Re: rests in chord symbols with volta endings

> > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Flaming Hakama by Elaine > To: Lilypond-User Mailing List > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:19:36 -0700 > Subject: rests in chord symbols with volta endings > Hi, > > I was trying to use https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=529 >

Beginner question about writing for drums

Hi, I'm just getting started with lilypond so I hope this issue is not obvious. As I'm playing the drums, many tutorials I found regarding lilypond do not quite apply in the details. So far the two things I've found are https://lilypondcookbook.com/toc and the docs

ragged-bottom

I’ve set in paper block “ragged-bottom = ##t”. Can I change it for a couple of pages to ##f ? Thanks!

Re: rests in chord symbols with volta endings

Le mercredi 26 avril 2023 à 23:43 +0200, Jean Abou Samra a écrit : > structure = { > \repeat volta 2 { > s1 > } > \alternative { > { s1 } > { s1 } > } > } By the way: regarding the above, I invite you to read the thread

Re: rests in chord symbols with volta endings

Le mercredi 26 avril 2023 à 14:19 -0700, Flaming Hakama by Elaine a écrit : > Hi,  > > I was trying to use  > [https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=529](https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=529) > to add some rests to chord symbols > > After using convert-ly it worked as is. > > However,

rests in chord symbols with volta endings

Hi, I was trying to use https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=529 to add some rests to chord symbols After using convert-ly it worked as is. However, when using this in the context of repeat voltas, chords in the endings appear above the ending lines, rather than below as normal. Does anyone

Re: Separate dynamics from notes

You can do like this if it’s useful to you, removing the engravers that read what you don’t want at a specific place. %% \version "2.25.1" rh = \fixed c' {c4\pp d\p e\f f\ff} \score { << \new Voice \with { \remove Dynamic_engraver } \rh \new Dynamics %Dynamics

Separate dynamics from notes

First question Suppose I wrote this score: \version "2.25.2" rh = \fixed c' {c4\pp d\p e\f f\ff} \score { \new Staff \rh } Is there any "automatic" way to extract the dynamics in the score (maybe assigning it to a variable)? At the end I would like to easily transform the previous code in

Re: Default beam exceptions for 4/4

> On 26 Apr 2023, at 18:04, David Poon wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 at 08:35, Hans Aikema > wrote: >> >> >>> On 26 Apr 2023, at 17:06, Mats Bengtsson >> > wrote: >>> >>>  >>> On 2023-04-26 16:39, Michael Werner wrote: \version

Re: Default beam exceptions for 4/4

On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 at 08:35, Hans Aikema wrote: > > > On 26 Apr 2023, at 17:06, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > >  > On 2023-04-26 16:39, Michael Werner wrote: > > \version "2.25.4" > > > \new Staff = "main" { > > > \overrideTimeSignatureSettings > > 4/4% timeSignatureFraction - i.e. the

Re: Default beam exceptions for 4/4

> On 26 Apr 2023, at 17:06, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > >  >> On 2023-04-26 16:39, Michael Werner wrote: >> \version "2.25.4" >> >> \new Staff = "main" { >> >> \overrideTimeSignatureSettings >> 4/4% timeSignatureFraction - i.e. the time signature >> 1/4% baseMomentFraction

Re: Default beam exceptions for 4/4

On 2023-04-26 16:39, Michael Werner wrote: \version "2.25.4" \new Staff = "main" {   \overrideTimeSignatureSettings   4/4        % timeSignatureFraction - i.e. the time signature   1/4        % baseMomentFraction - what note duration to base this on   1,1,1,1        % beatStructure - this is

Re: Default beam exceptions for 4/4

Hi David, Looks like what you want is \overrideTimeSignatureSettings Details on how it works can be found at http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/notation/time-signature#index-_005coverrideTimeSignatureSettings But a basic example is as follows: \version "2.25.4" \new Staff = "main" {

Default beam exceptions for 4/4

Is it possible to set automatic beaming in 4/4 time such that 4 4 8[ 8 8 8] but 4 4. 8 8[ 8] ? (i.e., I'd like to beam 8ths together in twos or fours, but never threes) (The only previous message I saw on this topic didn't appear to be answered: