Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-11 Thread Helge Kruse
Am 10.04.2012 08:37, schrieb Janek Warchoł: On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Helge Krusehelge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net wrote: What is the benefit of the two voices approach and when should I avoid the stem up/down? It's not a matter of benefits - using stemUp/Down instead of voiceOne/Two/..

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-11 Thread James
Hello, 2012/4/11 Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net: Am 10.04.2012 08:37, schrieb Janek Warchoł: On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Helge Krusehelge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net ... Honestly, I used the 2.13 documentation. Now I downloaded the 2.14 documentation. Searching for

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-11 Thread Helge Kruse
Am 11.04.2012 09:36, schrieb James: 2012/4/11 Helge Krusehelge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net: Honestly, I used the 2.13 documentation. Now I downloaded the 2.14 documentation. Searching for stemDown\Up\Neutral I didn't find any hint to favor voiceOne/Two/Three. But I did not read thorough 763 pages.

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-11 Thread James
Hello, On 11 April 2012 17:53, Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net wrote: Am 11.04.2012 09:36, schrieb James: 2012/4/11 Helge Krusehelge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net: Honestly, I used the 2.13 documentation. Now I downloaded the 2.14 documentation. Searching for stemDown\Up\Neutral I didn't find

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-11 Thread James
Hello, On 11 April 2012 17:53, Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net wrote: Am 11.04.2012 09:36, schrieb James: 2012/4/11 Helge Krusehelge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net: Honestly, I used the 2.13 documentation. Now I downloaded the 2.14 documentation. Searching for stemDown\Up\Neutral I didn't find

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-11 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net wrote: Am 10.04.2012 08:37, schrieb Janek Warchoł: On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Helge Krusehelge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net  wrote: It's not a matter of benefits - using stemUp/Down instead of voiceOne/Two/.. simply

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-11 Thread James
Helge, On 11 April 2012 13:02, Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net wrote: Am 11.04.2012 19:24, schrieb James: Well it requires that any changes I do in the English document are picked up and translated by the trasnaltors. The assumption is that those that do the German Translating see my

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-10 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net wrote: What is the benefit of the two voices approach and when should I avoid the stem up/down? It's not a matter of benefits - using stemUp/Down instead of voiceOne/Two/.. simply produces typographically wrong results:

Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-09 Thread Helge Kruse
Hello, I have some measures with similar rhythmic pattern but different pitch. But all look similar like this: \context PianoStaff \context Staff=right \relative c'' { \key g \major \time 3/4 s2. \stemUp d4~ d16 a' g\prall fis e\prall d cis\prall b | % 33 } \context Staff=left

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-09 Thread Thomas Morley
Am 9. April 2012 20:53 schrieb Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net: Hello, I have some measures with similar rhythmic pattern but different pitch. But all look similar like this: \context PianoStaff  \context Staff=right \relative c'' {    \key g \major \time 3/4 s2. \stemUp    d4~

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-09 Thread Helge Kruse
Am 09.04.2012 21:12, schrieb Thomas Morley: I'd use \override Script #'staff-padding = #'() and \voiceOne, \voiceTwo and \oneVoice: This looks great. I also played around with an approach that doesn't use the two voices since it's just the left hand that plays some part of the voice.