Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

2018-03-14 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Please find attached the proofsheet I'm planning to attach to the > issue tracker (if nothing dreadful happens). There's also a concise > test of \chordmode and note entry. MIDI output isn't contained, but > it's working as it should. > > issue3356-proofsheet.pdf >

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

2018-03-14 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Version 2: Abrahams equalized flats: > test-issue3356-condensed.pdf > > Thanks. And this is still my preferred version. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lil

Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

2018-03-13 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Nice work! > 2. Abraham's equally compressed flats > > Both flats are equally compressed as a compromise, thus keeping the > original glyph width: > > > This is my favourite. Werner

Re: Build error. MergeFonts: Can't find font: feta11.pfb

2018-03-11 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Invoking "t1asm parmesan-noteheads14.pt1 parmesan-noteheads14.pfb"... > mf2pt1: You'll need either to install t1utils and rerun mf2pt1 or find > another way to convert parmesan-noteheads14.pt1 to > parmesan-noteheads14.pfb > […] > > t1utils (including t1asm) are installed in the correct version

Re: Tromba "mo"

2018-02-09 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Just out of curiosity - shouldn't it be "tromba prim*a*/second*a*" > in Italian (1ma/2da)? Indeed. > Or is it a case of "modo russico" ;) Hehe, I think you are right :-) Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://list

Re: Tromba "mo"

2018-02-09 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>> I've got a manuscript with two "Trombas" - in "mo" and "do". Obviously, the other one is `II do' – Tromba secondo :-) Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Tromba "mo"

2018-02-09 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> a 18th century cantata - I found (very few) links with google where > you can see "Tromba I mo" "Oboe I mo" and "Cornu I mo"  - so its not a > typo... Uh, oh, this means `Tromba primo', `first Tromba', so please forget what I talked about solmisation :-) Werner ___

Re: Tromba "mo"

2018-02-09 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> What MS, what context? I don't know of 'mo' in any tonic sol fa. `mo' is a term from (German?) `relative solmisation', cf. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solmisation#Relative_Solmisation However, I have never seen this in any score... >> I've got a manuscript with two "Trombas" - in "mo" an

Re: Tweaking Hairpin shape

2018-02-06 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Sure, I attached a few from here > Thanks, but in this score there is not a single heavily rotated hairpin; I would say that the differences are not of any importance. > . Oh, and an orche

Re: Tweaking Hairpin shape

2018-02-05 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I wanted to make it so that the two lines that form the hairpin > would end in the same vertical line, Please show a real-world example for that. I can't remember having ever seen this... Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu

Re: Font names convention

2018-01-18 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> When in the .tex file I write > >   \setmainfont{Adobe Garamond Pro} > > the font is correctly used, but the "fullname" I get out of the Lua > object is "AGaramondPro-Regular". This looks like the PostScript name. > This is also what is shown in the properties of the PDF, but with > differen

Re: Issues about optical spacing

2018-01-16 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I [...] submit this article which discusses the topic in detail. > > https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cache//b/b/p/bbp2372.2002.097/bbp2372.2002.097.pdf#page=2;zoom=75 > > I would love to see Lilypond incorporate this improved algorithm > [...] This sounds like an interesting GSoC project! Han-Wen

Re: Crop only top and bottom

2018-01-16 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I have looked for ways to crop the EPS to only two borders of the > bounding box but didn't find anything useful so far. While I can't help with the lilypond issue, I suggest to have a look at the `pdfcrop' program that comes with TeXLive: It supports a `--margins' option. Werner ___

Re: getting paid for an include (I offer)

2017-12-29 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> ??? Are you really trying to reactivate Neue Deutsche >> Orgeltabulatur, three hundred years after it was abandonded? > > There can be multiple reasons why one would do that: [...] All of these are valid points. However, it seems to me that he wants to actually *add* features to this tablatu

Re: getting paid for an include (I offer)

2017-12-28 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> sadly, you are right. I had a closer look at what I thought to be an > ''es'' but is a ''dis'', > > Nevertheless, in my idea it should be the user who would choose > alternatives (historical (only sharps and b), my-way (flats, sharps > and even double-falts and d-sharps), and alternative. ???

