Thanks; I think you are right about it being convoluted, and I will just
continue using explicit \tweak and \override statements.
Cheers,
-Ahanu
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 4:18 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
> Le 30/06/2022 à 22:04, Ahanu Banerjee a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is it possible to
Ahanu Banerjee writes:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to override or tweak multiple properties of one object at
> once, using one statement? i.e., without typing "\tweak" or "\override"
> multiple times? (Of course, defining a new function consisting of multiple
> statements is possible, but it's
Le 30/06/2022 à 22:04, Ahanu Banerjee a écrit :
Hello,
Is it possible to override or tweak multiple properties of one object
at once, using one statement? i.e., without typing "\tweak" or
"\override" multiple times? (Of course, defining a new function
consisting of multiple statements is
Hello,
Is it possible to override or tweak multiple properties of one object at
once, using one statement? i.e., without typing "\tweak" or "\override"
multiple times? (Of course, defining a new function consisting of multiple
statements is possible, but it's not practical when there are many
Aaron Hill writes:
> On 2020-02-02 2:26 am, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Aaron Hill writes:
>>
>>> Music functions certainly give you the most flexibility, although
>>> there are simple cases where you can use 2.19's \etc keyword as a
>>> shorthand to defining the function yourself:
>>>
>>>
On 2020-02-02 2:26 am, David Kastrup wrote:
Aaron Hill writes:
Music functions certainly give you the most flexibility, although
there are simple cases where you can use 2.19's \etc keyword as a
shorthand to defining the function yourself:
\version "2.19"
stemColor = \override
Aaron Hill writes:
> Music functions certainly give you the most flexibility, although
> there are simple cases where you can use 2.19's \etc keyword as a
> shorthand to defining the function yourself:
>
>
> \version "2.19"
>
> stemColor = \override Stem.color = \etc
>
> { d'8 \stemColor
On 2020-02-01 6:46 pm, Bric wrote:
In my case i am needing to override a series of notes and then revert.
(So, don't want to use "\once"). I have already used your construct,
coupling it with reverting directives grouped the same way (with a
named group):
emphasizeStem = {
\override
> On February 1, 2020 at 7:06 PM Aaron Hill wrote:
> related \overrides into their own music variable or function, if there
> needs to be some parameterization:
>
>
> \version "2.18"
>
> emphasizeStem = {
>\override Stem.thickness = #3.0
>\override Stem.color = #'(0.5 0.3 0.2)
On 2020-02-01 7:54 am, David Kastrup wrote:
Bric writes:
Is it possible to override multiple with just one "\override"
directive?
something like this (wrong syntax):
\override { Voice.Stem.thickness = #3.0
Voice.Stem.color = #(rgb-color 0.3 0.1 0.1)
}
to reduce
Bric writes:
> The documentation examples are showing single property overrides, like so:
>
> \override Voice.Stem.thickness = #3.0
>
> Is it possible to override multiple with just one "\override" directive?
>
> something like this (wrong syntax):
>
> \override { Voice.Stem.thickness = #3.0
>
The documentation examples are showing single property overrides, like so:
\override Voice.Stem.thickness = #3.0
Is it possible to override multiple with just one "\override" directive?
something like this (wrong syntax):
\override { Voice.Stem.thickness = #3.0
Voice.Stem.color =
12 matches
Mail list logo
