On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:45:46PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Cameron Horsburgh escreveu:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:09:39PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
don't; -dlog-file=foo is the recommended method. -dseparate-log-files if
you need multiple logs.
I might have this wrong,
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
lilypond -dlog-file=log foo.ly
lilypond -dseparate-log-files foo.ly bar.ly
and no log files.
Thoughts?
They all work on 2.11.18. Evidently something changed between 2.10 and
2.11.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
Cameron Horsburgh escreveu:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 03:13:36PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 11:40:45AM -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
I'd love to be able to specify a log file for either each file or the
entire run.
Hi folks,
I'm trying to batch process a whole lot (150+) of ly files. I'm able
to process them, but a lot of them are producing errors that I'd like
to be able to catch in some organised way. I've tried simply directing
stdout to a file, but that doesn't seem to work (I'm running Debian
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
I'd love to be able to specify a log file for either each file or the
entire run. Does this exist? If not, does anyone have any idea how I
might be able to do this?
for f in *.ly ; do lilypond $f $f.log ; done;
Something like that, at least.
Cheers,
- Graham
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 11:40:45AM -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
I'd love to be able to specify a log file for either each file or the
entire run. Does this exist? If not, does anyone have any idea how I
might be able to do this?
for f in *.ly