Re: getting paid for an include (I offer)

2017-12-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> About the flat in the new german TAB, AFAIK there doesn't exist a flat at all in the Neue Deutsche Orgeltabulatur. > I would be pleased if you confirm me, or not: in Scheidemann's > Judentanz, I read the (recurrent) es as it is and not as a s. I don't understand this sentence. Please rephras

Re: getting paid for an include (I offer)

2017-12-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabulatur#Neue_deutsche_Orgeltabulatur > > Hi, I would be interested maybe; coincidentally I’m just now reading > Willi Apel’s book on notation and the next chapter I’ll read is > about the old and the new German organ tab. It's an interesting topic indeed – even

Re: getting paid for an include (I offer)

2017-12-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>> I would like to use the keyboard TAB >>> (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabulatur) as alternative to "normal" >>> notation. >> >> Which one? There are so many tablutures. Please give an example >> (i.e., the `normal' notation and the tablature version). > > Excuse me, the New German Tabulatu

Re: getting paid for an include (I offer)

2017-12-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I would like to use the keyboard TAB > (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabulatur) as alternative to "normal" > notation. Which one? There are so many tablutures. Please give an example (i.e., the `normal' notation and the tablature version). Werner __

Re: variable

2017-11-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> I'm sorry for the trivial question but why this code is wrong? >> >> \version "2.19.80" >> >> music = {a b} >> \music >> >> >> My understanding was that "\music" is substituted by its value "{a >> b}" > > You need to put anything in between. LilyPond looks at \music > before deciding the

Re: Markings on a percent bar

2017-11-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> The problem, from my point of view, is that lilypond syntax is > simple and makes sense to me. As soon as scheme gets involved, the > learning curve is like hitting a cliff. Are you aware of Urs's introduction to Scheme? https://scheme-book.ursliska.de Werner _

Re: Scheme help? snippet for movement page headers

2017-11-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Oh ugh, Nabble wrapped my lines and now it's all ugly. :( One of the reasons to avoid source code lines longer than, say 78 characters... Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypon

Re: [OT] Linux Users

2017-11-19 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> It just can't handle Khmer lyric. This is not a lilypond issue at all, AFAIC. I guess that the used Pandoc and HarfBuzz library versions are not recent enough. Please send me a small lilypond example with Khmer lyrics, together with an image that shows how the text should look like (using the

Re: How about a StaffGroup containing a single Staff?

2017-11-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Are there situations when a brace should be produced for such a > single staff staff group, and if so, how can that be obtained? See the snippet section in http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/displaying-staves#grouping-staves how to achieve that. Werner

Re: Tuplets curved brackets?

2017-11-14 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> How can one undo the effect of tupletBracketToSlur to use it on a > per-tuplet basis? Prefixing it with \once is not a solution I’ve > seen. Try `\single'. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailma

Re: shifting spanners horizontally

2017-11-06 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> the horizontal position of ordinary grobs can be adjusted with >> >> \tweak X-offset ... >> >> or something similar. What's the equivalent for spanners to shift >> the beginning and/or the end horizontally? A quick search in both >> the documentation and the internet didn't yield something

shifting spanners horizontally

2017-11-03 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Folks, the horizontal position of ordinary grobs can be adjusted with \tweak X-offset ... or something similar. What's the equivalent for spanners to shift the beginning and/or the end horizontally? A quick search in both the documentation and the internet didn't yield something significan

Re: Suggestions for page layout

2017-10-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Peter, I will also look at pdfbook to see how it compares to pdftk > and whether that is more appropriate to incorporate. Please note that unfortunately there is a high probability that pdftk will soon be no longer part of common GNU/Linux distributions. Reason is that this toolbox (written in

Re: Overly large text font size issue

2017-10-07 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>> I doubt this is a problem with LilyPond per se — possibly trouble >>> lies within my environment — but lately I've encountered something >>> very strange: font size for text has exploded when I compile >>> LilyPond files that used to look fine in the past using the very >>> same LilyPond versi

Re: Ties between voices?

