Re: Large set of parts

On 29/04/18 13:42, Wol's lists wrote: > On 29/04/18 00:00, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> On 28/04/18 04:46, Karlin High wrote: >>> On 4/27/2018 8:28 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote: It falls into the category of alliteration, which abounds in English >>> >>> As a poetry form, too - "Beowulf" and J. R. R

Re: Large set of parts

Hi Wol, Metre is the word you are looking for! On 29 April 2018 at 22:42, Wol's lists wrote: > Shakespeare is almost all poetry, not prose. And it rarely rhymes. I can't > remember the correct term, but poetry is defined by repeating rhythms, not > by rhyming. Much like music, actually ... :-)

Re: Large set of parts

On 29/04/18 00:00, J Martin Rushton wrote: On 28/04/18 04:46, Karlin High wrote: On 4/27/2018 8:28 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote: It falls into the category of alliteration, which abounds in English As a poetry form, too - "Beowulf" and J. R. R. Tolkien's unfinished work "The Fall of Arthur" come

Re: Large set of parts

On 28/04/18 04:46, Karlin High wrote: > On 4/27/2018 8:28 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote: >> It falls into the category of alliteration, which abounds in English > > As a poetry form, too - "Beowulf" and J. R. R. Tolkien's unfinished work > "The Fall of Arthur" come to mind. Sort of like "rhyming" the b

Re: Large set of parts

On 4/27/2018 8:28 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote: It falls into the category of alliteration, which abounds in English As a poetry form, too - "Beowulf" and J. R. R. Tolkien's unfinished work "The Fall of Arthur" come to mind. Sort of like "rhyming" the beginnings of the words instead of the ending

Re: Large set of parts

Hi Shane, It's not really a tongue twister for Mandarin speakers, so much as a wonderful play on tones on the same phoneme. It's not hard to pronounce - my definition of a tongue twister - but just a glorious play with language. There's only four tones in Mandarin. [This latter point can be argued

Re: Large set of parts

On 4/27/2018 5:17 PM, shane wrote: There is a chinese tongue twister that is really long and consists entirely of the sound "shi." Oh, dear - tonal language yet too. I give up in advance. There are probably two to seven differently-toned "shi" sounds... -- Karlin High Missouri, USA _

Re: Large set of parts

m: Jacques Menu Muzhic Date: 4/27/18 3:51 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Werner LEMBERG Cc: d...@gnu.org, nathan.r.sprang...@maine.edu, lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Large set of parts Excellent, Werner! JM > Le 27 avr. 2018 à 20:17, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > > >>> Guiness

Re: Large set of parts

> ah, the wonders of the English language “Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.” is a grammatically correct sentence. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo) =) Kieren. Kieren M

Re: Large set of parts

Excellent, Werner! JM > Le 27 avr. 2018 à 20:17, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > > >>> Guiness Book claim for worst tongue-twister: >>> >>> "The sixth sick sheikh's sixth sick sheep's sixth sheep's sick" >>> >>> Say it several times fast for full effect. >> >> The worst German one I know is "Bra

Re: Large set of parts

>> Guiness Book claim for worst tongue-twister: >> >> "The sixth sick sheikh's sixth sick sheep's sixth sheep's sick" >> >> Say it several times fast for full effect. > > The worst German one I know is "Brautkleid bleibt Brautkleid und > Blaukraut bleibt Blaukraut. Blaukraut bleibt Blaukraut und

Tongue twisters (was: Large set of parts)

David Kastrup writes: > Karlin High writes: > >> On 4/27/2018 9:07 AM, Guy Stalnaker wrote: >>> "very thoroughly thought through (…ah, the wonders of the English >>> language <3 )" >>> >>> Brilliant! >>> >>> :-) >>> >>> Guy Stalnaker >>> jimmyg...@gmail.com >> >> Gui

Re: Large set of parts

Karlin High writes: > On 4/27/2018 9:07 AM, Guy Stalnaker wrote: >> "very thoroughly thought through (…ah, the wonders of the English >> language <3 )" >> >> Brilliant! >> >> :-) >> >> Guy Stalnaker >> jimmyg...@gmail.com > > Guiness Book claim for worst tongue-twiste

Re: Large set of parts

On 4/27/2018 9:07 AM, Guy Stalnaker wrote: "very thoroughly thought through (…ah, the wonders of the English language <3 )" Brilliant! :-) Guy Stalnaker jimmyg...@gmail.com Guiness Book claim for worst tongue-twister: "The sixth sick sheikh's sixth sick sheep's

Re: Large set of parts

tions on how to produce a large set of parts >> from an existing score? >> >> Each instrument's music is saved as a variable separate from the score >> staves. So I need to create a \score and \staff for 31 parts. Do I create >> 31 separate files? Can I do so

Re: Large set of parts

On 27.04.2018 06:52, Nathan Sprangers wrote: Does anyone have any suggestions on how to produce a large set of parts from an existing score? Each instrument's music is saved as a variable separate from the score staves. So I need to create a \score and \staff for 31 parts. Do I crea

Re: Large set of parts

n just put everything in one output file, sometimes using \bookpart, sometimes not. Hope that helps a little, Martin On 27/04/2018 06:52, Nathan Sprangers wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone have any suggestions on how to produce a large set of parts > from an existing score? > > Each

Large set of parts

Hi all, Does anyone have any suggestions on how to produce a large set of parts from an existing score? Each instrument's music is saved as a variable separate from the score staves. So I need to create a \score and \staff for 31 parts. Do I create 31 separate files? Can I do something