Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote > Interestingly (perhaps only to me), the only other place I feel like I > took > a step backward in changing editors is that the (in-file) find/replace > mechanisms in sublime text are clunkier, especially since you can't use > them macros. >

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:12:54PM -0700, zzk wrote: > Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote > > Interestingly (perhaps only to me), the only other place I feel like > > I took a step backward in changing editors is that the (in-file) > > find/replace mechanisms in sublime text are

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

nces. > > Zoran Interestingly (perhaps only to me), the only other place I feel like I took a step backward in changing editors is that the (in-file) find/replace mechanisms in sublime text are clunkier, especially since you can't use them macros. I rather prefer emacs' M-x query replace

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

purposes, but I haven't been able to get the > >> Lilypond syntax highlighting to work in Vim. I followed the > >> instructions here: > >> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/text-editor-supp > > ort.html > >> > >> > >> On Nov 5

RE: LilyPond-aware text editors

Have you tried http://www.hochstrasser.org/index.php/CoolSoftware/NPPLilyPond ? MT Namens Knute Snortum Verzonden: zaterdag 7 november 2015 19:04 Aan: John Aten <welcome.to.eye.o.r...@gmail.com> CC: lilypond-user <lilypond-user@gnu.org> Onderwerp: Re: LilyPond-aware

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

t;>> ort.html >>>> >>>> >>>> On Nov 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Urs Liska wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was >>>>> always consider

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

o work in Vim. I followed the >> instructions here: >> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/text-editor-supp > ort.html >> >> >> On Nov 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Urs Liska wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> does anyone kno

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Urs Liska wrote: > Hi all, > > does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was always > considering the steps > - plain text editor > - enhanced editor > - IDE > > but suddenly have the impression that the second one doesn't actually

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

On Nov 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Urs Liska wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was always >> considering the steps - plain text editor - enhanced editor - >> IDE >> >> but suddenly have the impression that the sec

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

work in Vim. I followed >>>>> the instructions here: >>>>> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/text-editor-s > upp >> >>>>> > ort.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, U

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

ond editing environments. Best Urs > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LilyPond-aware-text-editors-tp183166p183217.html > Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ___

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

why not using an editor with a preview like http://frescobaldi.org/ ? -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LilyPond-aware-text-editors-tp183166p183217.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

On 05.11.2015 21:58, Thomas Morley wrote: 2015-11-05 16:18 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska : ... Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application but doesn't try to be an IDE? ... I mostly use jEdit. Me too. IDE-wise, I feel safer with minimalist homegrown,

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-LilyPond-aware-text-editors-tp183189p183208.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

ithub.com/textmate/lilypond.tmbundle TextMate is mac only ( http://macromates.com/ ) but I think I have seen other text editors support the TextMate bundle format. -Paul ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:18:21 +0100 Urs Liska wrote: > Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application > but doesn't try to be an IDE? Eh, Emacs? -- Johan ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

Am 05.11.2015 um 18:02 schrieb Johan Vromans: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:18:21 +0100 > Urs Liska wrote: > >> Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application >> but doesn't try to be an IDE? > Eh, Emacs? Well, Emacs tries to be the *mother* of all IDEs.

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

On 06/11/2015 04:21, Urs Liska wrote: Am 05.11.2015 um 18:02 schrieb Johan Vromans: On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:18:21 +0100 Urs Liska wrote: Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application but doesn't try to be an IDE? Eh, Emacs? Well, Emacs tries to

Re:LilyPond-aware text editors

Sublime Text is a rather friendly and modern text editor. http://www.sublimetext.com I becomes Lilypond-aware if you use a language package like this one: https://github.com/yrammos/SubLilyPond David Elaine Alt 415 . 341 .4954 "*Confusion is highly

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

On 11/5/2015 12:21 PM, Urs Liska wrote: Am 05.11.2015 um 18:02 schrieb Johan Vromans: On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:18:21 +0100 Urs Liska wrote: Is there *any* tool around that offers more than a notepad application but doesn't try to be an IDE? Eh, Emacs? Well, Emacs tries

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

2015-11-05 16:18 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org>: > Hi all, > > does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was always > considering the steps > - plain text editor > - enhanced editor > - IDE > > but suddenly have the impression that the

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

I use an app called Koder on iOS. It does syntax highlighting and some keyword completion for LilyPond files straight out of the box. It's not particularly useful for heavy or even medium weight lifting, but it's great for a quick proofread when I'm away from my main machine. Cameron Horsburgh