2017-10-07 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I've got one I can't quite get right. I would like the tie from the > upper B whole note to be up instead of down. [...] Without looking at your example: Use `_~' and `^~' instead of `~' to immediately specify a tie's direction. Werner ___ li

Re: automatic partwriter

2017-09-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I've attached the beginning of an automatic partwriter. [...] Nice! Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: multiple \keys and \time problem

2017-09-04 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>> The idea is to make `supressRedundantKeySigs' set an >>> `is-redundant' flag in the redundant grob instead of calling >>> `ly:grob-suicide!'. A modified stencil function for KeySignature >>> can now check this flag together with `ly:item-break-dir' to >>> suppress the grob if necessary. > >

Re: multiple \keys and \time problem

2017-09-03 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> I wonder whether it makes sense to provide this behaviour as the >> default for lilypond. Or to ask differently: Is there any practical >> use of having redundant calls to \time or \key actually print a time >> or key signature again? > > 1. The way the current "multi-instrumentalist" mechani

Re: multiple \keys and \time problem

2017-09-03 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> The idea is to make `supressRedundantKeySigs' set an `is-redundant' > flag in the redundant grob instead of calling `ly:grob-suicide!'. A > modified stencil function for KeySignature can now check this flag > together with `ly:item-break-dir' to suppress the grob if necessary. I wonder whether

Re: multiple \keys and \time problem

2017-09-01 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> Thanks a lot! However, below you can find one case (using your >> second, improved version) where it is failing: the key signature at >> the beginning of a line gets canceled, which is incorrect.. > > Ofcourse, I should have thought of this. > > I'll have a look - my holidays ended, though :

Re: multiple \keys and \time problem

2017-08-31 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> after David Nalesnik's suppressRedundantTimeSig-engraver, c/p > unchanged, > http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg72628.html I > coded a suppressRedundantKeySig-engraver. Thanks a lot! However, below you can find one case (using your second, improved version) where it is failin

multiple \keys and \time problem

2017-08-30 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Folks, is it possible to make lilypond ignore multiple occurrences of \key or \time if they don't actually change the current key or time? Having \relative c' { \key d \major \time 2/2 d1 | d1 | \key d \major \time 2/2 d1 | d1 | } I get the attached output. However, I thi

Re: Jianpu equal spacing

2017-06-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I am finally getting jianpu up and running. Thanks for all the > help. I found a snippet and made a scoresheet with jianpu and found > one problem. I will try to explain it as clearly as possible, but I > don't know the technical terms so I will also give an example. > [...] An image says mo

Re: Speedup with recent lilypond

2017-04-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> [...] but an "enormous speedup" would likely be a fix of the > defective Freetype font caching. Just to be clear: FreeType itself provides font caching within the library. However, lilypond doesn't use this functionality (and right so). You rather mean problems with the fontconfig library.

Re: How to select lyrics font?

2017-04-10 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> \layout { > \context { > \Lyrics > \override LyricText.font-name = #”Crimson Text" Minor glitch: The first doublequote character must be the ASCII one, too, so this line reads \override LyricText.font-name = #"Crimson Text" Note that we still don't have a proper interface to a

Re: Scaled grace

2017-03-21 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Cool. We should definitely discuss the proper set of options and > include that to LilyPond (or if that's for some reason not desired > to openLilyLib). Definitely! Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.

Re: What can Premusic do that others can't?

