On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:59 PM Thomas Morley
wrote:
> Am Sa., 20. Juni 2020 um 17:18 Uhr schrieb Ralph Palmer
> :
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 6:28 AM Karlin High
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/20/2020 7:37 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> >> > I'd say we need more people for LSR-work.
> >> >
> >> >
Am Sa., 20. Juni 2020 um 17:18 Uhr schrieb Ralph Palmer
:
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 6:28 AM Karlin High wrote:
>>
>> On 6/20/2020 7:37 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
>> > I'd say we need more people for LSR-work.
>> >
>> > Furthermore, some time ago I started to upgrade LSR to 2.20, but had
>> > to
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 6:28 AM Karlin High wrote:
> On 6/20/2020 7:37 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> > I'd say we need more people for LSR-work.
> >
> > Furthermore, some time ago I started to upgrade LSR to 2.20, but had
> > to stop this work as well.
> > No idea, when I'm able to continue...
>
>
On 6/20/2020 7:37 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
I'd say we need more people for LSR-work.
Furthermore, some time ago I started to upgrade LSR to 2.20, but had
to stop this work as well.
No idea, when I'm able to continue...
Can the work be described in step-by-step instructions? If so, it could
Am Fr., 19. Juni 2020 um 22:57 Uhr schrieb Valentin Villenave
:
>
> On 6/19/20, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
> The LSR is only tended to by “Thomas Morley” and myself these days
> (and unlike him, I am doing a lousy job of it),
Well, I can't say I'm doing it better.
In times of Corona my workload
On 6/19/20, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
> But this seems not to have been taken up for the database, neither as an
> addition nor as a replacement for 792 (see
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Search?q=clef+change).
> Did I do something wrong?
No, you did everything right (TBH, you could also have
Folks,
some months ago I tried to improve an LSR snippet
(http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=792 "Clef change at the beginning of
a piece"); namely, I added support for the use of key signatures which
the original LSR solution messes up (*).
Following the instructions in
