that said i don't even have icons so.
Stephen
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
This assumes one has a file manager that is a GUI (it's hard to do
this in say midnight commander or xterm)
for those without you can cd to your lilypond directory and put the fonts
there.
I use
cd /usr/local/lilypond-current/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/fonts/
ls
otf svg
HTH
, should I copy the
> fonts.scm file to the scm folder? thanks again y’all.
>
Only if you are using a version prior to 2.19.12, then that file is
necessary.
HTH,
Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Fwd-Help-with-fonts-from-a-blind-user-tp188259p
Daniel Contreras
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Daniel Contreras <daniel.c.9...@gmail.com>
> Date: March 7, 2016 at 4:09:00 PM CST
> To: Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca>
> Subject: Re: Help with fonts from a blind user
>
> Hello Kieren and
"include" the folder that
has the lilyjazz.ily and jazzchords.ily stylesheets if they aren't in the
score's working directory, which will most likely be the case.
HTH,
Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Help-with-fonts-from-a-blind-use
Hi Daniel,
> Can anyone point me in the right direction as to how and where to install
> these font files.
1. Right- [or control-] click on your Lilypond application file/icon, and from
the contextual menu choose “Show Package Contents”.
2. Navigate down to the Contents > Resources > share >
Hello Lilyponders,
Abraham kindly sent me the latest lilyjazz fonts a few days ago. My question
now is, what now? haha. I admit that I am a little clueless as to what to do
with these files. I am running lilypond 2.18.2 on mavericks. Can anyone point
me in the right direction as to how and
Hello.
[Sorry for starting a new thread on the same problem, but I fear that
the old one now is deeply buried in the Lily experts' mailbox, since
my own comments/infos on the issue didn't elicit any reply.]
I think that I'm zeroing on the problem.
Here attached a screenshot of two gv zoom
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.6/input/regression/out-www/lily-1601320616.ly
On the resulting postscript, the Bulgarian and Portuguese are fine.
But not the Japanese nor the Hebrew. No Japanese fonts are installed,
but Hebrew fonts are!
Could someone point me to maybe some command to
Hello.
I can't comment on why it works for me and not for you. When it was
announced that the Unicode support was in there, I tried it and it
worked.
I copied the following sample:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.6/input/regression/out-www/lily-1601320616.ly
On the resulting postscript, the
The file structure is somewhat different in the teTeX 3 distribution
compared to teTeX 2. The corresponding changes were introduced for the
LilyPond files in version 2.4.5, but maybe the ec fonts package that
you use hasn't been updated correspondingly?
/Mats
Doug Asherman wrote:
Hi:
I think I
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
The file structure is somewhat different in the teTeX 3 distribution
compared to teTeX 2. The corresponding changes were introduced for the
LilyPond files in version 2.4.5, but maybe the ec fonts package that
you use hasn't been updated correspondingly?
That may be it --
Hi:
I think I may have seen something about this on the list already. I
can't seem to find the pertinent posts.
When running the combination of Lilypond 2.4.5 and teTeX 3.0 under
Linux, Lilypond can't seem to find the ec fonts. The .ps and .pdf files
are missing all those fonts.
I can get
Good!
However, I checked the contents of the lilypond-2.0.1-1.i386.rpm
file available at lilypond.org today and it seems to be newer than
your failing files (%%CreationDate: Tue Sep 30 11:34:53 2003 in the
header of the feta13.pfa file, whereas yours was from Sep 29). Maybe it
was corrected after
The .map file is probably OK, but the critical thing is that the
feta*.pfa files really belong to your current LilyPond version.
What does
grep CreationDate `kpsewhich feta20.pfa`
return?
The flag -u -lilypond.map tells dvips to use the scalable fonts
*.pfa instead of bitmap fonts *.*pk in the
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 11:16, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
The .map file is probably OK, but the critical thing is that the
feta*.pfa files really belong to your current LilyPond version.
What does
grep CreationDate `kpsewhich feta20.pfa`
return?
%%CreationDate: Mon Sep 29 03:59:26 2003
Robert de Vries wrote:
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 11:16, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
The .map file is probably OK, but the critical thing is that the
feta*.pfa files really belong to your current LilyPond version.
What does
grep CreationDate `kpsewhich feta20.pfa`
return?
%%CreationDate: Mon Sep 29
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 14:02, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
It would be interesting to see the lines printed out by dvips.
On my machine, it says something like
This is dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye Software
(www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2003.10.07:1249' - a.ps
Everything looks just normal. Acroread 5.0 on Linux should work
fine, but maybe you should send (as attachments or refering to a
WWW page) a small example file (preferably including both the .ly,
the .ps and .pdf) so we could check. Also, describe exactly the
command you use to produce the file.
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 15:21, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Everything looks just normal. Acroread 5.0 on Linux should work
fine, but maybe you should send (as attachments or refering to a
WWW page) a small example file (preferably including both the .ly,
the .ps and .pdf) so we could check.
There's something strange with the feta13.pfa that's embedded in the
your Postscript file. Unfortunately, I'm not fluent enough in Postscript
to realize what the problem is. You mentioned in your first email that
you had installed the 2.0.1 redhat version as made available from the
download page.
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 17:23, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
There's something strange with the feta13.pfa that's embedded in the
your Postscript file. Unfortunately, I'm not fluent enough in Postscript
to realize what the problem is. You mentioned in your first email that
you had installed the
Make sure that the files lilypond.map and feta20.pfa are installed and
belong to the 2.0.0 installation. Also, make sure that the teTeX
filename database is up to date by running 'texhash' as root.
To find out where dvips finds the files, run the following commands:
kpsewhich --format='dvips
I have the same problem. The results of the builtin ps conversion look
dreadful.
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 11:23, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Make sure that the files lilypond.map and feta20.pfa are installed and
belong to the 2.0.0 installation. Also, make sure that the teTeX
filename database is
Robert de Vries writes:
I have the same problem. The results of the builtin ps conversion look
dreadful.
For me the problem was that the file /etc/texmf/dvips/lilypond.map
was a symbolic link pointing to a lilypond.map of my old distribution
(1.6.6) that didn't exist anymore. What solved my
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 21:30, Marcelo Gomes de Queiroz wrote:
Robert de Vries writes:
I have the same problem. The results of the builtin ps conversion look
dreadful.
For me the problem was that the file /etc/texmf/dvips/lilypond.map
was a symbolic link pointing to a lilypond.map of
26 matches
Mail list logo