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

- Original Message - From: "Urs Liska" <u...@openlilylib.org> To: "lilypond-user" <lilypond-user@gnu.org> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 3:18 PM Subject: LilyPond-aware text editors Hi all, does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was alwa

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

Am 05.11.2015 um 16:27 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: > Hi Urs, > >> does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? […] >> What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at least syntax >> highlighting for LilyPond, and optionally one or more of the followi

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

Hi Urs, > Does this have LilyPond support? I can't see anything detailed on the website. Amongst other things, syntax-colouring is totally customizable. I wrote a basic Lilypond syntax-colour plist 11 years ago (cf. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2004-01/msg00668.html), but I

LilyPond-aware text editors

Hi all, does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? I was always considering the steps - plain text editor - enhanced editor - IDE but suddenly have the impression that the second one doesn't actually exist. What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at least syntax

Re: LilyPond-aware text editors

Hi Urs, > does anyone know of LilyPond-aware text editors? […] > What I consider an enhanced editor is a tool that gives at least syntax > highlighting for LilyPond, and optionally one or more of the following: > - code completion > - input helpers > - music functions > -

Re: editors

ems pretty powerful. I'm far too inexperienced with text editors to be able to say anything subtantial about it, but it does have the benefit of being open-source and meshing well with git-based workflows (which, as the blog has been discussing, is an interesting direction for Lily).

Re: editors

On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:28:18 -0700 Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote: > Among the recent threads that nearly touched off another editor war, I > wanted to mention that I've recently switched from using emacs to sublime > text. I want to stay far away from editor wars —I

Re: editors

'm far too inexperienced with text editors to be able to say anything subtantial about it, but it does have the benefit of being open-source and meshing well with git-based workflows (which, as the blog has been discussing, is an interesting direction for Lily). On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Johan Vrom

Re: editors

it a bit to help with the Lilypond book project, and -- so far -- it seems pretty powerful. I'm far too inexperienced with text editors to be able to say anything subtantial about it, but it does have the benefit of being open-source and meshing well with git-based workflows (which, as the blog has

editors

Among the recent threads that nearly touched off another editor war, I wanted to mention that I've recently switched from using emacs to sublime text. (Although I still use emacs for complicated macros.) I was happy to find this sublime text package for Lilypond, and wanted to let others know

Re: Editors

Am 25.06.2013 19:01, schrieb Joram Berger: I have *never* seen reply to group in any client I've worked with. It is usually called Reply All or Followup. Thunderbird calls it Reply to mailing list and it is an alternative choice to Reply to sender. My Thunderbird even gives me Reply to

Re: Editors

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Urs Liska wrote: Am 25.06.2013 19:01, schrieb Joram Berger: I have *never* seen reply to group in any client I've worked with. It is usually called Reply All or Followup. Thunderbird calls it Reply to mailing list and it is an alternative choice to Reply to sender.

Editors

In the Mac version of Lilypond, is there a way to: - prevent the application from creating a new file each time it is run - use an editor (eg, BBEdit) other than the default one Many thanks pr ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Editors

Am 25.06.2013 08:29, schrieb Philippe de Rochambeau: In the Mac version of Lilypond, is there a way to: - prevent the application from creating a new file each time it is run Sorry, I don't really understand what you mean. - use an editor (eg, BBEdit) other than the default one You can use

Re: Editors

/~nicola.vitacolonna/home/software Philippe -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Editors-tp147376p147380.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Editors

Hi, every time you double-click Lilypond for Mac, it create a new .ly file. I would just like to disable that. Philippe - Mail original - De: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org À: lilypond-user@gnu.org Envoyé: Mardi 25 Juin 2013 09:11:53 Objet: Re: Editors Am 25.06.2013 08:29, schrieb

Re: Editors

Liska u...@openlilylib.org À: lilypond-user@gnu.org Envoyé: Mardi 25 Juin 2013 09:11:53 Objet: Re: Editors Am 25.06.2013 08:29, schrieb Philippe de Rochambeau: In the Mac version of Lilypond, is there a way to: - prevent the application from creating a new file each time it is run Sorry, I

Re: Editors

Aarrgh, I forgot to send this to the list. I will never get used to the goofy way in which the LilyPond mailing list operates, not having the Reply-To header set to the list. It is the only mailing list I have ever been part of that doesn't have this as the default. On Jun 25, 2013, at

Re: Editors

Tim McNamara writes: Aarrgh, I forgot to send this to the list. I will never get used to the goofy way in which the LilyPond mailing list operates, not having the Reply-To header set to the list. It is the only mailing list I have ever been part of that doesn't have this as the default.

