Aw: Re: Re: Pseudo-handwritten font

2013-03-14 Thread Torsten Hämmerle
Hi Werner, What do you mean with rigid? Some things related to Feta/Emmentaler access are still being handled deep inside non-public scheme coding or even C source code and consequently very hard to tweak.Amongst the most stubborn stencils are multi measure rests where the glyph names are

Re: Aw: Re: Re: Pseudo-handwritten font

2013-03-14 Thread David Kastrup
Torsten Hämmerle torsten.haemme...@web.de writes: I'm just happy that in the meantime some main actors as David or even Jan seem to acknowledge the fact that Lilypond would certainly benefit from being able to produce jazz output. It's not just Jazz. This is pretty much par for the course

Aw: Re: Re: Pseudo-handwritten font

2013-03-14 Thread Torsten Hämmerle
Gesendet:Donnerstag, 14. Mrz 2013 um 11:53 Uhr Von:David Kastrup d...@gnu.org I think what we want to arrive at is a way to drop in music fonts into LilyPond in a tolerable workable way. I think that we cant avoid at first the necessity of having the font, if not its glyphs, at least

Re: Aw: Re: Re: Pseudo-handwritten font

2013-03-14 Thread Werner LEMBERG
[please use plain text for your e-mails] What do you mean with `rigid'? Some things related to Feta/Emmentaler access are still being handled deep inside non-public scheme coding or even C source code and consequently very hard to tweak. Please open bug reports about those issues. The

Re: Aw: Re: Re: Pseudo-handwritten font

2013-03-14 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:59 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Torsten Hämmerle torsten.haemme...@web.de writes: I'm just happy that in the meantime some main actors as David or even Jan seem to acknowledge the fact that Lilypond would certainly benefit from being able to produce jazz