Am 11.05.2017 um 01:03 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
>
> Change clefs can be recognised by the glyph name as well. You can try
> putting some sort of (display glyph-name) in the body of the
> let-expression (on the same level like the actual functionality) to find
> out more.
Ah of course. Thanks,
Am 10.05.2017 um 19:26 schrieb Noeck:
Am 10.05.2017 um 00:03 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
of course you could write a callback:
Thanks Simon,
that's much better than my approach to replace the \clef command with a
\once \override or \tweak and \clef combination.
I'll figure out what the #\F means
Am 10.05.2017 um 00:03 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> of course you could write a callback:
Thanks Simon,
that's much better than my approach to replace the \clef command with a
\once \override or \tweak and \clef combination.
I'll figure out what the #\F means but could someone tell me how I can
yeah. Sorry about that. I was going off of memory, but forgot that this
is how the pairs are actually utilized. Thanks, Simon, for a usable
solution.
Best,
Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ClefModifier-tweaks-conditional-on-clef-tp203018p203039.html
Am 09.05.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Joram,
does it only handle the x-offset? Try-and-error told me that the first
number is the X-offset for _8 and the second for ^8.
But can I affect the y position?
Ah! I look forward to seeing the answer.
It would be great (actually, kind of
Hi Joram,
> does it only handle the x-offset? Try-and-error told me that the first
> number is the X-offset for _8 and the second for ^8.
> But can I affect the y position?
Ah! I look forward to seeing the answer.
It would be great (actually, kind of essential) if it did.
Thanks,
Kieren.
Hi,
does it only handle the x-offset? Try-and-error told me that the first
number is the X-offset for _8 and the second for ^8.
But can I affect the y position?
Best,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Abraham,
> The ClefModifier grob has a property called "clef-alignments" that handles
> this, providing individual positioning for G, F, and C clefs (you'll likely
> need to play around with the numbers a bit):
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/internals/clefmodifier
Oh, FFS… I
ot;clef-alignments" that handles
this, providing individual positioning for G, F, and C clefs (you'll likely
need to play around with the numbers a bit):
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/internals/clefmodifier
HTH,
Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypo
Hello all,
In Gould (p. 506), it suggests that the clef modifier for the bass clef should
dangle from the tip of the bass clef. Lilypond does the following by default:
I would like to move this to the tip, but without affecting the modifier for
the treble clef (which is in the perfect
10 matches
Mail list logo
