Rafael González wrote:
I turned alaptop I have into Linux ( Fedora). I am a neophyte at this.
I downloaded lilypon and the automatic reader cannot deal with
it./ /iI presume there must be a set of commands or script which will
install lilypon? it is a .sh file.
There is a Lilypond 2.10.33
I'm running into build errors when attempting to build version 2.10.25
in the Fedora development build system. It builds fine on a Fedora 7
system. The failure appears to be related to fontforge. Fedora 7 has
fontforge 20061220, and the development (future Fedora 8) is now at
20070511. The end
I'm the lilypond packager for Fedora, and recently received a bug report
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225410) that the
lilypond entries in the main info file /usr/share/info are trying to
find the info files in /usr/share/info/lilypond. If I just want them all
luis jure wrote:
hello list,
i can't compile either 2.10.2 or 2.10.3 on my gentoo linux (everything
went fine with 2.8.8). the problem is that configure doesn't detect
correctly the versions of guile and mftrace. configure stops thus:
ERROR: Please install required programs: guile-config =
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Johan Vromans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's also in Fedora Core 5.
Klaas, if you need a wordk-around just email me.
Workaround? Why isn't this fixed in Fedora?
[Where is LilyPond's bug page with Fedora, I cannot find the word Bug
on
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Quentin Spencer escreveu:
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Johan Vromans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's also in Fedora Core 5.
Klaas, if you need a wordk-around just email me.
Workaround? Why isn't this fixed in Fedora
Trevor Bača wrote:
On 7/5/06, Stewart Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest that you start a discussion thread on mutopia's mailing
lists:
If
you have constructive ideas on how to create an archive of
high-quality
public domain notes, then I would strongly recommend you to use
your
Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 08:26:06PM +, Davide Castellone wrote:
Why doesn't the Lilypond installer seem to be compressed? With
my very slow 56k Internet connection I find the source-tarball
(about 2.5 MB) more easy to download than the installer for
GNU/Linux (11
Roman V. Isaev wrote:
On 06/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
/usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: error while loading shared
libraries: /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libfreetype.so.6: cannot
restore segment prot after reloc: Permission denied
What's wrong?
Never seen this
I mentioned on this list a while ago that I was trying to get lilypond
into Fedora Extras. The first packages were released yesterday and they
should now be installable using yum install lilypond. There is also a
lilypond-doc package available with the HTML docs. Right now these are
only
Hello everyone,
I'm an occasional user of lilypond, and new to this list. I'm also the
maintainer of a few packages in Fedora Extras, and I'm considering
submitting lilypond for inclusion there. Initially I built everything
(version 2.8.1) from source and I ran into the PDF file size problem
11 matches
Mail list logo
