RE: 2.15.8 8/8 autobeam 3 3 2 ??

2011-08-07 Thread James Lowe
Subject: Re: 2.15.8 8/8 autobeam 3 3 2 ?? On 7 August 2011 01:45, Paul Scott waterho...@ultrasw.com wrote: Hi, Is there a reason for this default beaming? I get (3 3 2) with 2.15.8. \version 2.15.8 { \time 8/8 \repeat unfold 16 a'8 } This is indeed the default setting as expressed

Re: 2.15.8 8/8 autobeam 3 3 2 ??

2011-08-07 Thread Paul Scott
Scott Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; Carl Sorensen Subject: Re: 2.15.8 8/8 autobeam 3 3 2 ?? On 7 August 2011 01:45, Paul Scottwaterho...@ultrasw.com wrote: Hi, Is there a reason for this default beaming? I get (3 3 2) with 2.15.8. \version 2.15.8 { \time 8/8 \repeat unfold 16 a'8

Re: 2.15.8 8/8 autobeam 3 3 2 ??

2011-08-07 Thread David Kastrup
...@gmail.com] Sent: 07 August 2011 03:24 To: Paul Scott Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; Carl Sorensen Subject: Re: 2.15.8 8/8 autobeam 3 3 2 ?? On 7 August 2011 01:45, Paul Scottwaterho...@ultrasw.com wrote: Hi, Is there a reason for this default beaming? I get (3 3 2) with 2.15.8. \version 2.15.8

Re: 2.15.8 8/8 autobeam 3 3 2 ??

2011-08-07 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: Paul Scott waterho...@ultrasw.com Can you give me some examples of music that is (3 3 2)? Elaine Gould (page 155) gives 332 as the first option for beaming 8/8. She adds or any other combination. That said, Gardener Read gives 2 as the standard

2.15.8 8/8 autobeam 3 3 2 ??

2011-08-06 Thread Paul Scott
Hi, Is there a reason for this default beaming? I get (3 3 2) with 2.15.8. \version 2.15.8 { \time 8/8 \repeat unfold 16 a'8 } TIA, Paul ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: 2.15.8 8/8 autobeam 3 3 2 ??

2011-08-06 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 7 August 2011 01:45, Paul Scott waterho...@ultrasw.com wrote: Hi, Is there a reason for this default beaming? I get (3 3 2) with 2.15.8. \version 2.15.8 { \time 8/8 \repeat unfold 16 a'8 } This is indeed the default setting as expressed in 'scm/time-signature-settings.scm'. What did