Re: LSR status

2008-08-30 Thread Damian leGassick
completely in contrast to reinhold, i'm always put out when i have to go to LSR in search of something that's not in the docs. surely if a snippet deserves/needs to be in LSR it should be incorporated into the next revision of the docs? cheers d On 27 Aug 2008, at 15:01, Reinhold

Re: LSR status

2008-08-30 Thread Johan Vromans
Damian leGassick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: surely if a snippet deserves/needs to be in LSR it should be incorporated into the next revision of the docs? I'd consider the LSR complementary to the docs. -- Johan Chord is alive! http://chordii.sourceforge.net

Re: LSR status

2008-08-30 Thread Damian leGassick
which brings us back to the beginning of the thread it's status is a bit vague, so people aren't always sure where's the best place to look i agree with graham that 'complementary' status encourages a wiki mentality - personally i'd be happy never to see another wiki again :-) d On 30

Re: LSR status

2008-08-30 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/8/30 Damian leGassick [EMAIL PROTECTED]: surely if a snippet deserves/needs to be in LSR it should be incorporated into the next revision of the docs? Actually, the docs only include a selection of the most relevant snippets. The LSR is not only meant for pedagogical purposes, but also

Re: LSR status

2008-08-30 Thread Damian leGassick
On 30 Aug 2008, at 12:13, Valentin Villenave wrote: Plus, it's some kind of a laboratory that helps improving the docs (after selection and edition of the chosen snippets). that would be my preferred 'status' cheers d ___ lilypond-user mailing

Re: LSR status

2008-08-27 Thread Graham Percival
On 8/26/08, Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/8/25 Kieren MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Kieren, However, if the Lilypond community is depending on *any* resource as heavily as it appears to be (or want to be) relying on the LSR, that resource needs to maintain ~ 99%

Re: LSR status

2008-08-27 Thread Eluze Weehaeli
Am 27.08.2008, 10:41 Uhr, schrieb Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I wouldn't say that it would be a disaster; I still don't think that it's been used enough to say that the loss would be *that* bad. How can U use it if it is not available 99% of the time...(at least the last 2 weeks)?!

Re: LSR status

2008-08-27 Thread Eluze Weehaeli
Am 27.08.2008, 11:02 Uhr, schrieb Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Am 27.08.2008, 10:41 Uhr, schrieb Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I wouldn't say that it would be a disaster; I still don't think that it's been used enough to say that the loss would be *that* bad. How can U use it

Re: LSR status

2008-08-27 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 schrieb Eluze Weehaeli: Am 27.08.2008, 11:02 Uhr, schrieb Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]: That's what I recommend, anyway -- that way you get (relatively) good, sensible snippets. If you look at LSR itself, you

Re: LSR status

2008-08-26 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/8/25 Kieren MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Kieren, However, if the Lilypond community is depending on *any* resource as heavily as it appears to be (or want to be) relying on the LSR, that resource needs to maintain ~ 99% uptime. If the current LSR hosting situation is unable to

LSR status

2008-08-25 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hello all, I'm writing to express my frustration at the intermittent availability of the LSR — since returning from Edinburgh (about two weeks ago), I've tried nearly a dozen times to connect/search (including just a few minutes ago), and was successful precisely once. I want to submit