2017-03-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Werner, thanks for asking. I scored the second image you sent me. At > least, the parts of music exemplifying the complexity of > Chopin. Slurs and everything else have to be > discussed. http://pastebin.com/raw/APgfGgQz Here is the code, but > you will have to paste it into a text editor to dis

Re: What can Premusic do that others can't?

2017-03-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> As an example of what David is mentioning, have a look at the attached > png image (taken from Chopin's prelude op. 28/24) and try to notate > this. Oops, wrong image. Here's the right one. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gn

Re: Parallel Square Premusic

2017-03-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> I'm very certain that Parallel Squares will revolutionize the field >> of music notation. There simply has never been anything like it. > > But there have been statements like that for every discipline of > science and arts a billion times over. It's almost a telltale sign > where they lead

Re: Entering (lute) tablature

2017-03-19 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Re font-embedding, the attached uses the characters you suggested > above, Note that there is a fundamental problem with the transcription: It's not clear how long accidentals are valid. For such unmetered music it probably makes most sense to always write accidentals. A problematic place is

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-02-12 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> The attached is better structured and it supports 'shorten-pair for > the slurs. Very nice! Please submit this :-) Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: tuplet slurs

2017-02-11 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> For voices with lyrics it is common to put triplet indications >> always above the staff, using the following rules. >> >> . stems up or down, no beam: as usual (i.e., a number and a >> bracket at the top, as if using \tupletUp) >> >>. stems up, with beam: as usual (i.e., a number ov

long `instrument' names in frenched scores

2017-02-09 Thread Werner LEMBERG
In vocal scores it is common that singer parts that were omitted for some sytems are introduced again with its full name – not written in front of the system but at the beginning of the line. Do we have support for this feature already? Werner ___

tuplet slurs

2017-02-09 Thread Werner LEMBERG
For voices with lyrics it is common to put triplet indications always above the staff, using the following rules. . stems up or down, no beam: as usual (i.e., a number and a bracket at the top, as if using \tupletUp) . stems up, with beam: as usual (i.e., a number over the beam) The

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-09 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>> Just for the record: With Firefox on Linux there's *no* problem. >> >>Indeed, sigh. This is one of the reasons I don't like working with >>HTML. Hopefully Blended can be improved to completely hide such >>issues for Joe User. > > I assume this doesn't have anything to do with Blender (or th

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-09 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> . At the top, I get something like the attached image (using >> Chrome), regardless of the magnification. This looks bad. Isn't >> it possible to have the button size changed dynamically? > > Just for the record: With Firefox on Linux there's *no* problem. Indeed, sigh. This is one of

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-08 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Ok, you can see the most current version of my design on > http://jmroper.com/lilypond Thanks. First, some comments regarding the layout. . I like the sans-serif font more that you've used in the previous version. Please restore it. . At the top, I get something like the attached image (u

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-07 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> John, can you set up >> >> http://jmroper.com/lilypond/ >> >> with `blended' together with a README so that we can inspect the >> source code, CSS, etc., and the necessary steps to create it? I >> think only a direct comparison can answer our questions. > > Yes I can. I also have a Github r

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-06 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> OK, I was asking because I have written a static command line HTML >> site generator that builds from HTML, Markdown, reStruturedText, >> Textile, Plain Text (.txt), and Microsoft Word (.docx). >> >> http://jmroper.com/blended > > I am not convinced that that changing our HTML generation is in

Re: New LilyPond website

2017-02-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Ok, so what are the major things you would like from a new web > redesign (not including the docs)? > > I know of: > > Not reliant on JavaScript > Can be translated > Can be updated with each new build If possible, try an incremental approach! I'm quite sure that you can achieve almost every

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

2017-01-14 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> OK, thanks for working on this. However, it would be still >> valuable to know why module loading fails with a static version of >> guile. This might be either a bug or missing information in the >> documentation. > > It's a known problem ... there already is a related thread in > guile-user

