Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

> Am I right that you want a solution that prints exactly one beam less > than the neighboring stem with the least beams. Yes, since this looks quite natural to me (well, as far as something in your constructed example can look natural at all). Werner

Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

Am 15.01.2016 um 08:49 schrieb Urs Liska: >> > Actually, I'm missing a solution that looks like F) but has three >> > beams between 2 and 3. > I've been thinking about that too. This would somehow be like a "partial > subdivision" where the beam count is not governed by the > rhythmic_importance

Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

Am 13.01.2016 um 20:07 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: > The second is simply the easiest to read. > HTH > Pierre > > 2016-01-13 18:59 GMT+01:00 Kieren MacMillan > >: > > Hi Urs, > > > which of the attached engravings

Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

Hi Urs, > Take the attached example "undivided". Of course the second line is easier to > read and therefore preferable Yes. > So I suggest the following: > • Default behaviour is (as currently): point the extra beam to the side > with more stems (i.e. join them) > •

Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

Am 14.01.2016 um 12:33 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: >> So I suggest the following: >> >• Default behaviour is (as currently): point the extra beam to the side >> > with more stems (i.e. join them) >> >• strictBeatBeaming produces (as currently) the extra stemlet but (new) >> > joins the

Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

On 15.01.2016 01:09, Urs Liska wrote: F) is interesting as it*only* has strictBeatBeaming set. There is no subdivision in the middle of the beam (7-8) because subdivideBeams is not set. However, the beamlets at stems 2 and 10 force the subdivisions 2-3 and 9-10, each resulting in the beam count

Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

> I have pulled together a complicated example, which is engraved with > a number of option combinations. For ease of discussion I have > numbered the stems. Thanks. My comments below are of general nature, not specific to subdivisions. > B) and C) are with just subdivideBeams on, but with

Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

Am 15.01.2016 um 01:19 schrieb Simon Albrecht: > On 15.01.2016 01:09, Urs Liska wrote: >> F) is interesting as it*only* has strictBeatBeaming set. >> There is no subdivision in the middle of the beam (7-8) because >> subdivideBeams is not set. However, the beamlets at stems 2 and 10 force >>

Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

Am 15.01.2016 um 06:52 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: >> I have pulled together a complicated example, which is engraved with >> a number of option combinations. For ease of discussion I have >> numbered the stems. > Thanks. My comments below are of general nature, not specific to > subdivisions.

Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

Am 15.01.2016 um 08:49 schrieb Urs Liska: >> In solution G), I think that position 2 is really invalid. How can it >> > have a duration of 1/32 and 1/64 at the same time? > That's true. > I'll have to look into that (obviously the stem is also looking to the > right side and takes more beams

Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

The second is simply the easiest to read. HTH Pierre 2016-01-13 18:59 GMT+01:00 Kieren MacMillan : > Hi Urs, > > > which of the attached engravings do you prefer, LilyPond's current or > the modified? > > The second. > And Gould agrees. =) > > Hope this helps! >

Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

Hi all, one more beaming question, given the following input \relative a' { \time 6/8 \set strictBeatBeaming = ##t a8.. a32 a16 a } which of the attached engravings do you prefer, LilyPond's current or the modified? Would it make sense to add a beaming option (e.g.

Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

Am 13.01.2016 um 18:09 schrieb Urs Liska: > Hi all, > > one more beaming question, > > given the following input > > \relative a' { > \time 6/8 > \set strictBeatBeaming = ##t > a8.. a32 a16 a > } > > which of the attached engravings do you prefer, LilyPond's current or > the modified? >

Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

Am 13.01.2016 um 18:23 schrieb Urs Liska: > > > Am 13.01.2016 um 18:09 schrieb Urs Liska: >> Hi all, >> >> one more beaming question, >> >> given the following input >> >> \relative a' { >> \time 6/8 >> \set strictBeatBeaming = ##t >> a8.. a32 a16 a >> } >> >> which of the attached

Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

> given the following input > > \relative a' { > \time 6/8 > \set strictBeatBeaming = ##t > a8.. a32 a16 a > } > > which of the attached engravings do you prefer, LilyPond's current or > the modified? [Both images are called `document.png', which is not optimal :-)] I prefer the second

Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming

Hi Urs, > which of the attached engravings do you prefer, LilyPond's current or the > modified? The second. And Gould agrees. =) Hope this helps! Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info