Valentin Petzel writes:
> Am Sonntag, 9. Juli 2023, 09:42:52 CEST schrieb David Kastrup:
>> The latter is definitely the _natural_ way to enter this construct
>> (single voice simultaneity) but I do seem to remember that LilyPond did
>> not deal well with it?
>
> The thing is that if we combine
Am Sonntag, 9. Juli 2023, 09:42:52 CEST schrieb David Kastrup:
> The latter is definitely the _natural_ way to enter this construct
> (single voice simultaneity) but I do seem to remember that LilyPond did
> not deal well with it?
The thing is that if we combine Simultaneous Music with implicit
Thank you, Valentin and David.
I was not aware that << >> construct can be used this way.
> I do seem to remember that LilyPond did
> not deal well with it?
“1.5.1 Single voice — Simultaneous expressions” of NR says:
This can be useful if the simultaneous sections have identical rhythms, but
Thank you Valentin
Le dim. 9 juil. 2023 à 09:26, Valentin Petzel a écrit :
> Hello Pierre,
>
> I think this should rather be
>
> { <\tweak duration-log #2 g \tweak duration-log #2 e' e''>2^. }
>
> Alternatively one can simply do
>
> \new Voice << g4 e' e''2^. >>
>
> (the \new Voice is necessary
Valentin Petzel writes:
> Hello Pierre,
>
> I think this should rather be
>
> { <\tweak duration-log #2 g \tweak duration-log #2 e' e''>2^. }
>
> Alternatively one can simply do
>
> \new Voice << g4 e' e''2^. >>
>
> (the \new Voice is necessary as there has been no music before this, so there
>
Hello Pierre,
I think this should rather be
{ <\tweak duration-log #2 g \tweak duration-log #2 e' e''>2^. }
Alternatively one can simply do
\new Voice << g4 e' e''2^. >>
(the \new Voice is necessary as there has been no music before this, so there
does not exist a voice, and Lilypond will
Thank you, Pierre!
I’ve realized that an example is in "5.3.4 The \tweak command” in NR by
searching “duration-log”.
Thanks again.
> 2023/07/09 14:11、Pierre Perol-Schneider
> のメール:
>
> PS. Added to the LSR: https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1170
>
> Le dim. 9 juil. 2023 à 07:07, Pierre
PS. Added to the LSR: https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1170
Le dim. 9 juil. 2023 à 07:07, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi Jun,
> I'd do:
>
> { ^. }
>
> For some reason I couldn't find the dedicated documentation.
> Cheers,
> Pierre
>
> Le dim. 9 juil.
Hi Jun,
I'd do:
{ ^. }
For some reason I couldn't find the dedicated documentation.
Cheers,
Pierre
Le dim. 9 juil. 2023 à 06:54, Jun Tamura a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> Is there a recommended practice to engrave a triple-stop for the violin as
> in the attached example - notes with different
Hello!
Is there a recommended practice to engrave a triple-stop for the violin as in
the attached example - notes with different durations in a single triple-stop?
The example is from the 1st violin part, bar 24, 1st movement, piano concerto
no. 3 by Beethoven. This quite often appears in
10 matches
Mail list logo
