Re: DrumStaff vs Staff for instrument name

Thanks David, I’ll use \with {} for that. JM > Le 13 déc. 2017 à 13:10, David Kastrup a écrit : > > David Kastrup > writes: > >> Caagr98 writes: >> >>> In `engraver-init.ly` (line 111 on my version), there is a line saying

Re: DrumStaff vs Staff for instrument name

David Kastrup writes: > Caagr98 writes: > >> In `engraver-init.ly` (line 111 on my version), there is a line saying >> `\alias "Staff"`. That line makes the DrumStaff context listen to >> `\set Staff.*` as well as `\set DrumStaff.*`. (DrumVoice is similarly >>

Re: DrumStaff vs Staff for instrument name

Caagr98 writes: > In `engraver-init.ly` (line 111 on my version), there is a line saying > `\alias "Staff"`. That line makes the DrumStaff context listen to > `\set Staff.*` as well as `\set DrumStaff.*`. (DrumVoice is similarly > aliased to Voice.) > > They're both equal, so

Re: DrumStaff vs Staff for instrument name

Hello Caagr98, Thanks for the explaination, and a nice day! JM > Le 13 déc. 2017 à 10:13, Caagr98 a écrit : > > In `engraver-init.ly` (line 111 on my version), there is a line saying > `\alias "Staff"`. That line makes the DrumStaff context listen to `\set > Staff.*` as

Re: DrumStaff vs Staff for instrument name

In `engraver-init.ly` (line 111 on my version), there is a line saying `\alias "Staff"`. That line makes the DrumStaff context listen to `\set Staff.*` as well as `\set DrumStaff.*`. (DrumVoice is similarly aliased to Voice.) They're both equal, so I'd recommend using `Staff.*` for consistency.

DrumStaff vs Staff for instrument name

Hello folks, In the example below, using Staff.instrumentName makes no difference compared to DrumStaff.instrumentName. Are both equivalent, or should DrumStaff.instrumentName clearly be preferred? Thanks for your help! JM — \version "2.19" P_PTwo_Staff_One_Voice_One = \relative { \key