Hi Sámuel,
> I could not get Kieren's \at method working
I apologize: I should have made it clear that what I typed was not a working
solution, but rather an attempt (using "pseudocode") to highlight a feature
that would be very useful in the situation you were describing.
Sincerely,
Kieren.
Thanks all, this solved it (although I could not get Kieren's \at method
working, it works well with empty chords. Gotta say, really nice community
On 13/11/2022 10:16 pm, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Le 13/11/2022 à 21:44, Sámuel Simon-Németh a écrit :
\version "2.23.80"
\new Dynamics \with { %
Le 14/11/2022 à 00:24, Knute Snortum a écrit :
My two cents on the subject: using empty chords to put hairpins on is
not the same as using spacers. Consider this MWE:
\version "2.23.81"
\paper {
indent = 0
}
<<
{
c''4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4
}
\\
{
<>\< s1 <>\!
<>\<
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 2:23 PM Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
>
> Hi Jean,
>
> > Alternatively, you could attach the dynamic to a so-called
> > "empty chord". The above is equivalent to
> >
> > \version "2.23.80"
> >
> > \new Dynamics {
> > s1 \p
> > s \>
> > s \!
> > s1*6
> > <>\mf
> >
Hi Lukas,
> I think we should advocate the "empty chord" style even more consistently
+1
> or even something like
>
> \version "2.23.80"
>
> \new Dynamics {
> <>\p \after 1 \> \after 1*2 \! s1*9
> <>\mf s1
> }
Oh, for an even-more-intuitive way, e.g.
\new Dynamics {
\at (1 0/4) \p
Hi Sámuel.
> s1
> s
> s
> s
> s
> s
> \mf
>
> puts the dynamic in the right place, but
>
> s1*6
>
> does not.
Note that
s1*6 \mf
attaches the dynamic mark to the [beginning of the] s1*6, whereas
s1*6 s1\mf
attaches the dynamic mark to the [beginning of the] s1 which starts after
Hi Jean,
Alternatively, you could attach the dynamic to a so-called
"empty chord". The above is equivalent to
\version "2.23.80"
\new Dynamics {
s1 \p
s \>
s \!
s1*6
<>\mf
s1
}
I think we should advocate the "empty chord" style even more
consistently (and I have a long standing
Sámuel Simon-Németh writes:
> Update: I have found on the Internet that
> s1*x
> would work, where x is the number of bars. However, for some reason, it
> doesn't work for me.
>
> s1
> s
> s
> s
> s
> s
> \mf
>
> puts the dynamic in the right place, but
>
> s1*6
>
> does not.
It would be
Update: I have found on the Internet that
s1*x
would work, where x is the number of bars. However, for some reason, it
doesn't work for me.
s1
s
s
s
s
s
\mf
puts the dynamic in the right place, but
s1*6
does not.
On 13/11/2022 8:39 pm, Sámuel Simon-Németh wrote:
Hello everyone!
I am
Hello everyone!
I am starting out with GNU Lilypond, and so far it's been great.
However, when I create dynamics for piano using `\new Dynamics`, I
obviously need to use spacer rests to put dynamics in the right place.
This is all well and good, however my question is: How do I "space out"
Le 13/11/2022 à 21:44, Sámuel Simon-Németh a écrit :
\version "2.23.80"
\new Dynamics \with { % some settings here } { % for shared dynamics
s1 \p
s \>
s \!
s
s
s
s
s
s
\mf
}
works, but
\version "2.23.80"
\new Dynamics \with { %
Hi Sámuel,
Welcome to this list!
Le 13/11/2022 à 21:37, Sámuel Simon-Németh a écrit :
Also, I have seen s1*/NoOfMeasures/ on the Internet, however it does
not seem to work for me.
That is the usual solution. You say it does not work; how does it fail?
Can you give an example? See
Hello everyone!
I am starting out with GNU Lilypond, and so far it's been great.
However, when I create dynamics for piano using `\new Dynamics`, I
obviously need to use spacer rests to put dynamics in the right place.
This is all well and good, however my question is: How do I "space out"
13 matches
Mail list logo
