On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:53:46PM +0200, James Bailey wrote:
>
> On Oct 24, 2010, at 10:08 PM, James Lowe wrote:
> >
> > What I don't understand is what the *1/4 and *4 are doing in this
> > context. Is this documented?
>
> See 1.2.1 in the Notation Reference, Scaling Durations.
I personally
On Oct 24, 2010, at 10:08 PM, James Lowe wrote:
>
> What I don't understand is what the *1/4 and *4 are doing in this
> context. Is this documented?
>
> James
See 1.2.1 in the Notation Reference, Scaling Durations.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lil
Hello
On 24/10/2010 20:48, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:14 PM, James Lowe
wrote:
>> > I wonder if someone can help me find a way to shit the 10-tuplet over
> (no comment)
:-#
I'm surprised my email server let that one through. Sorry, I guess I had
better clean my
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:14 PM, James Lowe wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
> I wonder if someone can help me find a way to shit the 10-tuplet over
(no comment)
> to the 'left' slightly, or move the group of tuplet-ed notes closer to the
> first and leave the secpnd beamed group (and minim) where they ar
Hello,
Here is a snippet
\relative c' {
b8.^-
[ \times 2/10 { c64( d ees d e d c b a b] }
a8. a16 a32 a2)
}
I wonder if someone can help me find a way to shit the 10-tuplet over to the
'left' slightly, or move the group of tuplet-ed notes closer to the first and
leave the secpnd
