Dear Graham,
thanks for your mail. You confirm what I found so far, too. And after
having read your mail, I also see that lib.ly is missing from the zip file.
> Even so, it is very sad
> that this remarkable improvement to lilypond appears to remain unusable.
That's really a pity. I still hope
On Wed, 2016-05-11 at 22:31 +0200, Noeck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> were there changes since "Extended mensural notation support for Lilypond":
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2015-02/msg00152.html
>
> Or in other words, can someone please show me h
Hi,
were there changes since "Extended mensural notation support for Lilypond":
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2015-02/msg00152.html
Or in other words, can someone please show me how to use it? Is it
usable directly or do I need to patch lilypond somehow? There
Hi,
can somebody tell me what happend to this topic:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Draft-Extended-mensural-notation-support-td172204.html
I have seen some discussion on devel and also some issues where code
related to this seems to be included in some 2.19 versions. But I could
not find
