Trevor Bača trevorbaca at gmail.com writes:
(I personally think that at least dynamics should exhibit baseline
alignment by default, but at least there's an easy workaround with
definitions like those above.)
Any text that aligns horisontally, should align on the baseline. For latin
scripts
This problem has been discussed before and in the mailing list
archives, you can find some tricks to get the desired alignment
using hidden letters, but I agree that it should be handled
better by default.
/Mats
Quoting Orm Finnendahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
as a follow-up: The same seems
Hi Mats,
thanks for the reply.
Am 03. Dezember 2006, 20:33 Uhr (+0100) schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
This problem has been discussed before and in the mailing list
archives
do you have any idea how the thread was called? I presume, the
workaround is similar to using a \strut box in TeX?
--
Orm
On 12/3/06, Orm Finnendahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mats,
thanks for the reply.
Am 03. Dezember 2006, 20:33 Uhr (+0100) schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
This problem has been discussed before and in the mailing list
archives
do you have any idea how the thread was called? I presume, the
Hi,
I observed a nasty behaviour trying to set the #'padding property of
the DynamicLineSpanner: The \p and \pp are not baseline-aligned with
the \ff or \mf.
Has this been reported before? To me this looks like something which
should rather get corrected in lilypond itself than cluttering the
Hi,
as a follow-up: The same seems to apply for TextSpanners in
general. In the following example, the baselines of the s.t. and
s.p. aren't aligned either:
\override TextSpanner #'edge-text = #'(s.t. . s.p.)
f2~ \startTextSpan f2 \stopTextSpan |
It looks pretty bad and the only fix in this
