On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, Paolo Prete wrote:
Here's the fixed version:
waiting for feedbacks!
(Again and again: I write these snippets really in a hurry, in these days. A more
"structured" collaboration is getting necessary for me, at this point)
Put it in a little Github project?
--
MT
Hi David,
I probably have messed something up in the editor coding style. Currently
I'm using at least three different editors ad the same time.
I know it's weird and bad, but don't have time to switch to a proper env.
In Christmas days things are even more difficult...
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at
Here's the fixed version:
waiting for feedbacks!
(Again and again: I write these snippets really in a hurry, in these days.
A more "structured" collaboration is getting necessary for me, at this
point)
Any Javascript volunteer?
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 1:24 AM Paolo Prete wrote:
> I'm just
On Mon 16 Dec 2019 at 23:55:52 (+0100), Paolo Prete wrote:
> P.S) I don't know why the browser's viewer messes up the indentation of
> these attachments.
> If so, I ask if are there volunteers to fix that and re-post the snippet (I
> see correct indentation if I paste the code to any online js
I'm just noting that there's a bug with more than one Beam. I'm fixing it.
Have a bit of patience please ;-)
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:55 PM Paolo Prete wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> here is another snippet that uses the system that I previously
> implemented. This time for the tuning of the
On 12/16, Paolo Prete wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> here is another snippet that uses the system that I previously
> implemented. This time for the tuning of the beams. This is too a
> very tedious operation to do with just the code and for this I believe
> that this tool is also useful. As
Hello everybody,
here is another snippet that uses the system that I previously implemented.
This time for the tuning of the beams.
This is too a very tedious operation to do with just the code and for this
I believe that this tool is also useful.
As you can see, the code is not only shorter than
