Re: Mixing notation and lyric entry

2010-12-15 Thread -Eluze
input to lyrics. to be honest, i tried it, and i'm back now to "normal" input with one file for every voice/lyric/dynamics/... but maybe your aproach will find approvers! regards Eluze -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Mixing-notation-and-lyric-entry-tp30

Re: Mixing notation and lyric entry

2010-12-15 Thread Michael Ellis
nd can fix the ones I do make >> > faster if the lyrics are close to the notation. As it is now, I have >> > to re-enter (cut, paste & edit) the lyrics in a separate \lyricmode >> > block. Any suggestions for how to write the \withLyrics function? Or >> > is

Re: Mixing notation and lyric entry

2010-12-15 Thread Michael Ellis
g clean solution I haven't found yet? > > > > Thanks, > > Mike > > > > > > imo it is a question of synchronising & visualising the input of 2 ore more > "voices" (in a general way) > > one way is to put both in a table, the first r

Re: Mixing notation and lyric entry

2010-12-15 Thread -Eluze
zed files (in vertical scrolling); that way you could have the melody in the left and the lyric text in the right window (which are both included somewhere in your main score). (of course you can also use one line per measure) hope these ideas are helpful! Eluze --

Re: Mixing notation and lyric entry

2010-12-15 Thread Michael Ellis
The following does what I want but requires explicit variables that have to be manually concatenated. There's got to be a way to reduce the overhead. After all, Scheme is the most powerful language in the known universe, right? \include "english-solfa.ly" % english.ly modified to include solfa s

Re: Mixing notation and lyric entry

2010-12-15 Thread Jan Warchoł
2010/12/15 Michael Ellis > > Jan Warchol wrote "I don't know how it could be done, and i strongly > recommend not doing > this. Separating different types of content is in my opinion very > beneficial" > I agree that separating content is useful.  As you point out, it allows one > to easily recom

Re: Mixing notation and lyric entry

2010-12-15 Thread Michael Ellis
Jan Warchol wrote "I don't know how it could be done, and i strongly recommend not doing this. Separating different types of content is in my opinion very beneficial" I agree that separating content is useful. As you point out, it allows one to easily recombine it in various formats. It's just t

Re: Mixing notation and lyric entry

2010-12-14 Thread Jan Warchoł
Hi, 2010/12/14 Michael Ellis : > Is there a clean way to enter a phrase followed by the corresponding notes > in a \relative block?  The example given in the docs, > > { > \time 3/4 > \relative c' { c2 e4 g2. } > \addlyrics { play the game } > } > > is fine for a small example, but it gets m

Re: Mixing notation and lyric entry

2010-12-14 Thread Laura Conrad
> "Michael" == Michael Ellis writes: Michael> Any suggestions for how to write the \withLyrics function? Michael> Or is there an existing clean solution I haven't found yet? I always used to wish for that, and then I figured out how to use point-and-click and I don't need it any more

Mixing notation and lyric entry

2010-12-14 Thread Michael Ellis
Is there a clean way to enter a phrase followed by the corresponding notes in a \relative block? The example given in the docs, { \time 3/4 \relative c' { c2 e4 g2. } \addlyrics { play the game } } is fine for a small example, but it gets messy for longer music. I do a lot of transcribin