Re: Editors

Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote: Tim McNamara writes: Aarrgh, I forgot to send this to the list. I will never get used to the goofy way in which the LilyPond mailing list operates, not having the Reply-To header set to the list. It is the only mailing list I have ever been part of

Re: Editors

Tim Slattery slatter...@bls.gov writes: Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote: Tim McNamara writes: Aarrgh, I forgot to send this to the list. I will never get used to the goofy way in which the LilyPond mailing list operates, not having the Reply-To header set to the list. It is the

Re: Editors

I have *never* seen reply to group in any client I've worked with. It is usually called Reply All or Followup. Thunderbird calls it Reply to mailing list and it is an alternative choice to Reply to sender. ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Editors

David Kastrup writes: I have *never* seen reply to group in any client I've worked with. It is usually called Reply All or Followup. And usually invoked by typing F or R :-) Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com |

Re: Editors

Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes: David Kastrup writes: I have *never* seen reply to group in any client I've worked with. It is usually called Reply All or Followup. And usually invoked by typing F or R :-) You mean F or f (depending on whether you want to quote the original). R

Re: Editors

On 25 Jun 2013, at 18:39 , Tim Slattery wrote: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html A little late but count +1 for me Jan. Elm, which this guy loves, is an ancient, text-based email client. Not relevant, the principle holds with all mailers. I use a graphical email program

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Hello, On 5 October 2012 02:08, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote: Any estimates of the number of active users of lilypond? We could arrange feature fundings, with many users, say $20 each makes it eminently feasible - kickstarter for lilypond.. but kickstarter results in I think in 10%

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

James pkx1...@gmail.com writes: Hello, On 5 October 2012 02:08, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote: Any estimates of the number of active users of lilypond? We could arrange feature fundings, with many users, say $20 each makes it eminently feasible - kickstarter for lilypond.. but

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

I'm getting crowd-funded for my work on LilyPond, Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes: I'm getting crowd-funded for my work on LilyPond, Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com URL:https://github.com/whit537/www.gittip.com/issues/126 I am not convinced a crowd-funding service that has still to find a solution for making actual payouts is

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes: Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes: I'm getting crowd-funded for my work on LilyPond, Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com URL:https://github.com/whit537/www.gittip.com/issues/126 I am not convinced a crowd-funding service that has still to find a

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Werner LEMBERG writes: I'm getting crowd-funded for my work on LilyPond, Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com Have you read http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/ on Bradley Kuhn's http://sfconservancy.org/ Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org

FUNDING [WAS Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.]

Werner LEMBERG writes: I'm getting crowd-funded for my work on LilyPond, Another new thing: https://www.gittip.com Have you read http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/ on Bradley Kuhn's http://sfconservancy.org/ Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Have you read http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/ Not yet, thanks for that! on Bradley Kuhn's http://sfconservancy.org/ Actually, I've already asked for making FreeType a conservancy member some months ago, and it seems to be a quite slow process... Maybe we should do the same for

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes: Have you read http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/ Not yet, thanks for that! on Bradley Kuhn's http://sfconservancy.org/ Actually, I've already asked for making FreeType a conservancy member some months ago, and it seems to be a quite slow

Non-profit - was Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

On 10/5/12, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes: Have you read http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/ Not yet, thanks for that! on Bradley Kuhn's http://sfconservancy.org/ Actually, I've already asked for making FreeType a conservancy member some

Re: Non-profit - was Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net writes: On 10/5/12, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes: Have you read http://lwn.net/Articles/514964/ Not yet, thanks for that! on Bradley Kuhn's http://sfconservancy.org/ Actually, I've already asked for

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

I thought of a solution. This is not a quick task eventough I know what needs to be done, since such an editor, only more advanced, is Laborejo. For simple purposes it will be easy to do but quickly you encounter shortcomings and the display is unstatisfying again which is the point where the

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Any estimates of the number of active users of lilypond? We could arrange feature fundings, with many users, say $20 each makes it eminently feasible - kickstarter for lilypond.. but kickstarter results in I think in 10% or so lost to the middle men, but it could suffice. I'd be happy to pay

