I was so excited by \set Score.midiPanPosition that I was inspired to
write a function in Scheme that spreads the voices evenly from left to
right. It can’t look ahead to find the number of voices or staves,
that needs to be specified at the start or before a new \score
definition:
\version
Hi Vaughan,
if global is a music-function calling autopan, it will evaluate it
everytime. If global is a variable, its value is set, once it is assigned.
So if you have to wrap it in music-function. If you always have a
variable global containing all you need, you can wrap that in a function:
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de writes:
Hi Vaughan,
if global is a music-function calling autopan, it will evaluate it
everytime. If global is a variable, its value is set, once it is assigned.
So if you have to wrap it in music-function. If you always have a
variable global containing all
this into an \applyContext call. That way, you
get a call for each use in a different context.
\version 2.18.0
%%%
%{
Auto panner
Spreads voices evenly from -1 (LEFT) to 1 (RIGHT)
Usage:
\include
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de writes:
Thanks, David.
@Vaughan
For a short test ... this compiles, but I can't listen to the resulting
pan in midi
\version 2.18.0
%%%
%{
Auto panner
Spreads voices
On 27.01.2014 16:54, David Kastrup wrote:
autopan =
#(define-scheme-function (parser location)()
Why define-scheme-function when returning music?
Perhaps this function had another meaning in the first place?
I overlooked this, when injecting my ApplyContext lines.
(begin
(set!
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de writes:
On 27.01.2014 16:54, David Kastrup wrote:
autopan =
#(define-scheme-function (parser location)()
Why define-scheme-function when returning music?
Perhaps this function had another meaning in the first place?
I overlooked this, when injecting my
On 27.01.2014 20:51, David Kastrup wrote:
What about a closure?
Won't be able to distinguish being called another time from the same
output (\layout, \midi, \musicxml (this one's hypothetical yet),
\addQuote...) or the next one.
of course not ... I see Vaughans idea as a first draft ... and
On 28 January 2014 07:07, Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de wrote:
On 27.01.2014 20:51, David Kastrup wrote:
What about a closure?
Won't be able to distinguish being called another time from the same
output (\layout, \midi, \musicxml (this one's hypothetical yet),
\addQuote...) or the next
