Re: Knees and spacing: bug?

2007-01-05 Thread uunail
Michael As Han-Wen is pointing out, the algorithm is correctly trying to keep the distances constant. If you want to change the output you may consider moving the objects instead of changing the durations. I have done this in your example by moving the 16th in the first bar a little bit to the

Re: Knees and spacing: bug?

2007-01-05 Thread uunail
Michael As Han-Wen is pointing out, the algorithm is correctly trying to keep the distances constant. If you want to change the output you may consider moving the objects instead of changing the durations. I have done this in your example by moving the 16th in the first bar a little bit to the

Re: Knees and spacing: bug?

2007-01-05 Thread uunail
Michael As Han-Wen is pointing out, the algorithm is correctly trying to keep the distances constant. If you want to change the output you may consider moving the objects instead of changing the durations. I have done this in your example by moving the 16th in the first bar a little bit to the

Re: Knees and spacing: bug?

2007-01-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Michael Krause escreveu: > Hello list, > > I'm having problems with spacing in the presence of kneed beams, see the > attached image for illustration: you're asking for the impossible. The heads have to be aligned between staves because they happen at the same time. Yet you want to have regular

Knees and spacing: bug?

2007-01-05 Thread Michael Krause
Hello list, I'm having problems with spacing in the presence of kneed beams, see the attached image for illustration: Bar 1: Automatic knees in the upper staff. Result: the 16th in the lower staff is much too close to the following 8th. Bar 2: Disabled knees in the upper staff - now the lower st