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

2017-01-12 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> After a loser look at the sources and the build system I think it's > better (= much easier) to stay with shared libraries. OK, thanks for working on this. However, it would be still valuable to know why module loading fails with a static version of guile. This might be either a bug or missin

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

2017-01-11 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Hello Knut! > Using a guile 1.8.8 built with --disable-shared building of lilypond > fails early: Ouch. > Ok, let's look at srfi-1.scm line 221..223: > >;; Load the compiled primitives from the shared library. >;; >(load-extension "libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3" "scm_init_srfi_1") > > C

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

2017-01-07 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I can't speak for other distros, but at least as far as Debian is > concerned, if the upstream (i.e., lilypond) source tarball contains > a copy of the guile-1.8 sources, and the build script is tweaked > such that it installs a copy of guile 1.8 in paths private to > lilypond, e.g., /usr/lib/li

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

2017-01-07 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>> Where would I find suitable documentation or tutorials to do so >>> (doesn't have to be explicitly about Guile 1.8 vs. 2 of course)? >> >> It's rather simple. [...] > > To build lilypond we require guile-xx-dev (don't remember if we > require guile-xx-libs as well). Will the method described

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

2017-01-07 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> You probably know about > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2016-11/msg00031.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2016-12/msg00041.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2017-01/msg3.html > > Regarding all the bugreports I listed there (probably with

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

2017-01-07 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> ./configure --disable-error-on-warning --prefix=`pwd`/../gnu-packages Ah, using `pwd' here is a bad idea, sorry. You should rather use ./configure --disable-error-on-warning --prefix=$HOME/gnu-packages So here are the complete instructions again. cd $HOME mkdir gnu-packages wget ht

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

2017-01-07 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> If you get a failure, simply restart the `configure' script (with > all options) until it succeeds. Of course you have to fix the problem first that makes `configure' fail :-) Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://l

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

2017-01-07 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> Mhmm, compiling and installing guile 1.8 is not rocket science... > > Probably not, but ... > >> Have you tried that already? > > ... i am not familiar enough with all this packaging stuff to be > confident about installing alternative versions to system installed > packages ... You would i

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

2017-01-07 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Unfortunately I ran into this very issue, changing from Debian > stable (in the Linux Mint Debian Edition incarnation) to vanilla > Debian testing. I did this because the PyQt5 packages in stable are > too old to run current Frescobaldi from its Git repository. Now > that I managed to get Fresco

Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond

2016-12-28 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> OpenSuSE, I'd recommend to use the Tumbleweed variant. It's a good >> distribution, and a nice feature for developers is that it allows >> easy parallel installation of guile 1 and 2. > > Unfortunately, as always, there are trade-offs. I'm a SuSE guy > myself (back from SuSE 5.4 days iirc the

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-12-10 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> I just don't think I am the best person for the job. > > Roper has finally posted something I agree with. Why this unwarranted hostility? His final design was sound, and I think we should adapt some key elements. And even if you think it was not, you shouldn't word it like that. Werner

Re: How to build LilyPond.app on macOS?

2016-12-06 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Note I'm not saying it can't be done. OK, we agree :-) Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: How to build LilyPond.app on macOS?

2016-12-06 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> Can someone please provide me a hint about how to build >> LilyPond.app on macOS (natively, without any cross-compiling, >> ideally without compiling any dependencies like ghostscript etc.)? > > It is not meant to be compiled natively. This is not true. However, we rely heavily on the GNU st

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-12-01 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Regarding the font: While I find it acceptable for most of the text, > I’d prefer something different for titles, esp. the main title. You have to be more specific. I like the current font look of http://jmroper.com/lilypond because it is very uniform, not distracting from the contents. W

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I updated the font (again) and I think it works for everyone's > requests. I like it, thanks! Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>> I don't understand. Where is the point in recreating somthing >>> close to the old look? I thought the whole idea was to create >>> something new? He provides fine-tuning, e.g., responsive design suitable to different screen widths. I consider this quite valuable! > I updated the font with

