On 7 Oct 2007, at 21:16, Graham Percival wrote:
On 7 Oct 2007, at 01:13, Graham Percival wrote:
I've identified the following areas to work on; please add items
or discuss them.
As for the section 6.6, the Harvard Concise Dictionary of Music
calls it expression marks, which includes tempo
On 8 Oct 2007, at 17:24, Francisco Vila wrote:
El Mon, 08 de Oct de 2007, a las 04:45:36PM +0200, Hans Aberg dijo:
On 8 Oct 2007, at 16:38, Francisco Vila wrote:
Search the list archives and read the first messages with GDP in
the subject.
GDP is for Grand Documentation Project.
Thank you.
Hans Aberg wrote:
On 8 Oct 2007, at 17:24, Francisco Vila wrote:
GDP is not official yet. Editions are not affecting to the current
docs, be stable or development. They are on a different branch. If you
want to see
the actual state, follow the link
On 8 Oct 2007, at 20:06, Graham Percival wrote:
GDP is not official yet. Editions are not affecting to the
current docs, be stable or development. They are on a different
branch. If you want to see
the actual state, follow the link http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?
p=lilypond.git;a=summary and
Hans Aberg wrote:
On 8 Oct 2007, at 20:06, Graham Percival wrote:
No, because GDP _is_ the next version of the lilypond docs.
This would be only if you want people to read it before it has been made
the official docs.
I post a link to
http://opihi.cs.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
about twice a week
On 8 Oct 2007, at 20:48, Graham Percival wrote:
No, because GDP _is_ the next version of the lilypond docs.
This would be only if you want people to read it before it has
been made the official docs.
I post a link to
http://opihi.cs.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
about twice a week on this mailist.
I really don't understand what you're complaining about.
Hans Aberg wrote:
One problem is that the traffic here is so heavy, that it is hard to
read it all.
And I went to that link, but when I click on it, it says:
LilyPond documentation Version 2.11.32
Nothing really that giving any hint
On 8 Oct 2007, at 22:09, Graham Percival wrote:
I really don't understand what you're complaining about.
It is your project, so you do whatever you want.
But if you want more inputs, I think that at Quick Links at http://
lilypond.org/web/ you should put up a link GDP (Grand Documentation
On 7 Oct 2007, at 01:13, Graham Percival wrote:
I've identified the following areas to work on; please add items or
discuss them.
As for the section 6.6, the Harvard Concise Dictionary of Music
calls it expression marks, which includes tempo and dynamic marks,
legato, staccato, bowing,
On 7 Oct 2007, at 01:13, Graham Percival wrote:
I've identified the following areas to work on; please add items or =20=
discuss them.
I don't know if this sort of thing is what you're asking for...
For me, the biggest problem is the one which is stated as a Bug in the manual
about the
Miguel Lopes Santos Ramos wrote:
On 7 Oct 2007, at 01:13, Graham Percival wrote:
I've identified the following areas to work on; please add items or =20=
discuss them.
I don't know if this sort of thing is what you're asking for...
For me, the biggest problem is the one which is stated as a
Hans Aberg wrote:
On 7 Oct 2007, at 01:13, Graham Percival wrote:
I've identified the following areas to work on; please add items or
discuss them.
As for the section 6.6, the Harvard Concise Dictionary of Music calls
it expression marks, which includes tempo and dynamic marks, legato,
Unfortunately, that it outside the scope of this project. This is the
Grand _Documentation_ Project.
Ah!
My mistake. :-)
Perhaps I can help after I finnish this piece.
I know LISP well, but this is a particularly intricate program,
very hard to understand.
See you,
Miguel
I've identified the following areas to work on; please add items or
discuss them.
- Proportional notation (introduction): delete entirely? Where
should we stick links to the real section?
- Time administration: rewrite, or move to somewhere else?
REWRITE
- durations (including redoing the
14 matches
Mail list logo