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

in a way that is visually similar to the actual score. As i've explained earlier, i think it's not feasible to do such formatting by hand - that's why i believe it's something that Lily editors could do. And they could allow to switch between regular and horizontal formatting. Is this explanation

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes: Am 03.10.2012 07:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł: Hi, sorry for delay... On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: Disabling automatic line wrapping and using horizontal scrolling is the

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Am 03.10.2012 10:12, schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes: Am 03.10.2012 07:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł: Hi, sorry for delay... On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: Disabling automatic line

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes: Am 03.10.2012 10:12, schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes: Am 03.10.2012 07:34, schrieb Janek Warchoł: Hi, sorry for delay... On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Janek Warchoł

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

to have my code formatted in a way that is visually similar to the actual score. As i've explained earlier, i think it's not feasible to do such formatting by hand - that's why i believe it's something that Lily editors could do. And they could allow to switch between regular and horizontal

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

This is not a quick task eventough I know what needs to be done, since such an editor, only more advanced, is Laborejo. For simple purposes it will be easy to do but quickly you encounter shortcomings and the display is unstatisfying again which is the point where the code need extensions and

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

I think MTX was doing that (or PMX?). I used it and would counsel to try it there. If you find it usefull, why not? Personally, I am happy with writing down on paper and transcribing then (when the music becomes to complicated form my poor coding habits). Francois 2012/10/3, David Kastrup

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

many people feel the same. That's why i'd like to have my code formatted in a way that is visually similar to the actual score. As i've explained earlier, i think it's not feasible to do such formatting by hand - that's why i believe it's something that Lily editors could do. And they could

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Nils Gey i...@nilsgey.de wrote: I thought of a solution. [...] Summary: It is totally possible, but I can't do it right now. So, 50 bucks will have to wait :) I'm actually surprised that noone pledged any additional bounty... Janek

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote: I think that what you want does actually exist, and it is called a spreadsheet. They are commonly used for (or primarily intended for) numbers and formulae laid out in rows and columns, although people do use them for pretty everything from I lost my

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

, and i'm sure many people feel the same. That's why i'd like to have my code formatted in a way that is visually similar to the actual score. As i've explained earlier, i think it's not feasible to do such formatting by hand - that's why i believe it's something that Lily editors could do

Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

, it becomes not-so-effective in my opinion. What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert regular lilypond to horizontal scroll and back? E.g. the code above would be displayed as (view using monospace font): { a4 b c d e f g a ea g f } { e4 a g f c2e d8

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

longer fragments this way (e.g. whole piece) - when there is a lot of overrides, articulations etc, it becomes not-so-effective in my opinion. What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert regular lilypond to horizontal scroll and back? E.g. the code above would be displayed

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Nils Gey l...@nilsgey.de writes: I have to see if Frescobaldi has an internal representation of durations and time signatures/bar length, but I guess not. Really? I know Emacs has it since it complains when you place bar checks at the wrong point of time. Frescobaldi, judging from its

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

of the current time signature. We could require the user to use bar checks - not an optimal solution, but i could live with that. I try to do it as as a standalone Python function so Fresobaldi and other editors can use it. No promises.. That would be cool! As i've said, if it will get

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote: What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert regular lilypond to horizontal scroll and back? E.g. the code above would be displayed as (view using monospace font): { a4 b c d e f g a ea g f

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Am 26.09.2012 13:53, schrieb Mats Bengtsson: On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote: What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert regular lilypond to horizontal scroll and back? E.g. the code above would be displayed as (view using monospace font

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote: On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote: What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert regular lilypond to horizontal scroll and back? E.g. the code above would

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote: On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote: What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability to convert regular lilypond to horizontal

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se wrote: On 09/26/2012 12:48 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote: What about editors like Frescobaldi having the ability

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes: But I think this would be quite complex, because the editor would have to know the musical moment we are at. Which seems complicated from the beginning, but if we start to (re-)use variables ... Seems like point-and-click Midi would deliver most of the

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

On 26 Sep 2012, at 14:06 , Urs Liska wrote: Oh yeah, that's something I'd second. In an ideal world these windows wouldn't only go into the same file but into the same piece of music. TexShop does this (partly) for you: 2 windows can be open on one and the same file, updates in one

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Wim van Dommelen m...@wimvd.nl wrote: TexShop does this (partly) for you: 2 windows can be open on one and the same file, updates in one window are immediately live in the other. Vim can do that with as many windows as you'd like... Christ van Willegen -- 09

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

2012/9/26 Christ van Willegen cvwille...@gmail.com: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Wim van Dommelen m...@wimvd.nl wrote: TexShop does this (partly) for you: 2 windows can be open on one and the same file, updates in one window are immediately live in the other. Vim can do that with as many

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

2012/9/26 Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de: Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup: To me it sounds more like what you'd want here is several windows into the same file with synchronized cursor motion for things happening at the same musical time. Oh yeah, that's something I'd second. In an

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com writes: 2012/9/26 Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de: Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup: To me it sounds more like what you'd want here is several windows into the same file with synchronized cursor motion for things happening at the same musical time.

