Hi all,
> "will include the following as one of many constituents
> upon instantiation to be part of its translator group"
\involves
\incorporates
??
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
___
Hi David,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 6:37 PM David Kastrup wrote:
>
> "consists of" and "will include the following as one of many
> constituents upon instantiation to be part of its translator group" is
> not the same.
>
> Well, if the latter of these is what "\consists" is intended to mean in
this
On 2018-06-15 09:03, David Kastrup wrote:
"consists of" and "will include the following as one of many
constituents upon instantiation to be part of its translator group" is
not the same.
I asked you to defend the hyperbolic "factually utterly wrong". At most
the distinctions are that of tens
>> \enbike \debike
> You mean \mount \unmount ?
No… \addbiketoshed \removebikefromshed
=)
K.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
___
lilypond-user mailing
Kieren MacMillan writes:
>>> Another alternative might be \including and \excluding
>> Or \engages / \disengages . So many bike sheds.
>
> \enbike \debike
You mean \mount \unmount ?
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.
Aaron Hill writes:
> On 2018-06-14 23:58, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
>>> Here is a usage of the \consists command:
>>>
>>> \context {
>>> \Staff
>>> \consists Mark_engraver
>>> \consists Metronome_mark_engraver
>>> }
>>>
>>> To convey what this does,
: Re: \consists terminology
>> Another alternative might be \including and \excluding
> Or \engages / \disengages . So many bike sheds.
\enbike \debike
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmi
>> Another alternative might be \including and \excluding
> Or \engages / \disengages . So many bike sheds.
\enbike \debike
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
__
On 2018-06-14 23:58, David Kastrup wrote:
Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
Here is a usage of the \consists command:
\context {
\Staff
\consists Mark_engraver
\consists Metronome_mark_engraver
}
To convey what this does, it would be more along the lines of
"Create a Staff cont
How about \contains and \excludes?
\contains says that we want a context to contain a particular kind of translator
\excludes says that we want exclude a translator that would normally be
included
\includes and \excludes would be more a natural pair, but then there is a
conflict between \incl
Carl Sorensen writes:
> How about \contains and \excludes?
>
> \contains says that we want a context to contain a particular kind of
> translator
> \excludes says that we want exclude a translator that would normally be
> included
>
> \includes and \excludes would be more a natural pair, but
Aaron Hill writes:
> On 2018-06-15 03:29, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 1:42 AM David Kastrup wrote:
Sorry, this is not going at all in the direction you were aiming for
but from a purely technical standpoint getting rid of \remove
On 2018-06-15 03:29, David Kastrup wrote:
Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 1:42 AM David Kastrup wrote:
Sorry, this is not going at all in the direction you were aiming for
but from a purely technical standpoint getting rid of \remove would
be a much more worthwhile targ
Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 1:42 AM David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> David Kastrup writes:
>>
>> > Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
>> >
>> >> I think that conveys more clearly what is happening.
>> >
>> > Not really: that remains something to look up in the documentation
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 1:42 AM David Kastrup wrote:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
> > Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
> >
> >> I think that conveys more clearly what is happening.
> >
> > Not really: that remains something to look up in the documentation.
> >
> > Now I'll readily admit that \consis
David Kastrup writes:
> Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
>
>> I think that conveys more clearly what is happening.
>
> Not really: that remains something to look up in the documentation.
>
> Now I'll readily admit that \consists / \remove does not make for an
> appealing antonym pair. I'd be le
[Adding a distinction in the thread title]
Am 15. Juni 2018 09:44:44 MESZ schrieb "N. Andrew Walsh"
:
>Pedantry Corner: the *active* verb that Elaine is seeking is actually
>"comprise." As in, "the committee comprises representatives from
>various
>disciplines." The verb in the opposite direction
17 matches
Mail list logo
