Re: GDP: pitches second draft

2007-10-22 Thread Eyolf Østrem
On 22.10.2007 (11:56), Trevor Daniels wrote: > > I see the note on the lowest staff has now been changed to a > C, but this is the bass C, not middle C. Arrghh. Corrected in next update. Thanks. eyolf GDP helper and typo-(ir)responsible -- _/I\_o__o___/I\ l * /

RE: GDP: pitches second draft

2007-10-22 Thread Trevor Daniels
October 2007 08:58 > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Re: GDP: pitches second draft > > > > Dear Graham, > > The job you've done looks very nice. > > One thing caught my eye, though. I don't quite > get the idea of one image > under "1.1.3 Displ

Re: GDP: pitches second draft

2007-10-17 Thread Graham Percival
I agree with Mats. As a further caution, Rune: if your patch significantly changes the input format, the chances of it being accepted are lower. Cheers, - Graham Mats Bengtsson wrote: How would this affect the user interface? I got the impression that it was mostly a matter of the internal

Re: GDP: pitches second draft

2007-10-17 Thread Graham Percival
Thanks for catching this; we'll fix it soon. Cheers, - Graham Risto Vääräniemi wrote: Dear Graham, The job you've done looks very nice. One thing caught my eye, though. I don't quite get the idea of one image under "1.1.3 Displaying pitches" namely "Clef". If the image tries to point out t

Re: GDP: pitches second draft

2007-10-17 Thread Mats Bengtsson
A few minor comments: - Why are the links to the Program reference of LedgerLineSpanner and NoteHead in the subsection on Accidentals? To me it would be just as intuitive (or non-intuitive) to have these links some other of subsubsections of 1.1 Pitches, or even in 1.1 Pitches itself. The c

Re: GDP: pitches second draft

2007-10-17 Thread Mats Bengtsson
How would this affect the user interface? I got the impression that it was mostly a matter of the internal representation in the implementation. /Mats Rune Zedeler wrote: I am working on splitting the pitch into pitchclass and pitch. - Pitchclasses not containing octave information. I am not

Re: GDP: pitches second draft

2007-10-17 Thread Rune Zedeler
I am working on splitting the pitch into pitchclass and pitch. - Pitchclasses not containing octave information. I am not nearly finished with this, and perhaps the whole thing will be rejected. But I think it would be a shame to do a lot of work on the Pitch documentation just before a change l

Re: GDP: pitches second draft

2007-10-17 Thread Risto Vääräniemi
Dear Graham, The job you've done looks very nice. One thing caught my eye, though. I don't quite get the idea of one image under "1.1.3 Displaying pitches" namely "Clef". If the image tries to point out the location of the middle C on each staff / clef why there is an F on the lowest staff? S

GDP: pitches second draft

2007-10-16 Thread Graham Percival
GDP has a new home, which should be much more reliable: http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/ (follow the link to GDP output) This is the second draft of Pitches. Please have a look; it's been significantly updated. Remaining items are Misc formatting: - add more links to glossary - maybe more lin