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I added a small shadow to the boxes, and I fixed some coloring of > links. You may have to force-refresh the page to see the changes > (CTRL + F5) Ah, I wasn't aware of that command, thanks! Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> > You make the argument of readability, and I counter it with this: >> > https://www.google.com/amp/www.webdesignerdepot.com/2013/03/serif-vs-sans-the-final-battle/amp/?client=ms-android-google >> >> Perhaps a misunderstanding: The readability concern is the grey >> colour in combination with t

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> You make the argument of readability, and I counter it with this: > https://www.google.com/amp/www.webdesignerdepot.com/2013/03/serif-vs-sans-the-final-battle/amp/?client=ms-android-google Perhaps a misunderstanding: The readability concern is the grey colour in combination with too thin letter

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-30 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>> One of the major things on the site that make it look antiquated >>> is the LilyPond intro using the text that looks like it came from >>> a server error message. >> >> LOL > > Concise, readable, informative: must be an error. Hehe. It's very annoying to me that so many sites use extremely

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> jmroper.com/lilypond Nice! Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> As David K. pointed out, it must be viewable and navigatable by >> blind people. > > As I wrote, there are some aspects that need to be solved. I just > do not reject a potential valuable approach beforehand. Nobody does that. You are inferring this. >> Additionally, it must be possible to

Re: New LilyPond website

2016-11-29 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> Additionally there has been *very strict* opposition to anything >> other than statically served sites for lilypond.org in the past. >> Not all of the reasons are bullet-proof but most are, and you will >> not get consent for anything else. > > If the web site must be cast in stone, then welco

Re: Solution to 7 over sqr(71) time against integer polyrhythms

2016-11-15 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Nice try, but so obvious I already tried it long ago -- remove the > timing translator and default barline engraver from the Score > portion of the layout and insert it in the Staff portion. Nope. > Doesn't work with my score. As usual, please show us a minimum working example that exhibits th

Re: Can't get page breaks for 7 over square root of 71 meter

2016-11-03 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> A meter of 7/sqr(71) [...] > The problem comes from Lilypond's bizarre assumption that at some > point all the barlines in the score will line up. [...] > > That's a) insane, Mhmm. > b) stupid, Mhmm, mhmm. > c) unmusical, You are joking, aren't you? Show me *any* piece that uses this – e

Re: Changing voice order...

2016-11-03 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> So > \voiceOne \voiceTwo \voiceThree \voiceFour > becomes > \voiceUp \voiceDown \voiceUpTwo \voiceDownTwo I would make \voiceUp and \voiceDown be the same as \voiceUpOne and \voiceUpTwo, respectively, so that we can write \voiceUpOne \voiceDownOne \voiceUpTwo \voiceDownTwo Werner ___

Re: Changing voice order...

2016-11-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I was thrilled and excited by your proposal. Having had some > leisure time this afternoon (although without net-access) I played > around with it. I've taken it as a local command, though. > > The result is a wrapper around simultaneous music, with and without > "\\". You can input straight

Re: Changing voice order...

2016-11-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> \voiceOrder { 1, 3, 5, 7, 6, 4, 2 } >> << c'''2 \\ g'' \\ e'' \\ c'' \\ g' \\ e' \\ c' >> > > More like \voices 1,3,5,7,6,4,2 << ... >> if we want to keep in > current syntax. This is assuming a one-shot command taking the << > >> construct as its last argument. Hmm, my original idea was a

Re: Augmentation dots regtests

2016-11-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Looking at these, I suspect dot-columns on voices should be the > default. Perhaps that would increase the motivation to fix its > issues ;) Hehe, good argument :-) Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.

Re: Augmentation dots regtests

2016-11-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Does moving the dot-column-engraver to voice sort out the confusing > horizontal spacing in these situations? First time I've seen that > and it does interesting things to the positioning of dots. Alas, it doesn't work reliably in many cases (because it works locally only) and it sometimes pro

Re: Changing voice order...

