>> > So why would overriding the dynamic line spanner's
>> > outside-staff-priority change where the forte goes? Isn't it
>> > DynamicText? If anyone can clear this up for me, I would be very
>> > appreciative.
>>
>> When there are consecutive dynamics like \p \< ... \f \> ... \pp,
>> they need
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 6:33 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> > So why would overriding the dynamic line spanner's outside-staff-priority
> > change where the forte goes? Isn't it DynamicText? If anyone can clear
> this
> > up for me, I would be very appreciative.
>
> When there are consecutive
I have struggled with this one in the past and gave up in the end. There
are some tweaks I found on the archived threads but I found it easier to
enter the segnoMark and codaMark manually. Ditto for the"D.S. al Coda"
(which is what I think you mean in your example. I often edit big band and
small
> So why would overriding the dynamic line spanner's outside-staff-priority
> change where the forte goes? Isn't it DynamicText? If anyone can clear this
> up for me, I would be very appreciative.
When there are consecutive dynamics like \p \< ... \f \> ... \pp, they
need to be all vertically
I am confused. While trying to find a way to move a forte mark up onto the
staff, I came across some very counter-intuitive code:
%%%
\version "2.24.3"
{
% Why does this work...
\once \override DynamicLineSpanner.outside-staff-priority = ##f
\once \override DynamicLineSpanner.Y-offset =
Segno repeat structure is like a black box to me. I have been
relatively successful with help and trial and error.
I would really appreciate some help with this that I need soon:
From NR 2.25.16 1.4.1, Segno repeat structure/alla coda, how do I add a
repeat with alternative so the coda jump
Thank you all for your suggestions. I finally have the flag working after
years of just editing my master file when I wanted one track per voice!
Thanks,
Carolyn
> On May 20, 2024, at 6:09 AM, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
>> nostaffmidi =
>> #(define-scheme-function () ()
>> (if
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Alternatively, you can do it more like you were envisioning, but for
> technical reasons, you have to start the Scheme code with $ , not # ,
> and you also have to include an extra \midi { } around the \context
> blocks (basically because \context outside \layout or
Am So., 19. Mai 2024 um 21:28 Uhr schrieb Carolyn Beeton
:
>
> I would like to include some Staff and Voice context settings in the \midi
> block only if a flag is set to ##t and I have not been able to figure out how
> to do this. When I try to wrap the \context blocks in a code block with
>
> nostaffmidi =
> #(define-scheme-function () ()
>(if TrackPerVoice #{ \context { \Staff \remove "Staff_performer" } #}))
Ah, that proves me wrong. I didn't recall the parser was smart enough for this.
> Although, I don't understand why the contents of the scheme functions cannot
> be
> I would like to include some Staff and Voice context settings in the
> \midi block only if a flag is set to ##t and I have not been able to
> figure out how to do this. When I try to wrap the \context blocks
> in a code block with #{…#} I get this error:
> trackPerVoiceMWE.ly:31:16: error:
On 19/05/2024 20:27, Carolyn Beeton wrote:
I would like to include some Staff and Voice context settings in the \midi
block only if a flag is set to ##t and I have not been able to figure out how
to do this. When I try to wrap the \context blocks in a code block with #{…#}
I get this error:
> I run into a problem when I create a (very high) single-page PDF file from a
> Lilypond score. 'After a certain time', the rest of the page is rendered in
> white.
>
> In my use case, I wanted to make a large system staff, and white-on-black
> music, because of readability-reasons.
Hi,
I run into a problem when I create a (very high) single-page PDF file from
a Lilypond score. 'After a certain time', the rest of the page is rendered
in white.
In my use case, I wanted to make a large system staff, and white-on-black
music, because of readability-reasons. Specifically:
14 matches
Mail list logo