Hello folks,
I’d use « data entry mode », as opposed to « presentation fine-tuning ».
JM
Le 2 févr. 2015 à 09:04, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org a écrit :
Hi all,
thank you for your feedback. I've got the following suggestions:
Content mode (as opposed to presentation)
Entry mode
Hi Jacques,
nice suggestion. I like the notion of data as a neutral replacement to
content vs. representation.
Urs
Am 02.02.2015 um 11:25 schrieb Jacques Menu:
Hello folks,
I’d use « data entry mode », as opposed to « presentation fine-tuning ».
JM
Le 2 févr. 2015 à 09:04, Urs Liska
From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
To: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Naming convention brainstorming
Hi all,
for quite some time now I've been using a concept that is very useful,
but finally I'd like to give it an authoritative name to be used in
different places.
I'm
Hi all,
thank you for your feedback. I've got the following suggestions:
* Content mode (as opposed to presentation)
* Entry mode
* Working mode
* Crafting mode
* Sandbox
* Debug-structure
When collecting that list I realized that entry mode got three votes
- while I had already decided
I am no native English speaker.
How about “working mode”?
Or “crafting mode” – if that has the same artistic/handicraft association that I
assume.
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
I'm talking about the working, thinking and compiling mode when I'm
working on the _content_ of a score and not it's final visual
appearance. This mode is characterized for example by
...
Originally we talked about it as draft mode but this doesn't seem to
hit the spot. Nor do devel mode
Hello Urs
If I undestand correctly this is a type of debug mode. If so could it be a
debug sub-set such as debug_structure when there is the
possiblility of other debug modes.
regards
Peter Gentry
___
lilypond-user mailing list
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:58 PM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Colin Campbell colinpkcampb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Content mode as opposed to presentation mode?
Seem very reasonable to me. Another possibility might be entry mode.
As a
Hi all,
for quite some time now I've been using a concept that is very useful,
but finally I'd like to give it an authoritative name to be used in
different places.
I'm talking about the working, thinking and compiling mode when I'm
working on the _content_ of a score and not it's final
Iteration mode?
On Jan 31, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
Hi all,
for quite some time now I've been using a concept that is very useful, but
finally I'd like to give it an authoritative name to be used in different
places.
I'm talking about the working,
Hi Urs,
I call that “entry mode”.
Cheers,
Kieren.
___
Kieren MacMillan, composer
www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info
email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Colin Campbell colinpkcampb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Content mode as opposed to presentation mode?
Seem very reasonable to me. Another possibility might be entry mode.
David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
On 2015-01-31 06:41 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
Hi all,
for quite some time now I've been using a concept that is very useful,
but finally I'd like to give it an authoritative name to be used in
different places.
I'm talking about the working, thinking and compiling mode when I'm
working on the
13 matches
Mail list logo
