Am 10.04.2012 08:37, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Helge Krusehelge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net wrote:
What is the benefit of the two voices approach and when should I avoid the
stem up/down?
It's not a matter of benefits - using stemUp/Down instead of
voiceOne/Two/..
Hello,
2012/4/11 Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net:
Am 10.04.2012 08:37, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Helge Krusehelge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net
...
Honestly, I used the 2.13 documentation. Now I downloaded the 2.14
documentation. Searching for
Am 11.04.2012 09:36, schrieb James:
2012/4/11 Helge Krusehelge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net:
Honestly, I used the 2.13 documentation. Now I downloaded the 2.14
documentation. Searching for stemDown\Up\Neutral I didn't find any hint to
favor voiceOne/Two/Three. But I did not read thorough 763 pages.
Hello,
On 11 April 2012 17:53, Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 11.04.2012 09:36, schrieb James:
2012/4/11 Helge Krusehelge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net:
Honestly, I used the 2.13 documentation. Now I downloaded the 2.14
documentation. Searching for stemDown\Up\Neutral I didn't find
Hello,
On 11 April 2012 17:53, Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 11.04.2012 09:36, schrieb James:
2012/4/11 Helge Krusehelge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net:
Honestly, I used the 2.13 documentation. Now I downloaded the 2.14
documentation. Searching for stemDown\Up\Neutral I didn't find
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 10.04.2012 08:37, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Helge Krusehelge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net
wrote:
It's not a matter of benefits - using stemUp/Down instead of
voiceOne/Two/.. simply
Helge,
On 11 April 2012 13:02, Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 11.04.2012 19:24, schrieb James:
Well it requires that any changes I do in the English document are
picked up and translated by the trasnaltors. The assumption is that
those that do the German Translating see my
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net wrote:
What is the benefit of the two voices approach and when should I avoid the
stem up/down?
It's not a matter of benefits - using stemUp/Down instead of
voiceOne/Two/.. simply produces typographically wrong results:
Hello,
I have some measures with similar rhythmic pattern but different pitch.
But all look similar like this:
\context PianoStaff
\context Staff=right \relative c'' {
\key g \major \time 3/4 s2. \stemUp
d4~ d16 a' g\prall fis e\prall d cis\prall b | % 33
}
\context Staff=left
Am 9. April 2012 20:53 schrieb Helge Kruse helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net:
Hello,
I have some measures with similar rhythmic pattern but different pitch. But
all look similar like this:
\context PianoStaff
\context Staff=right \relative c'' {
\key g \major \time 3/4 s2. \stemUp
d4~
Am 09.04.2012 21:12, schrieb Thomas Morley:
I'd use \override Script #'staff-padding = #'() and \voiceOne,
\voiceTwo and \oneVoice:
This looks great. I also played around with an approach that doesn't use
the two voices since it's just the left hand that plays some part of the
voice.
11 matches
Mail list logo