2016-11-01 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> To make it more visible I coded a small snippet annotating some info > to NoteHeads in > << .. \\ .. \\ ... ... ... >>-constructs. > > Output attached. Thanks! What about a two-step process: You first set up the order of the voices, then you input from top to bottom. Example: % current <

Re: Augmentation dots regtests

2016-11-01 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> 1) The kievan dot for a notehead on a line moved to a space, when it >should have stayed on a line. > > 2) When notes are displayed without a staff, the dot should stay on >the same level as the notehead, but it shifts up a half space. > > I'd welcome a critical review of the regtests to

Re: Augmentation dots reg test

2016-10-29 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>What happens with your new code with overlapping, rather than >>stacked notes? E.g. << 4. // 2. >> (untested). >> >>I think from previous test cases it may become difficult to >>understand which dots behind to which notes. IIRC there's an >>outstanding bug about horizontal positioning in this si

Re: Augmentation dots reg test

2016-10-29 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I would like your opinion on whether the attached regression test, > which is different from the current development regression tests, is > correct. I think it is, but I'd like your opinions. Thanks, it looks fine. However, I second Chris's concerns regarding more complicated cases where you

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

2016-10-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Fortunately, it was much easier than I feared it might be. > > Here's a revised version. Now all examples look fine. Halleluja :-) Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-use

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

2016-10-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
[Note that currently the descriptions are sometimes incorrect in the tests.] > Anyway, I've run through all the tests, and I think that the default > algorithm works exactly according to the Powell algorithm, as I > understand it. Mhmm, 22b, and 24b are not correct IMHO: The lowest dot should b

Re: Changing voice order...

2016-10-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Werner, that does not even make sense. [...] Ok, I completely misunderstood you, sorry. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Changing voice order...

2016-10-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >> >> >>If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order: >> >>1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ... >> >>while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to >>bottom, assignments should be more like >> >>1/2, 3/1/2, 3/

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

2016-10-25 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Thanks, Carl! > At a quick glance, the only two situations that need dots-limit =2 > are #11 and #23. Seconded. I also think that #13 also looks better with value 2 – the nearer the number of dots to the number of noteheads, the better. What about #24/2? Why is the lowest dot below the a's l

Re: Dynamic text font

2016-10-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Some more comments. > When using customised fonts for dynamics, the following works just > fine: > > \override DynamicText.font-name = "Noto Serif Bold Italic" But the font name is *not* `Noto Serif Bold Italic'! The font name is `Noto Serif', and the style is `Bold Italic'. That `Noto Serif

Re: Dynamic text font

2016-10-01 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> It’s commercially licenced. I can’t, therefore. OK. First, I would like to see the fontconfig entry. Say fc-list -v > fc-list.log on the command line, search the entry for your font in the created log file and post it here. Then please get `ttx' from https://github.com/fonttools/fontt

Re: Dynamic text font

2016-10-01 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> But I have a new commercial Open Type font on the Linux system, > correctly installed as proven by being able to use it in other > applications: > > \override DynamicText.font-name = "Core Slab M 27 Cn ExtraLight Italic" > > but lilypond does not use it, despite reporting its existence using >

Re: v2.19.47 on Mac x86 (Jacques Menu Muzhic)

2016-09-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97546 >> >> The proposed fix hasn't been applied yet to the fontconfig git >> repository – maybe we should downgrade GUB's fontconfig version to >> 2.12.0 until this is fixed. > > I think that there is another possible solution. To use the > prop

Re: v2.19.47 on Mac x86 (Jacques Menu Muzhic)

2016-09-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Most likely cause of the issue will be the 2.12.1 change that > improved cache validation logic (and for yet unknown reasons always > invalidates the cache of the Mac OS System fonts) > > https://www.freedesktop.org/software/fontconfig/release/ChangeLog-2.12.1 Aah, this rings a bell. https:/

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >