Hello folks,
I find it convenient when I don’t have to play for a number of measures to
decompose the multiple rests in portions corresponding to what the others play,
and to have bar numbers showing up here and then to help catching up when I’ve
got to blow again.
What I don’t understand in
On 26/12/2015 11:26, Menu Jacques wrote:
> Hello Greg,
>
> Yes, exactly, thanks for the trick!
>
> JM
>
>> Le 26 déc. 2015 à 11:54, Greg a écrit :
>>
>> On 26/12/2015 09:40, Menu Jacques wrote:
>>> Hello folks,
>>>
>>> I find it convenient when I don’t have to play for a
Hello Greg,
Now that’s quality service, also suggesting that layout could factorize things
out!
JM
> Le 26 déc. 2015 à 12:38, Greg a écrit :
>
> On 26/12/2015 11:26, Menu Jacques wrote:
>> Hello Greg,
>>
>> Yes, exactly, thanks for the trick!
>>
>> JM
>>
>>> Le 26
Hello Greg,
Yes, exactly, thanks for the trick!
JM
> Le 26 déc. 2015 à 11:54, Greg a écrit :
>
> On 26/12/2015 09:40, Menu Jacques wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> I find it convenient when I don’t have to play for a number of measures to
>> decompose the multiple rests
On 26/12/2015 09:40, Menu Jacques wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I find it convenient when I don’t have to play for a number of measures to
> decompose the multiple rests in portions corresponding to what the others
> play, and to have bar numbers showing up here and then to help catching up
> when