constraints from lyrics here?
That is the whole problem.
They should be completely
>> * In the first pass, typeset everything without stuff marked for a
>> follow-up pass.
>
> Namely, typeset all notes?
Yes.
> But how do you take into account the constraints from lyrics here?
> That is the whole problem.
They should be completely ignored. My idea was to make the first
> By the way, shouldn't \with-dimension(-from) be documented here
> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/notation/dimensions.html
> ?
I don't think so. However, it makes probably sense to mention related
markup commands in the 'See also' section.
Do you volunteer for a MR? :-)
Yes! Thanks Jean, I don't know why I didn't see this myself.
Cheers!
L
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, 00:27 Jean Abou Samra, wrote:
> Le 16/11/2022 à 23:44, Luca Fascione a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> > is there a way to run the chord naming logic from two voices (in my
> > case bass and guitar comping part)
Le 16/11/2022 à 23:44, Luca Fascione a écrit :
Hi all,
is there a way to run the chord naming logic from two voices (in my
case bass and guitar comping part) together?
I have written-out guitar parts with rootless chords, and the roots
are in the double bass parts, and was hoping I could
Hi all,
is there a way to run the chord naming logic from two voices (in my case
bass and guitar comping part) together?
I have written-out guitar parts with rootless chords, and the roots are in
the double bass parts, and was hoping I could quickly recover a starting
point of a progression from
Le 16/11/2022 à 21:45, Greg Lindstrom a écrit :
Hello all -
I am working on a score in Lilypond 2.22.1 and believe I saw,
somewhere, a notation to use in the programming of the notes to repeat
the previous measure of notes. Not in the music, I use the various
repeats all the time; this is in
Actually, I see now that line spanners also support absolute
shifts (I didn't remember that, in spite of having worked on
that code ...). So, just do
\version "2.23.81"
{
f'1
~
- \tweak style #'line
- \tweak bound-details.left.stencil-offset #'(0 . -0.4)
- \tweak
Thank you,
Paul
On 11/16/22 12:45 PM, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Le 16/11/2022 à 19:01, Paul Scott a écrit :
I still would appreciate help adding the coda.
I will attach my last attempt again,
You need to put \once \set ... just at the point where the
"D.C." text appears. In your example,
Thank you! I would've never been able to figure that out by myself! By the
way, shouldn't \with-dimension(-from) be documented here
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/notation/dimensions.html ?
This is a good snippet for the repository, I think (I actually wonder why
this is not the
Hello all -
I am working on a score in Lilypond 2.22.1 and believe I saw, somewhere, a
notation to use in the programming of the notes to repeat the previous
measure of notes. Not in the music, I use the various repeats all the time;
this is in the editor when I am coding the notes so I would not
Le 16/11/2022 à 16:26, Martín Rincón Botero a écrit :
Hello, the following code produces text on both sides of the spanner
that looks vertically well aligned with the upper limit of its box
instead of the inferior one:
{
f'1
~
- \tweak style #'line
- \tweak
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le 16/11/2022 à 10:05, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>> I draw my idea from LaTeX, for example handling multi-page tables (see
>> the 'longtable' package).
>
>
> I looked at the documentation
>
Le 16/11/2022 à 19:01, Paul Scott a écrit :
I still would appreciate help adding the coda.
I will attach my last attempt again,
You need to put \once \set ... just at the point where the
"D.C." text appears. In your example, this means:
\version "2.23.81"
music = {
\repeat segno 2 {
Le 16/11/2022 à 10:05, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
I draw my idea from LaTeX, for example handling multi-page tables (see
the 'longtable' package).
I looked at the documentation
(https://distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr/pub/mirrors/ctan/macros/latex/required/tools/longtable.pdf).
The footnote on
I still would appreciate help adding the coda.
I will attach my last attempt again,
Thank you,
Paul
On 11/16/22 07:59, Paul Scott wrote:
On 11/16/22 00:21, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Was it intentional to reply off-list?
No.
Le 16/11/2022 à 07:20, Paul Scott a écrit :
On 11/15/22 3:18
On Wed 16 Nov 2022 at 06:21:41 (-0500), Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>
> >> What about creating all the parts for a score? I certainly
> >> don't want to type all the common structure in each part.
> > If you type the structure first, then as you use emacs, it's easy to
> > copy and paste sufficient
Hello, the following code produces text on both sides of the spanner that
looks vertically well aligned with the upper limit of its box instead of
the inferior one:
{
f'1
~
- \tweak style #'line
- \tweak bound-details.left.stencil-align-dir-y #CENTER
- \tweak bound-details.right.arrow
On 11/16/22 00:21, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Was it intentional to reply off-list?
No.
Le 16/11/2022 à 07:20, Paul Scott a écrit :
On 11/15/22 3:18 PM, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Le 15/11/2022 à 23:16, Paul Scott a écrit :
I'm not finding a place to put that where it works. I get the
default
Le 16/11/2022 à 12:21, Kieren MacMillan a écrit :
What about creating all the parts for a score? I certainly
don't want to type all the common structure in each part.
If you type the structure first, then as you use emacs, it's easy to
copy and paste sufficient copies of it before you enter the
> On 16 Nov 2022, at 00:41, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>
> I have never had a Windows app certified, but I don't think there is any
> cost associated with it, it's just a process at Microsoft. This sort of
> signing in not a TLS certificate possibly involving cost (though most people
> use
Hi all,
>> What about creating all the parts for a score? I certainly
>> don't want to type all the common structure in each part.
> If you type the structure first, then as you use emacs, it's easy to
> copy and paste sufficient copies of it before you enter the notes.
Okay… but yet another
>> I think that such a fine granularity of automatic lyric adjustment
>> would only be possible with LilyPond doing (at least) two
>> typesetting passes, if at all.
>
> Can you elaborate? What would it help with?
I draw my idea from LaTeX, for example handling multi-page tables (see
the
> Le 16 nov. 2022 à 09:36, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>
> I think that such a fine granularity of automatic lyric adjustment
> would only be possible with LilyPond doing (at least) two typesetting
> passes, if at all.
Can you elaborate? What would it help with?
> In general, implementing
> The main problematic measures are 5, 7, and 9/10. My tweaks are
> good bandaids, but not ideal, nor perfect, but they get the job
> done.
I think that such a fine granularity of automatic lyric adjustment
would only be possible with LilyPond doing (at least) two typesetting
passes, if at all.
25 matches
Mail list logo
