Re: Beaming problem introduced with 2.13.60

2011-04-20 Thread flup2
I had the same problem in a score with these notes : d4-- c8-( g ~ g) g'-( f e) I had no problem before 2.13.60 Philippe -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Beaming-problem-introduced-with-2.13.60-tp31416244p31439163.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list

Re: Beaming problem introduced with 2.13.60

2011-04-20 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:01 AM, flup2 wrote: I had the same problem in a score with these notes : d4-- c8-( g ~ g) g'-( f e) I had no problem before 2.13.60 Philippe Your snippet compiles fine in the most recent development version. Cheers, MS

Re: Beaming problem introduced with 2.13.60

2011-04-20 Thread flup2
bounds etc.). http://old.nabble.com/file/p31440777/stem.jpg No problem with these measures alone, but in a whole score, the problem occurs Philippe -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Beaming-problem-introduced-with-2.13.60-tp31416244p31440777.html Sent from the Gnu

Re: Beaming problem introduced with 2.13.60

2011-04-20 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: flup2 phili...@philmassart.net To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 1:24 PM Subject: Re: Beaming problem introduced with 2.13.60 So do it here when running only that line. The problem is that, in a longer file (without changes from

Re: Beaming problem introduced with 2.13.60

2011-04-17 Thread Nick Payne
The problem still exists with the \stemUp and \stemDown commands and the first bar removed: \version 2.13.60 \language english \relative c' { \time 3/4 cs16 a'' a fs fs ef ef c c a fs( d) | } attachment: test.preview.png___ lilypond-user

Beaming problem introduced with 2.13.60

2011-04-16 Thread Nick Payne
Example below demonstrates (a couple of bars taken from Bach's chaconne). This problem did not exist in versions prior to 2.13.60: %= \version 2.13.60 \language english \relative c' { \time 3/4 \key d \minor \stemUp d,16 bf''' bf gs gs f f d d b gs e