Re: Parallel music view - inspiration for LilyPond editors.

On 27/09/12 01:41, Francisco Vila wrote: 2012/9/26 Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de: Am 26.09.2012 14:03, schrieb David Kastrup: To me it sounds more like what you'd want here is several windows into the same file with synchronized cursor motion for things happening at the same musical time. Oh

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

Op Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:20:43 -0400 Brett McCoy idragos...@gmail.com schreef: I was thinking recently what would really make Frescobaldi rock even more is customizable keybindings, I would love to have emacs keybindings. You can customize the keybindings in Frescobaldi 1.x: Settings-Configure

Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

I'm in search of the best of both worlds ly editor. I've gotten started with Frescobaldi. Autocompletion is invaluable, and the integrated PDF view and help browser is a real lifesaver. But, I use Emacs for just about everything else. So I had a look at LilyPond mode. + Documentation is

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

On 06/20/2011 05:28 AM, James Harkins wrote: - PDF display is treated as a compilation process. To view a new rendering, I'm forced to close the old viewer window first (!). (Also a bit of sloppiness in the Emacs variable handling -- since I don't have xpdf on my system, I changed the

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:28 AM, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com wrote: I'm in search of the best of both worlds ly editor. I've gotten started with Frescobaldi. Autocompletion is invaluable, and the integrated PDF view and help browser is a real lifesaver. But, I use Emacs for just

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

At Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:51:54 -0400, Christopher R. Maden wrote: What OS are you using? I use Evince under Ubuntu/GNOME to view PDF files, and it automatically notes when the file has changed. When I recompile in Emacs, Evince refreshes the view momentarily afterward. Evince or one of the

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

At Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:20:43 -0400, Brett McCoy wrote: I've used both the emacs lilypond mode and Frescobaldi. I like the emacs mode because, well, it's emacs, but in the end, though, I think I prefer using Frescobaldi just because it has more music-related features than emacs... Oh, right...

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:28 AM, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com wrote: At Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:20:43 -0400, Brett McCoy wrote: I've used both the emacs lilypond mode and Frescobaldi. I like the emacs mode because, well, it's emacs, but in the end, though, I think I prefer using Frescobaldi

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

James == James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes: James At Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:51:54 -0400, Christopher R. Maden wrote: What OS are you using? I use Evince under Ubuntu/GNOME to view PDF files, and it automatically notes when the file has changed. When I recompile in Emacs, Evince

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

At Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:33:48 +1000, Peter Chubb wrote: I just do C-c C-c and then View --- xpdf then runs in the background. C-c C-c again reruns lilypond, hit R in the Xpdf window and it refreshes. Done! Thanks for the tips, will play with it some more. I'm actually leaning back toward

Re: Editors? Emacs bindings for Frescobaldi?

James == James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes: James At Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:33:48 +1000, Peter Chubb wrote: I just do C-c C-c and then View --- xpdf then runs in the background. C-c C-c again reruns lilypond, hit R in the Xpdf window and it refreshes. Done! James Hm... no, that's not

Re: lilypond GUI editors

the wrong fonts (clefs, timesignatures) when I try to use 2.13. Why is life so complicated ... -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/lilypond-GUI-editors-tp28764971p28779821.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

lilypond GUI editors

Hi, Playing around with the latest versions of Lilypond, Frescobaldi, and Canorus I noticed that: Frescobaldi-1.1.1 requires, correct me if I am wrong, Lilypond 2.13 But Canorus needs Lilypond 2.12. It displays the wrong fonts (clefs, timesignatures) when I try to use 2.13. Why is life

Re: lilypond GUI editors

Op donderdag 03-06-2010 om 11:02 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Martin Tarenskeen: Why is life so complicated ... Would life be fun if everything always worked? -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyOfSource.com | Avatar®

  1   2   >