This smells like a bug to me:
\version 2.18.2
\language english
\relative c' {
\cadenzaOn
a4 b cs d% accidental is printed
\cadenzaOff
\bar || % \time 4/4
e d cs b% accidental is NOT printed -- huh??
a b cs d% accidental is printed
}
I'm aware that \cadenzaOn will remember
On 14/06/14 10:20, James Harkins wrote:
This smells like a bug to me:
\version 2.18.2
\language english
\relative c' {
\cadenzaOn
a4 b cs d% accidental is printed
\cadenzaOff
\bar || % \time 4/4
e d cs b% accidental is NOT printed -- huh??
a b cs d% accidental is
I'm re-framing my query regarding accidental behavior following
\cadenzaOff. After some discussion about this on bug- it is quite clear
that '\cadenzaOff' *only* affects counting/timing and '\bar' *only*
paints a graphic of a bar line. Currently, if an accidental appears in
the cadenza it
In my mind, the real bug is that \cadenzaOff does not seem to turn the
cadenza off immediately, but rather one measure later. I'm not sure
why it behaves as it does.
In any case, I always turn the cadenza off a full measure before I
actually want it turned off.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:48 AM,
Neil Thornock neilthorn...@gmail.com writes:
In my mind, the real bug is that \cadenzaOff does not seem to turn the
cadenza off immediately, but rather one measure later. I'm not sure
why it behaves as it does.
It resets timing to normal, and normal does not mean the end of a
measure.
--
Hello,
On 5 March 2012 15:20, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Neil Thornock neilthorn...@gmail.com writes:
In my mind, the real bug is that \cadenzaOff does not seem to turn the
cadenza off immediately, but rather one measure later. I'm not sure
why it behaves as it does.
It resets
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
On 5 March 2012 15:20, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Neil Thornock neilthorn...@gmail.com writes:
In my mind, the real bug is that \cadenzaOff does not seem to turn the
cadenza off immediately, but rather one measure later. I'm not sure
why it
Normal from what perspective? Where it left off before \cadenzaOn or
simply that it starts back at '0' immediately \cadenzaOff
I'm wondering if we need something (a sentence of two) in the NR to
avoid what is obviously something that does confuse people.
I still have not figured out the
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 03:23:08PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
David Bobroff bobr...@centrum.is wrote in message
news:4f547dc7.10...@centrum.is...
I'm re-framing my query regarding accidental behavior following
\cadenzaOff. After some discussion about this on bug- it is quite
clear that
Neil Thornock neilthorn...@gmail.com writes:
Normal from what perspective? Where it left off before \cadenzaOn or
simply that it starts back at '0' immediately \cadenzaOff
I'm wondering if we need something (a sentence of two) in the NR to
avoid what is obviously something that does confuse
10 matches
Mail list logo
