I have added a snippet that sets the beam grouping automatically.
Needs loads of cleanup, but works.
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1id=395
-Rune
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On 29 Feb 2008, at 14:53, Rune Zedeler wrote:
I have added a snippet that sets the beam grouping automatically.
Needs loads of cleanup, but works.
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1id=395
Two possible extensions:
One might want (if called for) to have subbeaming, as in the what
gets
Kurt Kroon wrote:
(I'm not sure if one can extend this last one in LilyPond to more complex
examples, like when the numerator is an additive expression, and the
denominator is a single digit, e.g. (3+2+3)/8.)
I was mistaken ... it *is* possible to extend the syntax (which seems
2008/2/28 Kurt Kroon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was mistaken ... it *is* possible to extend the syntax (which seems
completely reasonable, in retrospect). I've borrowed (and stretched) the
compound-time-signature snippet as follows:
Yes, everything is possible :)
It isn't quite right -- the
2008/2/28 Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Try:
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 8 8 8) 3 8)
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 8 8 8) 5 8)
\set Staff.beatGrouping = #'(3 2 3)
LOL -- I hadn't seen your answer, Mats, sorry.
On the other hand, don't hesitate in general to add
Kurt Kroon wrote:
(I'm not sure if one can extend this last one in LilyPond to more complex
examples, like when the numerator is an additive expression, and the
denominator is a single digit, e.g. (3+2+3)/8.)
I was mistaken ... it *is* possible to extend the syntax (which seems
completely
Search for time signature note in the mailing list archives, and you will
find, for example
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-04/msg00123.html
/Mats
Joseph Wakeling wrote:
Kurt Kroon wrote:
(I'm not sure if one can extend this last one in LilyPond to more complex
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Search for time signature note in the mailing list archives, and you will
find, for example
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-04/msg00123.html
That's cool. I was wondering more if it was possible for that to be a
generally-set preference, along the
On 28 Feb 2008, at 17:32, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
I was wondering more if it was possible for that to be a
generally-set preference, along the lines of \set Staff.timeSignature
#'style = note (that's pseudo code, obviously:-), and also how
complex
the resulting note could be: for example,
Hans Aberg wrote:
On 28 Feb 2008, at 17:32, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
I was wondering more if it was possible for that to be a
generally-set preference, along the lines of \set Staff.timeSignature
#'style = note (that's pseudo code, obviously:-), and also how complex
the resulting note could
On 28 Feb 2008, at 23:23, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
I was wondering more if it was possible for that to be a
generally-set preference, along the lines of \set
Staff.timeSignature
#'style = note (that's pseudo code, obviously:-), and also how
complex
the resulting note could be: for example,
On 2008/02/28 1:30 AM, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kurt Kroon wrote:
\version 2.10.33
#(define (compound-time grob one two three num)
(interpret-markup
(ly:grob-layout grob)
'(((baseline-skip . 2)
(word-space . 2)
(font-family . number)))
(markup
(I'm not sure if one can extend this last one in LilyPond to more complex
examples, like when the numerator is an additive expression, and the
denominator is a single digit, e.g. (3+2+3)/8.)
I was mistaken ... it *is* possible to extend the syntax (which seems
completely reasonable, in
13 matches
Mail list logo
